Search Results: "will"

4 October 2008

Gunnar Wolf: Acer Aspire One fan control

Almost a month ago, Mauro pointed towards acerfand, a daemon to keep the Acer Aspire One's fan quiet while not needed. Thanks, Mauro, you made my life more pleasant ;-)
Today I had some free time in my hands (of course, putting aside everything else I should be doing), so I decided to un-uglify my machine. I hate having random stuff in /usr/local! So I packaged Rachel Greenham's acerfand for Debian. It should hit unstable soon.
Of course, it will not make it to Lenny - which is a shame, giving how nicely Lenny recognizes everything in this sweet machine. So, I have set up a repository for it - Once the package is formally accepted in Debian, and once lenny-backports comes to life there, I will move it to backports.org. Anyway, you can add this to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://www.iiec.unam.mx/apt/ lenny acer
deb-src http://www.iiec.unam.mx/apt/ lenny acer
Note that in the future, this package might provide some more niceties... I decided to -at least for now- stash away acer_ec in /usr/share/acerfand, but it does open a nice window to the AAO's EC(?) registers... And could be useful for many other things.

Joey Hess: feature creep

The original spec for today: Go out to Anna's. Run some cables.
Use case: Joey is in yurt. Joey has power, and even interwebs. But this means parking the truck in the area where it got stuck the last two times. Ok, let's add in getting a load of gravel to fix that. Hmm, if we're going to get one load of gravel (over one ton already!), might as well get two... Hmm, we didn't notice that unloading tons of gravel, for three people with shovels, is 95% of the planned work for today. Oh well, let's do it anyway... Darn, that super-long ethernet cable that was part of the original plan doesn't work. No link at all, no lights on the cable tester. (Bisection shows the problem affects only half the cable.) At least the power cable worked. I guess that ethernet will have to be dealt with in version 2.0..

Erich Schubert: Debugging Windows with the help of Linux

On my parents' small laptop, Windows would just reboot. Even the repair functions of Windows would just reboot. No error message you could read, just reboot, repeat. Linux still worked fine (and my family is fine with using Linux, fortunately).Linux also allowed us to quickly find out what is wrong with Windows: the hard disk is damaged (I like operating systems that give you useful error messages such as "Unrecoverable Error" on your harddisk). And most likely the laptop is out of warrenty since a month ago, as usual.So I'm now investigating if the Linux partition also contains hardware errors, or if we might get away with just disabling Windows altogether for some time, until I get around to buy a replacement harddisk (and a replacement battery, too). So far, our experiences with Medion/Aldi/Tchibo have been rather bad. The TFT screen for the main computer is often flickering, but they failed to repair it in two attempts now. The MP3-CD-Player had stopped reading and the replacement didn't play MP3 at all. And the laptops batteries were crap (and why did they put in two small batterys instead of a reasonably sized one?), I know of a friend where the CD drive of that same model doesn't work anymore, and now our harddisk is dead with just some 11 days of use total (it was meant to be a portable system, and my parents have better computers for daily use at home).If we buy a replacement, it will most likely be a so called "Netbook" with Linux preinstalled. These tiny systems often come preinstalled with Linux (because a Windows licence would increase the price by like 50%) and would fit our requirements pretty well. Not sure which one, though. Maybe an EEE.

3 October 2008

Christian Perrier: Why I think Foss.in/2008 is missing its target..

