Search Results: "spa"

2 February 2023

John Goerzen: Using Yggdrasil As an Automatic Mesh Fabric to Connect All Your Docker Containers, VMs, and Servers

Sometimes you might want to run Docker containers on more than one host. Maybe you want to run some at one hosting facility, some at another, and so forth. Maybe you d like run VMs at various places, and let them talk to Docker containers and bare metal servers wherever they are. And maybe you d like to be able to easily migrate any of these from one provider to another. There are all sorts of very complicated ways to set all this stuff up. But there s also a simple one: Yggdrasil. My blog post Make the Internet Yours Again With an Instant Mesh Network explains some of the possibilities of Yggdrasil in general terms. Here I want to show you how to use Yggdrasil to solve some of these issues more specifically. Because Yggdrasil is always Encrypted, some of the security lifting is done for us.

Background Often in Docker, we connect multiple containers to a single network that runs on a given host. That much is easy. Once you start talking about containers on multiple hosts, then you start adding layers and layers of complexity. Once you start talking multiple providers, maybe multiple continents, then the complexity can increase. And, if you want to integrate everything from bare metal servers to VMs into this well, there are ways, but they re not easy. I m a believer in the KISS principle. Let s not make things complex when we don t have to.

Enter Yggdrasil As I ve explained before, Yggdrasil can automatically form a global mesh network. This is pretty cool! As most people use it, they join it to the main Yggdrasil network. But Yggdrasil can be run entirely privately as well. You can run your own private mesh, and that s what we ll talk about here. All we have to do is run Yggdrasil inside each container, VM, server, or whatever. We handle some basics of connectivity, and bam! Everything is host- and location-agnostic.

Setup in Docker The installation of Yggdrasil on a regular system is pretty straightforward. Docker is a bit more complicated for several reasons:
  • It blocks IPv6 inside containers by default
  • The default set of permissions doesn t permit you to set up tunnels inside a container
  • It doesn t typically pass multicast (broadcast) packets
Normally, Yggdrasil could auto-discover peers on a LAN interface. However, aside from some esoteric Docker networking approaches, Docker doesn t permit that. So my approach is going to be setting up one or more Yggdrasil router containers on a given Docker host. All the other containers talk directly to the router container and it s all good.

Basic installation In my Dockerfile, I have something like this:
FROM jgoerzen/debian-base-security:bullseye
RUN echo "deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list && \
    apt-get --allow-releaseinfo-change update && \
    apt-get -y --no-install-recommends -t bullseye-backports install yggdrasil
...
COPY yggdrasil.conf /etc/yggdrasil/
RUN set -x; \
    chown root:yggdrasil /etc/yggdrasil/yggdrasil.conf && \
    chmod 0750 /etc/yggdrasil/yggdrasil.conf && \
    systemctl enable yggdrasil
The magic parameters to docker run to make Yggdrasil work are:
--cap-add=NET_ADMIN --sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=0 --device=/dev/net/tun:/dev/net/tun
This example uses my docker-debian-base images, so if you use them as well, you ll also need to add their parameters. Note that it is NOT necessary to use --privileged. In fact, due to the network namespaces in use in Docker, this command does not let the container modify the host s networking (unless you use --net=host, which I do not recommend). The --sysctl parameter was the result of a lot of banging my head against the wall. Apparently Docker tries to disable IPv6 in the container by default. Annoying.

Configuration of the router container(s) The idea is that the router node (or more than one, if you want redundancy) will be the only ones to have an open incoming port. Although the normal Yggdrasil case of directly detecting peers in a broadcast domain is more convenient and more robust, this can work pretty well too. You can, of course, generate a template yggdrasil.conf with yggdrasil -genconf like usual. Some things to note for this one:
  • You ll want to change Listen to something like Listen: ["tls://[::]:12345"] where 12345 is the port number you ll be listening on.
  • You ll want to disable the MulticastInterfaces entirely by just setting it to [] since it doesn t work anyway.
  • If you expose the port to the Internet, you ll certainly want to firewall it to only authorized peers. Setting AllowedPublicKeys is another useful step.
  • If you have more than one router container on a host, each of them will both Listen and act as a client to the others. See below.

