Search Results: "tar"

25 October 2008

Martin-Éric Racine: Atari TT030, Atari Stacy, iMac and SCSI devices for sale

As the title of this blog post indicates, I've got some hardware to sell.

David Welton: Slicehost + Ubuntu Intrepid Upgrade

As I wrote previously, I started looking around for a new hosting provider, as Layered Tech is jacking up their prices too much. This isn't something I consider 'fun', as it will involve a lot of time swapping things over, with the potential for problems, but the amount of money disappearing every month is too much to ignore at this point. After some dithering, I finally went ahead and spent some money for a minimal slice at Slicehost. Linode seems pretty competitive too, but I more or less flipped a mental coin. I was actually ready to go ahead the other day, but I stopped to think some more after seeing that Slicehost has been acquired by Rackspace. In terms of seeing hard working people rewarded for their efforts, I am of course happy for the guys at Slicehost, but it also leaves a few questions: Of course, good things could come out of the deal too, so I decided to put my paranoia aside and test the waters. There are a lot of things to like about a system like Slicehost's: it's relatively quick and easy to set up new slices, fiddle with the resources that each slice has, and so on, compared with a physical server. Furthermore, they have a reputation for not 'overbooking' their servers, which is why I wanted to get away from a VPS in the first place, many years ago. Setting up a slice was very quick and easy, but unfortunately got off to a rough start: their "fraud detection" system had a problem with me being in a different place than my billing address. Luckily, they were very fast at correcting the problem. As an aside, I think that fraud detection is probably best left to the credit card companies, although of course I don't really know their business, so maybe that particular check has saved them some money/frustration in the past. Upgrading the Slicehost Ubuntu to Intrepid In any case, once I got it up and running, I wanted to test out the upgrade to Intrepid, as that's going to be out in less than a week, and I might as well upgrade while I have 'fresh' servers to play with, and prior to installing a bunch of stuff. It went very well. I did a do-release-upgrade -d, hit 'yes' to everything, rebooted, and everything was fine! Admittedly, I don't have anything running on the server yet, so that kept things short and sweet, and didn't require the upgrade of various systems which might have had troubles, but so far so good If you'd like to sign up for Slicehost, it looks like they give you a referral code. Mine can be utilized by going here.

John Goerzen: Crazy Cursor Conspiracy Finally Fully Fixed

So lately I had the bad fortune to type in apt-get install gnome-control-center on my workstation. It pulled in probably a hundred dependencies, but I confirmed installing it, never really looking at that list.

The next day, I had a reason to reboot. When I logged back in, I noticed that my beloved standard X11 cursors had been replaced by some ugly antialiased white cursor theme. I felt as if XP had inched closer to taking over my machine.

I grepped all over $HOME for some indication of what happened. I played with the cursor settings in gnome-control-center's appearance thing, which didn't appear to have any effect. When I logged out, I noticed that the cursor was messed up in kdm of all things, and no amount of restarting it could fix it.

After some grepping in /etc, I realized that I could fix it with this command:

update-alternatives --config x-cursor-theme

And I set it back to /etc/X11/cursors/core.theme. Ahh, happiness restored.

I guess that'll teach me to install bits of gnome on my box. Maybe.

Josselin Mouette: 5 days to win cookies

The Debian bug sprint has started! 27 players registered in the hope to win cookies. The list of players and their assignments can be viewed at the usual place. Good luck to everyone. NB: for those who wonder, the assigned bugs were chosen as the 27 oldest RC bugs without a patch and randomized with shuf.

Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo: Blackerry in Debian

I have uploaded barry package to Debian some hours ago. It is still waiting for NEW processing, so if you want it you will have to download sources from Debian git repo, and compile the package yourself. It has just been accepted into the archive. Barry is a GPL program that will allow you to charge your Blackberry through the USB port, to make backup copies of your device databases, manage contacts and use your BB as a modem. So if you have a BlackBerry device, you can also enjoy it in Debian. Update 26/10/2008: Barry has just been accepted into the archive, so you can get it in every Sid repository mirror. Thanks!