(long post, you've been warned) With his his 'Omelette Post' about FOSS.IN/2008 Call for Participation, Atul Chitnis, the FOSS.IN team 'leader' indeed sent an strong sign. For those who aren't aware of it, FOSS.IN is the longstanding major FLOSS event in India and, still (just like our beloved Debconf) only run by volunteers. Last year, along with Sam Hocevar, I had the chance to attend the event and share the groove of that big, huge, conference, with over 2,000 participants. Some other Debian fellows also made it in the past (Jaldhar, Bdale...). During the Debian Project Day as well as regular conference days, we had the great opportunity to meet with the people who currently participate in Debian (and Ubuntu) in South Asia, as well as first meeting some major contributors from other projects. For me, and, I think, of all people I met up there, this was a great *and productive* event. Maybe not productive at the moment it happened, but productive in terms of mutual awareness, knowledge and friendship. All people who attended such conferences (should I say "Debconf" or "FOSDEM"?) know what I'm talking about. The conference was still quite focused on "real" FLOSS contribution more than evangelizing or politics. And I think it succeeded in it quite well. This year, I already planned to not attend...mostly because such event, with the associated long travel time, is something I can't really fit in my real life right now. Also, because it conflicts with a planned Extremadura work session, indeed. Still, I would indeed not have attended it. Atul's post makes it clear: the even will only be about coding. The point is to put focus on people who code and we do 'real' code. Bug fixing is not coding. Translation effort is not coding. Work on support for complex languages is not coding. Actually, what FOSS.IN/2008 organizers are trying to do is a kind of big Debcamp. I'm afraid it won't work this way. From what I have seen in years of participation to Debian, things just don't come up this way. People don't sit down and code because they're invited to. And, still, are only "people who code" the only people that matter in a project? Debian is sometimes seen as one of the biggest FLOSS projects all around (probably shared with the Linux kernel). How many people in Debian just "sit down and code"? What about those people who maintain our web site, our archive, setup our infrastructure, our new maintainer queue, our communication channels? What about those dozens of people who nicely maintain packages and keep the link with upstream developers, or fix bugs.... Those people do not seem welcomed at FOSS.IN/2008. "Not only bug fixing" is said in this announcement. This, I don't get it. At all. Why would "bug fixing" be second class work? Why would it be more noble to "code" new stuff? Maybe Atul did not mean to say this. He wants to have Indian contributors in FLOSS to be more visible....but I don't share this. Indian contributors in Debian *are* visible. Giridhar Appaji Nag is visible, "my" translator crew is visible, Kartik Mistry is visible (he once was too visible, even, by maintaining a little bit too many packages...). Bug fixing is the most noble task I see in FLOSS development. This is what we need the most. I recently blogged about how I feel APT to be 'poorly' maintained (once again, that was not targeted to current APT maintainers). What I would respect deeply is to see a bunch of Indian contributors stand up and take this task over. Atul, that would certainly not be "outsourcing code/package maintenance" and, no, these are not things one can get involved with instantly. Really, I don't buy this vision and that saddens me. That saddens me mostly because I know the folks there. I know the FOSS.IN organizers and I have deep respect for them. I just think they're missing the target and are too ambitious: one cannot change an event so drastically by just saying it has to change..:-) And, really, I'm even more sad to see localization work be called a low-hanging fruit from a country where there are 22 official languages. Or take words such as "talk is cheap, show me the code" as $ DEITY 's Holy Word just because it was once said by Linus Torvalds (who said many stupid things). Code is just one part of FLOSS development. Certainly one of the important parts but still one part. What would have happened to FLOSS if only "coders" had been working on it all over those years? It would be something used by about 10,000 people all around the world, that's all. We should not make an opposition between those who code and those who don't. By the way, do *I* code? When I'm sitting at 07:00AM on a Saturday morning, hacking on Samba packages and try to have Samba 3.2.4 built with the set of patches we have on Debian....do I code? I'm not *producing* code....the code was produced by those wonderful Samba Team folks. Does Karolin Seeger code when she's releasing samba with such a precise and constant schedule as she's doing since early 2008? Or Ana Guerrero when she (not alone!) compiles dozens of KDE packages and organizes and bumps the maintenance of KDE in Debian for the best of our users. Or Miriam Ruiz when she picks up each and every possible free game and tries to get it in Debian, talks with upstream developers, help them to fiw their code to suit the severe requirements of the Debian policy? Or Clytie Siddall when she translates about every major FLOSS in Vietnamese (nor URL here, sorry)? All these folks are part of the FLOSS game. You want Indians to be part of FLOSS game? Then allow the potential Karolin, Ana, Miriam or Clytie to be part of Indian FLOSS game and don't try to make FOSS.in the place where you seek the future Indian Linus Torvalds and only him her. Talk is cheap, show me the contribution.

Jeff Bailey: In the US for one more month...

Hey - we're heading to Montreal for part of the next week on a house hunting trip. Keeping in mind that our toddler's bed time is ~19h30 and then we can't leave him, we'd love to see people for early dinners. Thursday and Friday we'll be in Quebec city for CLLAP. Back in Montreal on Saturday and flying home on Sunday. It seems this will be Thanksgiving-free year for us with the move timing.

And thinking of things to be thankful of.. How do you people in the US cope without Neo-Citron?

Michal Čihař: Gammu stable version 1.21.0

Good news everyone, after long time of inactivity and huge development over past month, new stable Gammu release is out. Since 1.20.94, there are only minor fixes in handling some corner cases in AT parser, but full list of changes since last stable 1.20.0 is quite long: You can download from usual place: http://cihar.com/gammu/, Binary packages will be available soon.