Configuration of the non-router nodes Again, you can start with a simple configuration. Some notes here:
  • You ll want to set Peers to something like Peers: ["tls://routernode:12345"] where routernode is the Docker hostname of the router container, and 12345 is its port number as defined above. If you have more than one local router container, you can simply list them all here. Yggdrasil will then fail over nicely if any one of them go down.
  • Listen should be empty.
  • As above, MulticastInterfaces should be empty.

Using the interfaces At this point, you should be able to ping6 between your containers. If you have multiple hosts running Docker, you can simply set up the router nodes on each to connect to each other. Now you have direct, secure, container-to-container communication that is host-agnostic! You can also set up Yggdrasil on a bare metal server or VM using standard procedures and everything will just talk nicely!

Security notes Yggdrasil s mesh is aggressively greedy. It will peer with any node it can find (unless told otherwise) and will find a route to anywhere it can. There are two main ways to make sure your internal comms stay private: by restricting who can talk to your mesh, and by firewalling the Yggdrasil interface. Both can be used, and they can be used simultaneously. By disabling multicast discovery, you eliminate the chance for random machines on the LAN to join the mesh. By making sure that you firewall off (outside of Yggdrasil) who can connect to a Yggdrasil node with a listening port, you can authorize only your own machines. And, by setting AllowedPublicKeys on the nodes with listening ports, you can authenticate the Yggdrasil peers. Note that part of the benefit of the Yggdrasil mesh is normally that you don t have to propagate a configuration change to every participatory node that s a nice thing in general! You can also run a firewall inside your container (I like firehol for this purpose) and aggressively firewall the IPs that are allowed to connect via the Yggdrasil interface. I like to set a stable interface name like ygg0 in yggdrasil.conf, and then it becomes pretty easy to firewall the services. The Docker parameters that allow Yggdrasil to run are also sufficient to run firehol.

Naming Yggdrasil peers You probably don t want to hard-code Yggdrasil IPs all over the place. There are a few solutions:
  • You could run an internal DNS service
  • You can do a bit of scripting around Docker s --add-host command to add things to /etc/hosts

Other hints & conclusion Here are some other helpful use cases:
  • If you are migrating between hosts, you could leave your reverse proxy up at both hosts, both pointing to the target containers over Yggdrasil. The targets will be automatically found from both sides of the migration while you wait for DNS caches to update and such.
  • This can make services integrate with local networks a lot more painlessly than they might otherwise.
This is just an idea. The point of Yggdrasil is expanding our ideas of what we can do with a network, so here s one such expansion. Have fun!
Note: This post also has a permanent home on my webiste, where it may be periodically updated.