Adrian von Bidder: Trying new technology

Since it's apparently en vogue to change one's way these days, I'm now learning Python (by looking at TurboGears and related technologies), using Emacs as my main editor (so far I was using mostly Perl and vim.) But while indenting with vim was often correct but occasionally annoying, I've found the much-touted autoindenting with Emacs disappointing. Yes, indent-region is cool, and if I hit tab on a line it indents it correctly, and using C-J instead of hitting enter also gives the right result. But why do I have to do all this? When I hit enter I want to have the new line at the correct indenting. When I start a line with “</” in a HTML file I want emacs to automatically run indent-for-tab-command on the closing “>” of this tag (or better yet immediately autocomplete the tag, since in XML there is only one tag to close, right?) (Oh, and btw: I've not found much about Python to dislike to date. So while my Emacs use might be just an episode, I might stick with Python as default scripting language for future projects for a while now. I thought about switching to git from hg as well in this “trying new things” effort but I think I'll leave this for later, since I've not had hg annoy me much so far.)

24 October 2008

Gunnar Wolf: Free Software and the Democratic Construction of the Society

Last Wednesday I went for the first time in many years to FES Iztacala, the UNAM faculty where I worked for four years (1999-2003) and where I have most learnt and advanced in my career so far. I have a very special spot in my heart for Iztacala :-)
But it was not just a nostalgy drive - In no small part, I had not visited Iztacala -despite several invitations- because... It is really far away, in Tlalnepantla, Northern Mexico City (while I live in the South, just by UNAM). It takes me approximately 1.5 hours to get there via public transportation, and I would not venture less than 1 hour travel time by car. So... Having nothing to lose, I decided to go by bike - you can look at my route to get there (OpenStreetMap, SportsTracker) and safely back home (OpenStreetMap, SportsTracker). Some people I have talked with think it was a crazy thing to do - No, I don't feel that, by a long shot. A 26Km ride in slightly under two hours, and back. People insist on thinking that biking in such a large and chaotic city as Mexico is unsafe, dangerous, suicidal... I deeply disagree. Cycling is fun and got me to my destination in almost the same time I would have made by bus. And no, I would not buy four liters of gasoline just to cross my city.
Anyway, I am also happy about the reason that actually got me to go to Iztacala - I submitted a talk+paper I prepared together with Alejandro Miranda to Congreso Internacional Software Libre y Democratizaci n del Conocimiento organized by Universidad Polit cnica Salesiana in Quito, Ecuador. This conference is quite different to those I am used to, as it is quite more formal and academic; it is mainly targetted at social scientists working on understanding our movement. We prepared a talk called Software Libre y la Construcci n Democr tica de la Sociedad - which was accepted, to my amazement.
Neither Alejandro nor I were unable to travel to Ecuador to give the talk, so we arranged to present it via a videoconference call - Which was based on Iztacala. A nice session, although quite different to what I am used to. Our presentation was on a panel setting, under the global Ethical and political dimensions in the Free Software culture, with 20 minutes to present the topic (I am used to preparing one- or two-hour talks), and it was frankly rushed... We "met" with some friends (or were able at least to greet them shortly after the talk) who attended live to the conference, and... Well, all in all, it was one of those good, interesting experiences I would surely repeat. And besides, I have several things pending to show off about my current work to my Iztacalan fellows ;-)

Sandro Tosi: Bits from the reportbug side of Debian

Things are evolving under the hood for reportbug, and we are preparing a version targetted for squeeze.

The version 3.99.0 has just been released to experimental; the main goals for this release are:
Other goals we'd like to archive for the 4.0 version (for which 3.99.x are the pre-releases) are:
Since this is a development version, you can experience some bugs/regressions, so please try it, stress it and "reportbug reportbug" if needed :) You're help is really appreciated! (and we have cookies ;) )

Steve Kemp: Please tell me what you're feeling.

Twice, recently, people have commented on my post titles. I keep a real journal elsewhere where entries are either untitled, or are titled by quotations. In the past I used to keep a running total of who had guessed the source of the quote, but these days that game gets ignored. Titles here used to be song lyrics, but these days they are film quotes. When I started I intended to be a little interesting, and make "happy posts" contain quotes from films I enjoyed watching, and "ironic" or "ranty" posts contain quotes from films I disliked. But that didn't last for long, and I suspect nobody noticed anyway. (Why would they?!) Regardless that's the only explaination I'll give. Once or twice I've had people "complain" :
Your titles have no relationship to your posts. I don't know if your post is a serious one I should read, or a trivial one I should ignore.
To those comments I have several potential response: In short, if you (dis)like what I have to say I'm sure that the title of the post you disagree with is the least important part of that. I'm sure I could say more either way, but since the recent reminder I figured I should write something. I've almost done so several times but I find it hard to be specific. Regardless the summary is:
"I'll keep this up, whether you like it or not, until I get bored. Regardless of how much I might respect you, and your opinion."
PS. tscreen released. Again. ObFilm: Star Trek #2 - Wrath of Khan

John Goerzen: The End of an Era

I bought my first Apple hardware a number of years ago -- a 400MHz titanium Powerbook. The thing came with Mac OS X preloaded, but it was so slow that it was unusable. I put Debian on it, and was mostly happy with it -- until the titanium case started coming apart. Oh, and the small detail that the built-in wifi reception was so poor that I had to use a PCMCIA card to get a signal in some parts of my house.