John Goerzen: What Traditional Values Mean to Me

A comment on Facebook yesterday got me thinking what American "traditional values" are all about. We hear it a lot, and I suspect it means something different to different people.

Here's what it means to me.

It starts with an ethic fundamentally informed by the central tenets of Christianity -- which are also excellent standards of decency by secular standards. We are called to have a relentless drive to care for the repressed, poor, downtrodden. As Jesus said, "whatever you do to the least of these, so you do to me." It means extending the hand of friendship and compassion to all, in our own neighborhood and around the world. It means taking good care of the resources we have, acting responsibly, and affirming and supporting others so they can do the same. It means that, as our founding fathers emphasized, remembering that all people are created equal, are equally deserving of a good life, and deserve liberty and freedom. Finally, it means a constant realization that we are creating a human institution, and will always have an imperfect answer to these ideals, but that we can -- and must -- recognize our faults and strive to make things better.

How do these apply to our time?

We must start with the poor, the repressed, and habitually think of their situation in everything we do. That means remembering that when we drop a bomb in Afghanistan to kill a terrorist, we also usually kill 50 innocent bystanders, and devastate their families. It means remembering that illegal immigrants from Mexico come here because all they want is refuge from drug wars, food on the table, and a roof over their head. It means showing compassion in deportation proceedings: when illegal immigrant parents have a child born in the United States, the child is an American citizen and can't be deported, but deporting the parents will create an orphan. It means actively helping the repressed people of the world, whether they be in Sudan, Georgia, or AIDS victims in Africa, Muslims in New York. It means reducing taxes on the poor, giving them the skills and tools they need to make their way in life. It means caring for those with alcohol drug addictions, helping them to summon the strength to get past those problems, rather than locking them up or throwing them out on the street. In days past, this might have meant sharing firewood with the family down the road that was at risk of freezing in winter. Today it might mean assistance with winter heating bills.

Remembering that all people are created equal means that we must provide good education for everyone, whether they live in suburban California, inner city Detroit, or rural Appalachia. We owe quality health care to everyone; those without means to pay for health care, or to pay for a car to get to a clinic, should be treated with dignity and respect, and have equal access to medicine.

Remembering that all people are created equal also means that we must provide equal justice under law, and give everyone a fair trail. We must abandon the death penalty, because we have a shocking number of people on death row -- hugely disproportionately black and poor -- that have been shown innocent of their crimes thanks to advances in DNA testing. We must maintain the integrity of checks and balances in government, and support judicial oversight over search and seizure. We must avoid warrantless wiretapping because it subverts judicial oversight and corrupts our justice system by making the exercise of power secret. We must denounce torture, and refuse to employ it, because no human, being created equal, deserves to be treated in such a way -- and we have been applying it to innocent humans.

We owe the opportunity to grow up in a loving family, in a safe community, to every child. We must make sure that gangs no longer have the run of our streets, that drugs aren't displacing hard work as the currency of the community, and that adoption is inexpensive and practical for more families, rather than costing thousands of dollars. Doing so will help every child grow up knowing that they are valued, are important, rather than being unwanted and therefore abused or neglected.

Extending the hand of friendship and compassion to all starts with being a good example -- that shining city on a hill that Reagan talked about. We have to run an open, just, and fair society ourselves. We must not fear those that are different than us, just because they're different. We have to recognize that citizens of Iran, Russia, North Korea, Palestine, and the United States fundamentally are humans, created equal, seeking the same thing: a safe and secure future for themselves and their families. Being able to coexist peacefully means starting from that point, and being willing to talk to them, and yes, even their leaders, regardless of how distasteful they may be.

Acting responsibly with our resources starts at home -- things like not driving up credit card debt, not living outside our means. The same applies to government: massive deficits each year are exceptionally irresponsible and place us at great risk both at the present and in the future. We also have a duty to care for the planet and the environment in which we live, which means actively working to curb the things we do to harm the planet and cause global warming.