1 February 2023

Simon Josefsson: Apt Archive Transparency: debdistdiff & apt-canary

I ve always found the operation of apt software package repositories to be a mystery. There appears to be a lack of transparency into which people have access to important apt package repositories out there, how the automatic non-human update mechanism is implemented, and what changes are published. I m thinking of big distributions like Ubuntu and Debian, but also the free GNU/Linux distributions like Trisquel and PureOS that are derived from the more well-known distributions. As far as I can tell, anyone who has the OpenPGP private key trusted by a apt-based GNU/Linux distribution can sign a modified Release/InRelease file and if my machine somehow downloads that version of the release file, my machine could be made to download and install packages that the distribution didn t intend me to install. Further, it seems that anyone who has access to the main HTTP server, or any of its mirrors, or is anywhere on the network between them and my machine (when plaintext HTTP is used), can either stall security updates on my machine (on a per-IP basis), or use it to send my machine (again, on a per-IP basis to avoid detection) a modified Release/InRelease file if they had been able to obtain the private signing key for the archive. These are mighty powers that warrant overview. I ve always put off learning about the processes to protect the apt infrastructure, mentally filing it under so many people rely on this infrastructure that enough people are likely to have invested time reviewing and improving these processes . Simultaneous, I ve always followed the more free-software friendly Debian-derived distributions such as gNewSense and have run it on some machines. I ve never put them into serious production use, because the trust issues with their apt package repositories has been a big question mark for me. The enough people part of my rationale for deferring this is not convincing. Even the simple question of is someone updating the apt repository is not easy to understand on a running gNewSense system. At some point in time the gNewSense cron job to pull in security updates from Debian must have stopped working, and I wouldn t have had any good mechanism to notice that. Most likely it happened without any public announcement. I ve recently switched to Trisquel on production machines, and these questions has come back to haunt me. The situation is unsatisfying and I looked into what could be done to improve it. I could try to understand who are the key people involved in each project, and may even learn what hardware component is used, or what software is involved to update and sign apt repositories. Is the server running non-free software? Proprietary BIOS or NIC firmware? Are the GnuPG private keys on disk? Smartcard? TPM? YubiKey? HSM? Where is the server co-located, and who has access to it? I tried to do a bit of this, and discovered things like Trisquel having a DSA1024 key in its default apt trust store (although for fairness, it seems that apt by default does not trust such signatures). However, I m not certain understanding this more would scale to securing my machines against attacks on this infrastructure. Even people with the best intentions, and the state of the art hardware and software, will have problems. To increase my trust in Trisquel I set out to understand how it worked. To make it easier to sort out what the interesting parts of the Trisquel archive to audit further were, I created debdistdiff to produce human readable text output comparing one apt archive with another apt archive. There is a GitLab CI/CD cron job that runs this every day, producing output comparing Trisquel vs Ubuntu and PureOS vs Debian. Working with these output files has made me learn more about how the process works, and I even stumbled upon something that is likely a bug where Trisquel aramo was imported from Ubuntu jammy while it contained a couple of package (e.g., gcc-8, python3.9) that were removed for the final Ubuntu jammy release. After working on auditing the Trisquel archive manually that way, I realized that whatever I could tell from comparing Trisquel with Ubuntu, it would only be something based on a current snapshot of the archives. Tomorrow it may look completely different. What felt necessary was to audit the differences of the Trisquel archive continously. I was quite happy to have developed debdistdiff for one purpose (comparing two different archives like Trisquel and Ubuntu) and discovered that the tool could be used for another purpose (comparing the Trisquel archive at two different points in time). At this time I realized that I needed a log of all different apt archive metadata to be able to produce an audit log of the differences in time for the archive. I create manually curated git-repositories with the Release/InRelease and the Packages files for each architecture/component of the well-known distributions Trisquel, Ubuntu, Debian and PureOS. Eventually I wrote scripts to automate this, which are now published in the debdistget project. At this point, one of the early question about per-IP substitution of Release files were lingering in my mind. However with the tooling I now had available, coming up with a way to resolve this was simple! Merely have apt compute a SHA256 checksum of the just downloaded InRelease file, and see if my git repository had the same file. At this point I started reading the Apt source code, and now I had more doubts about the security of my systems than I ever had before. Oh boy how the name Apt has never before felt more Apt?! Oh well, we must leave some exercises for the students. Eventually I realized I wanted to touch as little of apt code basis as possible, and noticed the SigVerify::CopyAndVerify function called ExecGPGV which called apt-key verify which called GnuPG s gpgv. By setting Apt::Key::gpgvcommand I could get apt-key verify to call another tool than gpgv. See where I m going? I thought wrapping this up would now be trivial but for some reason the hash checksum I computed locally never matched what was on my server. I gave up and started working on other things instead. Today I came back to this idea, and started to debug exactly how the local files looked that I got from apt and how they differed from what I had in my git repositories, that came straight from the apt archives. Eventually I traced this back to SplitClearSignedFile which takes an InRelease file and splits it into two files, probably mimicking the (old?) way of distributing both Release and Release.gpg. So the clearsigned InRelease file is split into one cleartext file (similar to the Release file) and one OpenPGP signature file (similar to the Release.gpg file). But why didn t the cleartext variant of the InRelease file hash to the same value as the hash of the Release file? Sadly they differ by the final newline. Having solved this technicality, wrapping the pieces up was easy, and I came up with a project apt-canary that provides a script apt-canary-gpgv that verify the local apt release files against something I call a apt canary witness file stored at a URL somewhere. I m now running apt-canary on my Trisquel aramo laptop, a Trisquel nabia server, and Talos II ppc64el Debian machine. This means I have solved the per-IP substitution worries (or at least made them less likely to occur, having to send the same malicious release files to both GitLab and my system), and allow me to have an audit log of all release files that I actually use for installing and downloading packages. What do you think? There are clearly a lot of work and improvements to be made. This is a proof-of-concept implementation of an idea, but instead of refining it until perfection and delaying feedback, I wanted to publish this to get others to think about the problems and various ways to resolve them. Btw, I m going to be at FOSDEM 23 this weekend, helping to manage the Security Devroom. Catch me if you want to chat about this or other things. Happy Hacking!