But ever since then, we've always had some piece of Apple hardware in active use in our house.

About 7 years ago, my main workstation was a rapidly-aging 600MHz Alpha with -- gasp -- PCI video. It was OK for programming but really awfully slow at anything graphical. I was wanting to get into video editing, and we bought an 800 MHz iMac. The kind with the inverted-bowl base. A nice machine at the time. This was going to be my main workstation.

When it arrived at home, I unpacked it. Terah walked in and said, "Wow, my new computer is cute!" So it became *her* computer, and has been ever since.

It's rather old and is showing its age. Its wifi card died a couple of years ago. The 800MHz CPU is slow with today's websites.

So yesterday, we clicked on the apple and shutdown for the last time. It left her desk, replaced with a Linux desktop with a 20" 1600x1200 LCD (replacing the 15" 1024x768). I had assembled this Linux desktop out of spare parts in our basement, with a 4-year-old Athlon XP CPU. It's still faster than her Core 2 Duo work laptop running Vista, but that's another story.

I put Debian lenny on it. And I've got to say -- wow -- the utility of Debian as a desktop OS for the non-geeky has taken an incredible turn for the better in the last few years. Terah was fine with switching to Linux. I set it up for her -- Firefox for web, Thunderbird for mail, J-Pilot for syncing to her Palm, OpenOffice, gajim, etc.

Her concerns were: having Thunderbird make a nice "whoosh" sound when it successfully finished transmitting an email, having desktop gadgets (I installed screenlets, which I think she likes a lot), and.... I don't think I remember any others.

So now we both run Linux on our desktops.

Oh, and on her laptop, I poked around in the Vista control panels (I must have "authorized it to display this panel" a dozen times, stupid thing), and eventually found a box where I could optimize for visual effects or optimize for performance. I hit optimize for performance, and it transformed its interface into approximately Windows 2000 after a couple of seconds. I think that change made it a lot faster. It's now about as fast as the 25%-as-fast Linux box. I guess that's good for Vista.

Christian Perrier: Some news about APT package maintenance

Since I blogged about it, a few things happened around APT maintenance. First of all, it seems that more people got interested in the package. Many even *discovered* that one of our key packages was not that actively maintained. Not everything is really settled, far from that. There is no strong team yet...but some hype happened. A wiki page has been setup (I'm offline right now...just search on wiki.debian.org). Eugene V. Lyubimkin started bug triaging activities and will need help and encouragement (or cookies). Michael Vogt gave some indications about how to contribute to APT. Things happened. And I don't even know if that done by Debian Developers, Debian ontributors or Debian Maintainers. Things just happen and that's good. This is going to help us release lenny, while the two giant threads currently running on -project and -devel will not.

Holger Levsen: Dear DSA FTPMaster Keyring-Maint Secretary FrontDesk DPL

For one, I think it might be a good idea to pause this proposal now. (Reason: lenny)

And I definitly think you should develop it using the DEP procedure. (And not a series of mails to different lists and some blog posts, which is very hard to follow.) And most probably this "you" (delegates) should become a "we" (Debian).

Love, Holger.

P.S.: my changelog form blog engine looks cool, but fails with commata in titles. Gah.

Joerg Jaspert: Developer status

Nice how some people (on purpose?) try to misunderstand everything. And love to flame. (Yes, it was my mistake to not explain the meaning of we right at the top - or in that mail at all -, sorry.) Lets address a few of the issues: There are many more things on the mailing list, but this post is already a little to long, so lets stop for now. I might blog more later on and reply to a bit more. I might also try and reply on the mailinglist, but erm, thats a HUGE thread already… What I won’t reply to are those few people who wish me to die or suffer from something painful. Sorry, I have to disappoint you, none of this is on todays agenda. Comments: 5

Biella Coleman: Hacker practice: Moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism

So I usually don’t announce my publications on my blog and for various reasons. The main one is that I am more than a little embarrassed that some of them are behind walled gardens (but being I am a junior prof, I am not in a position to negotiate otherwise). Otherwise, some of my pieces are semi-jargony (in the academic sense) and may not be of interest to readers who I think are more geek than academic. Finally, the process of publishing is so slow, so long, and so painful, I try not to think about it, much less write about it, if I can help it. But I decided to announce this
piece , which is on hackers (surprise surprise) as it might be of interest to some readers and because people can download it for free here for the rest of the month (but registration is required ) Co-written with Alex Rex Golub, I am pretty happy to see in print although it is far more academic in its tone, argument, and language than most of everything else I have written. This is in part because the article is more theoretical than ethnographic (hence the journal, Anthropological Theory) and tackles the question of liberalism alongside hacking. It seeks to demonstrate that these can be talked about 1) together and in cultural terms 2) that we we can identify some cohesive elements to hacking and liberalism, in part by placing them in conversation with each other 3) and yet we can also locate plurality and diversity within liberalism and hacking as well. This is a lot to tackle and cover in one piece under 35 pages and I am sure it could have been pulled off better but I think it is is a decent start to thinking about these questions. If you are interested but are allergic to academicalese, sticking to the Introduction, the Hacker Ethical Practice: Three Examples section, and Conclusion, will give you a taste of the arguments while avoiding most of the jargon. The irony of this article is that even if it hits at some pretty theoretical issues, it was provoked by a mundane conversation and disagreement I had with one hacker, Karl Fogel, over another hacker, Kevin Mitnick. After returning from the hacker conference, HOPE, I had dinner with Karl and told him about Kevin Mitnick’s keynote speech, which I found particularity enjoyable and entertaining. After calling Mitnick a hacker, Karl responded with the following: Kevin is not hacker. He is a cracker. Though I think I convinced him that cracker may not be the best word for him (and he convinced me there are differences between hacking, noting perceptively that his primary motivation seemed to be getting access to something he wasn’t allowed to have access to that is, it was more about breaking the rules and the thrill of crossing a social line, than about learning a technical system. ), I decided that I wanted to write a piece that squarely addressed tensions and differences among hackers instead of whitewashing them away as most authors, journalist, and even some hackers do.
Although most of the time, it seems like it is the Karl-type hackers who accuse the Mitnick-type hackers of not being true and authentic, recently I have been in a few situations where the tables were turned. For example, last year I was having coffee with a 2600-type who insisted that hacking on Linux was not hacking at all (not innovative enough, according to his world view). Another example I came across was in a recent Phrack issue where the prophiled hacker, the Unix Terrorist, takes a swipe at (well honestly at everyone and everythin) but when he is talking trash about who is and who is not a hacker, he singles out F/OSS developers:
Linus Torvalds isn’t a hacker! Richard Stallman isn’t a hacker! Niels Provos
isn’t a hacker! Fat/ugly, maybe! Hackers, no! And what is up with
the use of the term “cracker”? As far as I’m concerned, that term
applies to people that bypass copyright protection mechanisms.
Vladimir Levin? HACKER. phiber optik? HACKER. Kevin Mitnick? OK,
maybe a gay/bad one, but still WAS a “hacker.” Hope that’s clear.
Of course, one can play the game of defining the authentic hacking (and it makes sense for many to do this!) but my interest as an anthropologist has never been to draw a bright and clear boundary between good hackers and bad hackers. or “real and fake hackers,” but instead to describe and grapple with the tension points and internal ambiguities among hackers (my whole course is designed around this theme, in fact). This is not to say that anything goes in the world of hacking (that is, I don’t consider any computer break in a hack; I often just call it a crime) but if there is a group of people calling themselves hackers and thinking to some degree of the ethical implications of their actions, as an anthropologist, this is enough “social evidence” to start asking some questions about the political and cultural significance of their actions.