What about recognizing our faults? Perhaps the most patriotic duty asked of Americans is dissent. It is never easy, but is essential to keeping our democracy functioning. This country has a long history of successes, and also a long history of failures. We failed so many by keeping slavery legal for so long, and discrimination and lynching legal for even longer. We failed that Native Americans by forcing them from their lands and treating them with brutality. We have, to some extent, risen above these failures thanks to the ability to recognize them and try, to the best of our ability, to fix them. This is what the civil rights movement was about, and why we have a holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr. He spoke out against a society that said some couldn't eat in a restaurant because of the color of their skin, or who were repressed because of their economic status. He recognized that problem in America, and by speaking out against it, helped to change this country for the better.

Today we have to recognize the things we are doing wrong, and try to change them. We are torturing potentially innocent people. We are discriminating against Muslims and homosexuals in our midst. We are giving extraordinary power to big media companies through changes in copyright law, to big communications companies through failure to enact network neutrality laws. And we are labeling people that disagree with war as unpatriotic.

Notice some things I didn't mention, such as abortion. It's not really relevant, and the lines we are fed by both sides present us with this false pro choice vs. pro life debate. In reality, it seems to me that both sides want the best for the children: for every child to grow up in a loving family, where he or she is wanted. We all know from research that laws banning abortion do not actually reduce it. So we ought all to come together and try to make it more rare by providing more support to single parents, by making it easier to adopt children, by trying to make the perceived need for an abortion to go away.

So, in this election, I look at the candidates and it seems pretty clear which one is promoting traditional values and which one isn't. Obama is actively trying to reach across the aisle and find common ground. Even in his convention speech, he suggested ways to work together on abortion like I just mentioned. In the debate, he listened carefully to his opponent and acknowledged when he thought McCain was right. This is a necessary first step in working together to move forward. McCain subsequently released an ad mocking Obama for this.

What about caring for the poor? Again, Obama's tax policies, education policies, and health care policies take care of them far better than McCain's. About responsibility? McCain supported these deficit-busting budgets of the last 6 years, supported the oil-centric energy policies, and has been only lukewarm towards dealing with global warming. McCain and Palin mock Obama for trying to help poor Chicago neighborhoods 20 years ago, for being willing to just talk to our supposed enemies, for actually reaching across the aisle.

So yes, I am a values voter, and that's why I can't possibly do anything but vote for Obama.

Adrian von Bidder: Desktop integration

Sune Vuorela raises a few interesting points about integration of various (meta)data storage frameworks on your KDE desktop (read the comments, too, as several of these issues have been or are being addressed.) A huge, somewhat related, itch to me is that the end user of a Linux desktop still has to care if an application uses KDE, GNOME, XFCE, GNUstep, old style X11 or whatever. As an end user, I don't care that GIMP is a GTK application. Somebody told me that I can use fish:/ URLs to open remote files and I've duly noted down the syntax because I have no idea what this does, but it does open this file the webdude has told me I should edit with kolourpaint, and now I want to use GIMP because it's much nicer to use ... Similar issues with settings (I did set the web proxy in the system settings, now why do half of the application not respect this?) and all kinds of other stuff. I believe it's issues like this that will hamper the Linux on the Desktop the most in future. Obviously, in a controlled (corporate) environment, this is not a big problem because it's a problem for the IT staff, but in the SOHO and home computer market, these are real, difficult problems, and since they don't know any of the technical problems behind it it's also very hard to explain why it's not easy for me to set up their system so it works like they feel it should (I already have problems explaining why there should be different Linux distributions at all ... ) Update: It occurs to me that this is the kind of stuff we (distribution developers) should be concentrating on, by putting pressure on upstream and doing some of the work. I guess we've concentrated too much on just packaging the stuff.

Adrian von Bidder: Microsoft contacting me

I recently received an email from Amy Wilcox from Murphy & Associates, representing Microsoft (the mail was sent from a Microsoft address, via smtp.microsoft.com, so it appears to be genuine.) They asked me to remove the ban for Microsoft search from my robots.txt because customers complained they couldn't find my site
First, cowards, they (the people complaining to MS) should have contacted me directly. I don't exactly hide my email address. Second: apparently they still did know about my site, else they wouldn't have complained to MS. In any case, I responded that the removal of this robots.txt entry would be a commercial opportunity for me if they cared to take me up on this offer. I will, of course, amend the omission of not putting a robots.txt on my new blog.fortytwo.ch domain...