Julian Andres Klode: Ubuntu 2022v1 secure boot key rotation and friends

This is the story of the currently progressing changes to secure boot on Ubuntu and the history of how we got to where we are.

taking a step back: how does secure boot on Ubuntu work? Booting on Ubuntu involves three components after the firmware:
  1. shim
  2. grub
  3. linux
Each of these is a PE binary signed with a key. The shim is signed by Microsoft s 3rd party key and embeds a self-signed Canonical CA certificate, and optionally a vendor dbx (a list of revoked certificates or binaries). grub and linux (and fwupd) are then signed by a certificate issued by that CA In Ubuntu s case, the CA certificate is sharded: Multiple people each have a part of the key and they need to meet to be able to combine it and sign things, such as new code signing certificates.

BootHole When BootHole happened in 2020, travel was suspended and we hence could not rotate to a new signing certificate. So when it came to updating our shim for the CVEs, we had to revoke all previously signed kernels, grubs, shims, fwupds by their hashes. This generated a very large vendor dbx which caused lots of issues as shim exported them to a UEFI variable, and not everyone had enough space for such large variables. Sigh. We decided we want to rotate our signing key next time. This was also when upstream added SBAT metadata to shim and grub. This gives a simple versioning scheme for security updates and easy revocation using a simple EFI variable that shim writes to and reads from.

Spring 2022 CVEs We still were not ready for travel in 2021, but during BootHole we developed the SBAT mechanism, so one could revoke a grub or shim by setting a single EFI variable. We actually missed rotating the shim this cycle as a new vulnerability was reported immediately after it, and we decided to hold on to it.

2022 key rotation and the fall CVEs This caused some problems when the 2nd CVE round came, as we did not have a shim with the latest SBAT level, and neither did a lot of others, so we ended up deciding upstream to not bump the shim SBAT requirements just yet. Sigh. Anyway, in October we were meeting again for the first time at a Canonical sprint, and the shardholders got together and created three new signing keys: 2022v1, 2022v2, and 2022v3. It took us until January before they were installed into the signing service and PPAs setup to sign with them. We also submitted a shim 15.7 with the old keys revoked which came back at around the same time. Now we were in a hurry. The 22.04.2 point release was scheduled for around middle of February, and we had nothing signed with the new keys yet, but our new shim which we need for the point release (so the point release media remains bootable after the next round of CVEs), required new keys. So how do we ensure that users have kernels, grubs, and fwupd signed with the new key before we install the new shim?