David Pashley: Setting up Ubuntu PXE booting

I've recently had to set up a new machine, but didn't have an install cdrom available, so I decided to use the easiest method for installing Ubuntu; PXE booting. Here's how I did it. PXE involves setting up two simple technologies, DHCP and TFTP. We start by setting up TFTP. TFTP is Trivial File Transfer Protocol, a cut down version of FTP. There are a number of TFTP servers in Debian and Ubuntu, but not all of them support the extensions that the pxelinux bootloader used by debian-installer need. Experience has shown that tftpd-hpa works correctly, so we'll want to install that.
ace root% apt-get install tftpd-hpa
Note: If this installs an inetd at the same time, you may need to restart the inetd so it enables the tftpd service. The tftpd will serve files out of /var/lib/tftpboot, so we need to add some files for it to serve. You can use this script to fetch various netboot installers from Ubuntu's servers.
#!/bin/bash
set -u
set -e
cd /var/lib/tftpboot
for dist in dapper feisty gutsy hardy intrepid; do
    mkdir -p $dist
    for arch in amd64 i386; do
        mkdir -p $dist/$arch/
        (cd $dist/$arch/ && ncftpget -RT \
           ftp://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/$dist/main/installer-$arch/current/images/netboot/)
    done
done
Download ubuntu-tftp-update.sh Now we need to alter our dhcpd configuration. (You are using DHCP aren't you?) All we need to add is a group declaration to your subnet declaration, adding a next-server and a filename parameter. You can then add a host declaration for any machine you want to netboot into the installer.
group   # intrepid amd64
     next-server 10.0.0.1;
     filename "intrepid/amd64/pxelinux.0";
     host foobar   hardware ethernet 00:22:15:45:cc:fa; fixed-address foobar.example.com;  
 
You'll need to restart the dhcp server so it picks up the new setting. The next-server parameter is the name or IP address of your tftp server. filename is the path to the bootloader. Obviously, you can use this to pick which version of the installer you want to run. If you do a lot of installations, it might be worth configuring every installer you're likely to use and then move hosts in and out of the suitable group as and when you need to install them. All that's left to do now is to boot the computer and set it to boot from the network and enjoy medialess installation.
Read Comments (1)

23 October 2008

David Welton: Nokia 6120

I finally got around to getting myself a new mobile phone, as it looks like the Android phones may take a while to arrive here in Europe, unlocked, and my old phone was fading. I ended up selecting a Nokia 6120 in order to get something that runs Symbian, which has a decent amount of apps above and beyond the Java ME stuff. So far, I'm fairly happy with the phone. Here are some notes: Oslo Fjord All in all, I'm happy with it, but I think that my next phone will be some kind of Android-based device, as that system is way more hackable than Java ME, and the people developing it seem to 'get it' a bit more. That said, I'm glad I got it - I needed something modern to play with Hecl on, and hopefully I will be able to work on using some of the fancier bits of the phone from Hecl. Oh, and by the way, I'm always on the lookout for phones to try Hecl with - even if they're old and worn out, the only thing that matters is that they are able to run Java ME applications. Contact me for shipping information:-)

Joey Hess: anatomy of an atrocious announcement

Here are some tricks that you can use to ensure that your announcement to debian-devel-announce has maximal negative utility. hide who's talking Make sure that your announcement does not start off by making clear who's speaking. The announcement will have a From line with your name on it, and that's good enough. Everyone knows who you are, what groups you're a member of, and can guess what group you're speaking for ... or whether you're just speaking for yourself. Throughout the annoucement, be use to use terms like "We plan", "let us describe", "we are considering", "This is where our proposal comes in.", etc. Maybe in a footnote include a clue such as a mention of "the NM-Committee", but be sure to not sign the announcement with the name of any group or team or set of people, so that the reader is left guessing about who this "we" is all the way to the end and beyond. (And hey, "cabal" is a fun word.) weasel words Scatter throughout the announcement some vaguely worded digs at things you disagree with. The key here is to make clear what you really mean, while providing enough plausible deniability that you can deny having said it later. So you might say ...
Some time ago a few Developers thus went and pushed forward the "Debian Maintainer" status.
... Thus implying that this was a few malcontents who should be ignored. Sure, the whole project voted for this, and so you should be sure to allude to that vote somewhere else. Maybe in a different paragraph entirely, you could refer to "Debian Maintainers (DM) [GR-DM]". (It would be excessive to have that footnote refer to a bogus url like http://vote.debian.org/something.) the big lie Make sure that your announcement starts off all bright and cheery on the surface, with just a hint of deadly steel jaws underneath. Something like:
If you are an existing Debian Developer or Debian Maintainer, don't be afraid, we are not going to take anything away from you.
Natter on for many, many pages of trivilities, good ideas, bad ideas, half-baked ideas, conflicting acronyms, and useless footnotes. Then spring the trap:
In future this will be a list maintained by the NM-committee. At the time of migrating from the old to the new way, Ftpmaster will convert the existing DM-Upload-Allowed fields into that list, so there should be no interruption in your ability to upload.
And ability to upload is all that matters. Who cares about the regression back to the tyranny of unix permissions? Who cares that DDs won't be able to decide when they trust a DM to upload their package, or that DMs won't be able to sign up quickly and easily, or that DMs will have to petition a disinterested committe to change anything? Nothing will have changed, nothing will be taken away, nothing to see here, move along: The big lie.