Russell Coker: DKIM and Mailing Lists

Currently we have a problem with the Debian list server and Gmail. Gmail signs all mail that it sends with both DKIM and DomainKeys (DomainKeys has been obsoleted by DKIM so most mail servers implement only one of the two standards although apart from space there is no reason not to use both). The Debian list servers change the message body without removing the signatures, and therefore send out mail with invalid signatures. DKIM has an option to specify the length of the body part that it signs. If that option is used then an intermediate system can append data to the body without breaking the signature. This could be bad if a hostile party could intercept messages and append something damaging, but has the advantage that mailing list footers will not affect the signature. Of course if the list server modifies the Subject to include the list name in brackets at the start of the subject line then it will still break the signature. However Gmail is configured to not use the length field, and a Gmail user has no option to change this (AFAIK - if anyone knows how to make Gmail use the DKIM length field for their own account then please let me know). I believe that the ideal functionality of a sending mail server would be to have the configuration of it’s DKIM milter allow specifying which addresses should have the length field used. For example I would like to have all mail sent to an address matching @lists\. have the length field used (as well as some other list servers that don’t match that naming scheme), and I would also like to be able to specify which recipient addresses should have no DKIM signatures (for example list servers that modify the subject line). I have filed Debian bug #500967 against the dkim-filter package requesting this feature [1]. For correct operation of a list server, the minimal functionality is implemented in the Mailman package in Lenny. That is to strip off DKIM and DomainKey signatures. The ideal functionality of a list server would be that for lists that are not configured to modify the Subject line it would leave a DKIM header that uses the length field and otherwise remove the DKIM header. I have filed Debian bug #500965 against lists.debian.org requesting that the configuration be changed to strip the headers in question in a similar manner [2] (the Debian list servers appear to use SmartList - I have not checked whether the latest version of SmartList does the right thing in this regard - if not it deserves another bug report). I have also filed Debian bug report #500966 requesting that the list servers sign all outbound mail with DKIM [3]. I believe that protecting the integrity of the Debian mail infrastructure is important, preventing forged mail is a good thing, and that the small amount of CPU time needed for this is worth the effort. Also the Debian project is in a position of leadership in the community. We should adopt new technologies that benefit society first to help encourage others to do the same and also to help find and fix bugs.

Share This

Ian Wienand: Poking around in AUXV, part 2

I've written about AUXV previously, focusing on one of its most interesting applications -- its role in helping find linux-gate.so.1. If you're starting your program, you can get the dynamic loader to echo out the AUXV fields with the environment variable LD_SHOW_AUXV, but if your process has started you'll need to pull the values out of /proc/pid/auxv directly. This is pretty internal stuff for the dynamic loader and is probably only useful if you're writing a debugger or doing some other low-level tricks (such as debugging!). However, should you need to, here is some sample code which does just that. Hopefully it will save someone else some time!

2 October 2008

Matthew Garrett

LET'S TALK ABOUT AFGHANISTAN MY NICKNAME WILL BE SARAH PALIN

Simon Richter: A design question

As some of you may or may not be aware, I'm hacking on a new build tool that has a purely descriptive language for project descriptions, with lots of sensible defaults. Right now, the only thing I really require users to do is to declare the name and type of the project, for example Program: foo This will just take all files in this directory that it understands, compile them, and link them to an executable called "foo" (or "foo.exe"). So far, so good. However, there are more complex examples, specifically those where multiple outputs are installed to different directories, for example in the case of libraries: Library: foo
Public: foo.h, foo.c I've omitted the library versioning stuff from the example, because it isn't necessary to understand the problem. This means "take all compilable files, link them to "libfoo.so" (resp. "foo.dll") and only mark the symbols defined in foo.c as exported (not listing code generating files will fall back to exporting everything); then install foo.h into /usr/include (or make it available as <foo.h> to dependent projects). Now, I'd like to add an optional parameter to place a "published" resource into a namespace. How that is defined is dependent on the type of the resource (exported symbols could be tagged with a symbol version, while include files would be installed into a subdirectory of /usr/include). And this is where I would like to get some input. How should such a declaration look like in the project description file? The file is in RFC822 style format, with one section per project (multiple projects in a single directory are permitted if you list the inputs explicitly), and I'd rather keep it that way. Ideas so far:
  1. Public[foo]: foo.h
    Public[FOO_1_0]: foo.c
This means multiple lines and dividing .c and .h files since their "namespace" attributes mean something entirely different.
  • Public: foo.h [foo], foo.c [FOO_1_0]
    • This ends up becoming pretty repetitive if I have a lot of header files. Neither of these looks as "clean" as I'd like a new file format to look. I'm pretty much sure "built-in" tagging of certain things will be handled by separate top-level tags (similar to automake): User-Public: userdoc.sgml
    Developer-Public: devdoc.sgml     I'm open to criticism on this one as well though.

