FrOSCon is approaching, and
all MirBSD developers will attend but why s there no MirBSD exhibit?
The answer to that is a bit complex. First let s state that of course
we will participate in the event as well as the Open Source world.
We ll also be
geocaching around the campus with other
interested (mostly OSS) people (including those we won for this sport)
and helping out other OSS projects we ve become attached to.
MirOS BSD, the operating system, is a niche system. The conference
on the other hand got younger and more mainstream. This means that
almost all conference visitors do not belong to the target group of
MirOS BSD which somewhat is an ancient solution : the most classical
BSD around (NetBSD loses because they have rc.d and PAM and lack
sendmail(8), sorry guys, your attempt at being not reformable doesn t
count) and running on restricted hardware (such as my 486SLC with 12
MiB RAM) and exots (SPARCstation). It s viable even as developer
workstation (if your hardware is supported otherwise just virtualise
it) but its strength lies with SPARC support and embedded x86 . And
being run as virtual machine: we re reportedly more stable and more
performant than OpenBSD. MirBSD is not cut off from modern development
and occasionally takes a questionable but justified choice (such as
using 16-bit Unicode internally) or a weird-looking but beneficial
one (such as OPTU encoding saving us
locale(1) hassles) or even acts
as technological pioneer (64-bit
time_t on ILP32 platforms)
or, at least, is faster than OpenBSD (newer GNU toolchain, things
like that), but usually more conservatively, and yes, this is by
design, not by lack of manpower, most of the time.
The MirPorts Framework, while technically superiour in enough
places, is something that just cannot happen without manpower.
I (tg@) am still using it exclusively, continuing to update ports
I use and occasionally creating new ones (mupdf is in the works!),
but it s not something I d recommend someone (other than an Mac OSX
user) to use on a n n-MirBSD system (Interix is not exactly thriving
either, and the Interix support was only begun; other OSes are not
widely tested).
The MirBSD Korn Shell is probably
the one thing I will be remembered for. But I have absolutely no idea
how one would present it on a booth at such an exhibition. A talk is
much more likely. So no on that front too.
jupp, the editor which sucks less,
is probably something that does deserve mainstream interest (especially
considering Natureshadow is using it while teaching computing to kids)
but probably more in a workshop setting. And booth space is precious
enough in the FH so I think that d be unfair.
All the other subprojects and side projects Benny and I have, such
as
mir c ,
josef stalin, FreeWRT, Lunix Ewe, Shellsnippets, the fonts, etc. are
interesting but share few, if any, common ground. Again, this does not
match the vast majority of visitors. While we probably should push a
number of these more, but a booth isn t it here, either.
MirOS Linux ( MirLinux ) and MirOS Windows are, despite otherwise-saying
rumours called W*k*p*d*a, only premature ideas that will not really be
worked on (though MirLinux concepts are found in mir c and stalin).
As you can see, despite all developers having full-time dayjobs,
The MirOS Project is far from being obsolete. We hope that our website
visitors understand our reasons to not have an exhibition booth of our
own (even if the SPARCstation makes for a way cool one, it s too heavy
to lift all the time), and would like to point out that there are several
other booths (commercial ones, as well as OSS ones such as AllBSD, Debian
and (talking to) others) and other itineries we participate in. This year
both Benny and I have been roped into helping out the conference itself,
too (not exactly unvoluntarily though).
The best way to talk to us is
IRC
during regular European geek hours (i.e. until way too late into the
night which Americans should benefit from), semi-synchronously, or
mailing lists. We sort of expect you
to not be afraid to
RTFM and
look up acronyms you don t understand;
The MirOS Project is not unfriendly but definitely not suited for your
proverbial Aunt Tilly, newbies, desktop users, and people who aren t
at least somewhat capable of using written English (this is by design).