Chris Lawrence: Bust a move

I enjoyed last night’s episode of Mythbusters for a variety of reasons. For starters, I now have Smart Board Envy™, projectiles and explosions are always fun, and seeing Adam, Jamie, and Kari drunk was a hoot. The social scientist in me, though, really enjoyed the “beer goggles” experiment. In fact, the show, edited down to just include that section, would make a great primer on “how social scientific experiments work” for my undergraduate methods course when I teach it again, presumably next fall. On the other hand, I was less thrilled with the “sobering up” experiment, but the comedy factor of drunken Adam trying to run on a treadmill without a handrail, with all-too-predictable results, made up for the scientific shortcomings therein.

Adam Rosi-Kessel: Republic National Committee Helps Obama Fundraising

The only plausible result from this RNC mailing, I think, is increased fundraising for Obama over the next few days:
Terrorists Dont Care Who They Hurt

"Terrorists Don't Care Who They Hurt"

For the nearsighted, the front of the mailing says “Terrorists Don’t Care Who They Hurt” and inside: “Why Should We Care What They Have to Say? … Barack Obama. Not Who You Think He Is.” I would be surprised if the Obama campaign doesn’t get a measurable bump in donations for every mailing like this. What I really wonder is how intelligent Republican party members tolerate this sort of thing. Aside from Colin Powell, are other high-IQ Republicans voting against their party because of these tactics? Or do they just believe any means justify the ends? My pet theory as to why these attacks are useless (at best) to the GOP is that they don’t resonate with anything the voters are seeing. The GOP implies Obama is a muslim terrorist who is inexperienced and risky and also an extreme liberal/socialist left-winger (I haven’t heard “communist” yet from the mainstream), while what the electorate sees in the debates, ads, and campaign appearances is an uncannily steady, balanced, articulate individual who comes across as a moderate on most issues (note Obama’s theme of returning to Reagan-era taxation levels!) At least with the “flip-flopper” attacks (and maybe even the Swift-Boat attacks) on John Kerry, there was something people could see that somewhat corresponded with the attacks, even if the underlying facts didn’t actually pan out. Here, the chasm between the nature of the attacks and the visible target is so great, they could only help energize those who are already hard-core partisans. The lesson here is that if you want to launch misleading, baseless attacks against your opponent, at least find some kernel of truth to base them on. On a similar note, I agree with Aaron Swartz that ACORN deserves our financial support. Finally, I predict a bunch of astroturf comments to this blog entry. I won’t bother to respond if the comments fail to say anything intelligible. Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Adam Rosi-Kessel: Republic National Committee Helps Obama Fundraising

The only plausible result from this RNC mailing, I think, is increased fundraising for Obama over the next few days:
Terrorists Dont Care Who They Hurt

"Terrorists Don't Care Who They Hurt"

For the nearsighted, the front of the mailing says “Terrorists Don’t Care Who They Hurt” and inside: “Why Should We Care What They Have to Say? … Barack Obama. Not Who You Think He Is.” I would be surprised if the Obama campaign doesn’t get a measurable bump in donations for every mailing like this. What I really wonder is how intelligent Republican party members tolerate this sort of thing. Aside from Colin Powell, are other high-IQ Republicans voting against their party because of these tactics? Or do they just believe any means justify the ends? My pet theory as to why these attacks are useless (at best) to the GOP is that they don’t resonate with anything the voters are seeing. The GOP implies Obama is a muslim terrorist who is inexperienced and risky and also an extreme liberal/socialist left-winger (I haven’t heard “communist” yet from the mainstream), while what the electorate sees in the debates, ads, and campaign appearances is an uncannily steady, balanced, articulate individual who comes across as a moderate on most issues (note Obama’s theme of returning to Reagan-era taxation levels!) At least with the “flip-flopper” attacks (and maybe even the Swift-Boat attacks) on John Kerry, there was something people could see that somewhat corresponded with the attacks, even if the underlying facts didn’t actually pan out. Here, the chasm between the nature of the attacks and the visible target is so great, they could only help energize those who are already hard-core partisans. The lesson here is that if you want to launch misleading, baseless attacks against your opponent, at least find some kernel of truth to base them on. On a similar note, I agree with Aaron Swartz that ACORN deserves our financial support. Finally, I predict a bunch of astroturf comments to this blog entry. I won’t bother to respond if the comments fail to say anything intelligible. Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Next.

Previous.