    Russell Coker: How Many Singularities?

    There is a lot of discussion and speculation about The Singularity. The term seems to be defined by Ray Kurzweil’s book “The Singularity Is Near” [1] which focuses on a near-future technological singularity defined by significant increases in medical science (life extension and methods to increase mental capacity) and an accelerating rate of scientific advance. In popular culture the idea that there will only be one singularity seems to be well accepted, so the discussion is based on when it will happen. One of the definitions for a singularity is that it is a set of events that change society in significant ways such that predictions are impossible - based on the concept of the Gravitational Singularity (black hole) [2]. Science fiction abounds with stories about what happens after someone enters a black hole, so the concept of a singularity not being a single event (sic) is not unknown, but it seems to me that based on our knowledge of science no-one considers there to be a black hole with multiple singularities - not even when confusing the event horizon with the singularity. If we consider a singularity to merely consist of a significant technological change (or set of changes) that change society in ways that could not have been predicted (not merely changes that were not predicted) then it seems that there have been several already, here are the ones that seem to be likely candidates: 0) The development of speech was a significant change for our species (and a significant change OF our species). Maybe we should consider that to be singularity 0 as hominids that can’t speak probably can’t be considered human. 1) The adoption of significant tool use and training children in making and using tools (as opposed to just letting them learn by observation) made a significant change to human society. I don’t think that with the knowledge available to bands of humans without tools it would have been possible to imagine that making stone axes and spears would enable them to dominate the environment and immediately become the top of the food chain. In fact as pre-tool hominids were generally not near the top of the food chain they probably would have had difficulty imagining being rulers of the world. I’m sure that it led to an immediate arms race too. 2) The development of agriculture was a significant change to society that seems to have greatly exceeded the expectations that anyone could have had at the time. I’m sure that people started farming as merely a way of ensuring that the next time they migrated to an area there was food available (just sowing seeds along traditional migration routes for a hunter-gatherer existence). They could not have expected that the result would be a significant increase in the ability to support children and a significant increase in the number of people who could be sustained by a given land area, massive population growth, new political structures to deal with greater population density, and then wiping out hunter-gatherer societies in surrounding regions. It seems likely to me that the mental processes needed to predict the actions of a domestic animal (in terms of making it a friend, worker, or docile source of food) differ from those needed to predict the actions of other humans (who’s mental processes are similar) and from those needed to predict the actions of prey that is being hunted (you only need to understand enough to kill it). 3) The invention of writing allowed the creation of larger empires through better administration. All manner of scientific and political development was permitted by writing. 4) The work of Louis Pasteur sparked a significant development in biology which led to much greater medical technology [3]. This permitted much greater population densities (both in cities and in armies) without the the limitation of significant disease problems. It seems that among other things the world-wars depended on developments in preventing disease which were linked to Louis’ work. Large populations densely congregated in urban areas permit larger universities and a better exchange of knowledge which permitted further significant developments in technology. It seems unlikely that a population suffering the health problems that were common in 1850 could have simultaneously supported large-scale industrial warfare and major research projects such as the Manhattan Project. 5) The latest significant change in society has been the development of the Internet and mobile phones. Mobile phones were fairly obvious in concept, but have made structural changes to society. For example I doubt that hand-writing is going to be needed to any great extent in the future [4], the traditional letter has disappeared, and “Dates” are now based on “I’ll call your mobile when I’m in the area” instead of meeting at a precise time - but this is the trivial stuff. Scientific development and education have dramatically increased due to using the Internet and business now moves a lot faster due to mobile phones. It seems that nowadays any young person who doesn’t want to be single and unemployed needs to have either a mobile phone or Internet access - and preferably both. When mobile phones were first released I never expected that almost everyone would feel compelled to have one, and when I first started using the Internet in 1992 I never expected it to have the rich collaborative environment of Wikipedia, blogging, social networking, etc (I didn’t imagine anything much more advanced than file exchange and email). Of these changes the latest (Internet and mobile phones) seems at first glance to be the least significant - but let’s not forget that it’s still an ongoing process. The other changes became standard parts of society long ago. So it seems that we could count as many as six singularities, but it seems that even the most conservative count would have three singularities (tool use, agriculture, and writing). It seems to me that the major factors for a singularity are an increased population density (through couples being able to support more children, through medical technology extending the life expectancy, through greater food supplies permitting more people to live in an area, or through social structures which manage the disputes that arise when there is a great population density) and increased mental abilities (which includes better education and communication). Research into education methods is continuing, so even without genetically modified humans, surgically connecting computers to human brains, or AI we can expect intelligent beings with a significant incremental advance over current humans in the near future. Communications technology is continually being improved, with some significant advances in the user-interfaces. Even if we don’t get surgically attached communications devices giving something similar to “telepathy” (which is not far from current technology), there are possibilities for significant increments in communication ability through 3D video-conferencing, better time management of communication (inappropriate instant communication destroys productivity), and increased communication skills (they really should replace some of the time-filler subjects at high-school with something useful like how to write effective diagrams). It seems to me that going from the current situation of something significantly less than one billion people with current (poor) education and limited communications access (which most people don’t know how to use properly) to six billion people with devices that are more user-friendly and powerful than today’s computers and mobile phones combined with better education as to how to use them has the potential to increase the overall rate of scientific development by more than an order of magnitude. This in itself might comprise a singularity depending on the criteria you use to assess it. Of course that would take at least a generation to implement, a significant advance in medical technology or AI could bring about a singularity much sooner. But I feel safe in predicting that people who expect the world to remain as it is forever will be proven wrong yet again, and I also feel safe in predicting that most of them will still be alive to see it. I believe that we will have a technological singularity (which will be nothing like the “rapture” which was invented by some of the most imaginative interpretations of the bible). I don’t believe that it will be the final singularity unless we happen to make our species extinct (in which case there will most likely be another species to take over the Earth and have it’s own singularities).

    Share This

    Sandro Tosi: Scooters are harder than bones

    On Sep 23rd I had an accident coming back home from work, and I've been hospitalized until this afternoon, with no internet access.

    Nothing too dramatic, but my right knee is broken, so I got to stay put for another month or so.

    I'm spending this period away from my home, hence even from my usually Debian box (with my tools, GPG keys, and so); that said, my contribution to Debian in these days will be a little bit "restricted".

    I'll be catching up with emails soon: I already saw some needing an input from me, so just wait a little longer and I'll be back to you.

    Don't worry, I'll be back!! :)

    Neil Williams: Time pressures

    It's been really strange coming back from DebConf then Extremadura and having to fit my code time around paid work and housework and general stuff again. I keep wondering why I'm not getting things done and then realising that I've only got so many hours a week nowadays compared to the entire week during the worksessions. What makes it worse is the short gap between the conferences. I misjudged the length of time without income and didn't make any days available for paid work between DebConf and Extremadura. OK, it was only about a week but it was a further week without income followed by the week getting to and from Spain.
    I'm now doing extra days to recover from the extra time without income and it makes the contrast even more noticeable. The tiredness from the extra work then makes it hard to get started on what I thought I'd get done. I've done a little bit on emdebian-tools and apt-cross, I've done a little bit on a few RC bugs and I've not done a load of stuff I thought I would have done by now.
    If you're wondering why something I said I'd do has not been done, file a bug and I'll get to it. (The bug lists for buildd.emdebian.org or emdebian-tools are my main ToDo lists, if it appears in that list of bugs, I'll not forget. If it appears in an email, I probably will forget.)

    Adrian von Bidder: More Linux Plumbing

    Apparently I'm not the only one working on explaining under-the-hood non-kernel subsystems: from Lennart Poettering comes an excellent writeup on Sound APIs under Linux. (update: It appears Lennart goofed in some aspects, one response to his article is in aseigo's blog. I can't comment on the content, really, I just don't know enough.)
    Meanwhile, I'd like to thank all those who have commented on my linuxplumbing writeup. There are still some comments pending in my mail queue, I will get to them eventually.

    Russell Coker: Solutions for the Housing Crisis

    Currently we have a huge husing crisis in the US which involves significant political corruption including the federal government preventing state governments from stopping predatory banking practices [1]. The corrupt plan to solve this is to simply give the banks a lot of taxpayer money, so the banking business model then becomes to do whatever it takes to make a short-term profit and then rely on federal funds for long-term viability. The bank employees who caused the problem by aggressively selling mortgages to people who could never repay them if the housing prices stabilised - let alone if the prices fell. If the aim is to protect families, then the first requirement is that they not be evicted from their homes. The solution to this is to void the mortgage of anyone resident home owner who purchased a house on the basis of false advice from the bank or who unknowingly entered into a mortgage that any reasonable person who is good at maths can recognise as being impossible for them to repay. The bank would end up with clear title to the property and the ex-homeowner would end up with no debt. Then such properties could be set for a controlled rent for a reasonable period of time (say 5 years). The bank (or it’s creditors) would have the option of renting the property to the ex-mortgagee for a minimum of five years or selling the property to someone else who was willing to do so. Of course the ex-mortgagee (who would not be bankrupt) would have the option of seeking out a new mortgage at reasonable rates and then buying thier home again. Also to benefit families the rent control period could be extended for as long as they have dependent children. The losers in this would be the banks and the people who purchased multiple investment properties (the ones who caused all the problems). Finally what is needed is a cultural shift towards austerity (as described by Juan Enriquez and Jorge Dominguez) [2]. Glen makes an interesting point about the irony of typical homeowners in the US demonstrating more financial literacy than the people who run banks [3].

    Share This

    MJ Ray: The Trouble With Big Webmail

    So last week, a relative commented to me that a solicitor sent a letter in reply to an email. I suggested that it might be because the email reply address was on one of the major free web email providers. “What’s wrong with my webmail?” So I explained… First of all, as far as I know, no Big Webmail service supports encrypted email (and there are complications in how you’d provide such a thing on webmail anyway) and it can be fairly easy to trick the webmail service into giving access to other people. My relative was sceptical, but within a day, US vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s Yahoo mail was cracked and splashed across the news. (By the way - gov.palin counted as a personal email address? Huh? Her name isn’t “gov”.) Even without passwords going astray, there’s no telling that the intended recipient is the only person reading the email. Here’s a fun paragraph from the Google Mail Terms:-
    “Google maintains and processes your Gmail account and its contents to provide the Gmail service to you and to improve our services. The Gmail service includes relevant advertising and related links based on the IP address, content of messages and other information related to your use of Gmail.” (emphasis added)
    The Electronic Privacy Information Center suggests this includes wiretapping. There’s finally a growing awareness that free webmails are not safe, built on artificial anti-competitive encouragements like “you need a Yahoo!ID to subscribe to this yahoogroup” (no - the old “stick -subscribe after the group name, before the @” still works, just like it did before they bought it from egroups). Internet Psychologist Graham Jones writes:-
    “It’s time to review your online security and think about whether you actually need Google and its like at all. Probably not.” (source)
    I agree with that. Both of my phone companies (The Phone Co-op agency and 3) include webmail - although I have some personal domains (for long-term contactability), those webmails are fine for lists and short-term use. The sort of thing most people seem to use Big Webmail for. The other main point in my argument was that free webmails are unreliable, thanks to tactics like Yahoo’s shoddy anti-spam attacks on other mailservers. There’s no telling whether the email will get through such bad behaviour and delivery-receipts are unreliable. I can quite understand why a solicitor won’t send email to the likes of hotmail, even if I think it’s just as probable that the solicitor doesn’t “get” email. “Oh” said my relative. I think she’s still using Big Webmail though.

    MJ Ray: Is Firsht Social Networking s Godfrey?

    A case of a former friend impersonating someone on facebook was decided during the summer: Applause Store Productions Ltd. & Anor v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (24 July 2008) . The victim was awarded thousands of pounds in damages. As I write this, there’s still no response on facebook’s news page, but I wonder whether Firsht will be to UK social networking what Godfrey was to UK Usenet. A bit of a wake-up - a reminder that the internet isn’t a consequence-free playpen. I know that more than most - my youthful indiscretions are plastered across the web, if you know where to look. Fortunately, cooperative associates seem to understand that people learn over time and don’t hold decade-old mistakes against me. Talking of not holding old mistakes against people, LinkedIn is profitting from an influx of bankers since the banks started going bust. That’s going to change the society behind their network - for better or worse? All of the big name networks seem to be having some growing pains, like the breakdown of the Facebook metaphor and I think the “walled gardens” are ripe for replacement. I’m still listed there at present, but I’m using my account on the cooperativemagazine NoseRub server to monitor it and most of the stuff posted to facebook is taken from my websites. I’d like to make NoseRub import and export more things in more formats, but will anyone pay for that work? Otherwise, it keeps falling down my priorities because it’s in PHP and I don’t find that much fun. Maybe I’ll replace it with something more amusing in Scheme or Perl. Aside: is there a good bot that produces an RSS feed of jabber/XMPP presence messages?

    Next.

    Previous.