upgrade ordering grub and fwupd are simple cases: For grub, we depend on the new version. We decided to backport grub 2.06 to all releases (which moved focal and bionic up from 2.04), and kept the versioning of the -signed packages the same across all releases, so we were able to simply bump the Depends for grub to specify the new minimum version. For fwupd-efi, we added Breaks. (Actually, we also had a backport of the CVEs for 2.04 based grub, and we did publish that for 20.04 signed with the old keys before backporting 2.06 to it.) Kernels are a different story: There are about 60 kernels out there. My initial idea was that we could just add Breaks for all of them. So our meta package linux-image-generic which depends on linux-image-$(uname -r)-generic, we d simply add Breaks: linux-image-generic ( 5.19.0-31) and then adjust those breaks for each series. This would have been super annoying, but ultimately I figured this would be the safest option. This however caused concern, because it could be that apt decides to remove the kernel metapackage. I explored checking the kernels at runtime and aborting if we don t have a trusted kernel in preinst. This ensures that if you try to upgrade shim without having a kernel, it would fail to install. But this ultimately has a couple of issues:
  1. It aborts the entire transaction at that point, so users will be unable to run apt upgrade until they have a recent kernel.
  2. We cannot even guarantee that a kernel would be unpacked first. So even if you got a new kernel, apt/dpkg might attempt to unpack it first and then the preinst would fail because no kernel is present yet.
Ultimately we believed the danger to be too large given that no kernels had yet been released to users. If we had kernels pushed out for 1-2 months already, this would have been a viable choice. So in the end, I ended up modifying the shim packaging to install both the latest shim and the previous one, and an update-alternatives alternative to select between the two: In it s post-installation maintainer script, shim-signed checks whether all kernels with a version greater or equal to the running one are not revoked, and if so, it will setup the latest alternative with priority 100 and the previous with a priority of 50. If one or more of those kernels was signed with a revoked key, it will swap the priorities around, so that the previous version is preferred. Now this is fairly static, and we do want you to switch to the latest shim eventually, so I also added hooks to the kernel install to trigger the shim-signed postinst script when a new kernel is being installed. It will then update the alternatives based on the current set of kernels, and if it now points to the latest shim, reinstall shim and grub to the ESP. Ultimately this means that once you install your 2nd non-revoked kernel, or you install a non-revoked kernel and then reconfigure shim or the kernel, you will get the latest shim. When you install your first non-revoked kernel, your currently booted kernel is still revoked, so it s not upgraded immediately. This has a benefit in that you will most likely have two kernels you can boot without disabling secure boot.

regressions Of course, the first version I uploaded had still some remaining hardcoded shimx64 in the scripts and so failed to install on arm64 where shimaa64 is used. And if that were not enough, I also forgot to include support for gzip compressed kernels there. Sigh, I need better testing infrastructure to be able to easily run arm64 tests as well (I only tested the actual booting there, not the scripts). shim-signed migrated to the release pocket in lunar fairly quickly, but this caused images to stop working, because the new shim was installed into images, but no kernel was available yet, so we had to demote it to proposed and block migration. Despite all the work done for end users, we need to be careful to roll this out for image building.

another grub update for OOM issues. We had two grubs to release: First there was the security update for the recent set of CVEs, then there also was an OOM issue for large initrds which was blocking critical OEM work. We fixed the OOM issue by cherry-picking all 2.12 memory management patches, as well as the red hat patches to the loader we take from there. This ended up a fairly large patch set and I was hesitant to tie the security update to that, so I ended up pushing the security update everywhere first, and then pushed the OOM fixes this week. With the OOM patches, you should be able to boot initrds of between 400M and 1GB, it also depends on the memory layout of your machine and your screen resolution and background images. So OEM team had success testing 400MB irl, and I tested up to I think it was 1.2GB in qemu, I ran out of FAT space then and stopped going higher :D

other features in this round
  • Intel TDX support in grub and shim
  • Kernels are allocated as CODE now not DATA as per the upstream mm changes, might fix boot on X13s

am I using this yet? The new signing keys are used in:
  • shim-signed 1.54 on 22.10+, 1.51.3 on 22.04, 1.40.9 on 20.04, 1.37~18.04.13 on 18.04
  • grub2-signed 1.187.2~ or newer (binary packages grub-efi-amd64-signed or grub-efi-arm64-signed), 1.192 on 23.04.
  • fwupd-signed 1.51~ or newer
  • various linux updates. Check apt changelog linux-image-unsigned-$(uname -r) to see if Revoke & rotate to new signing key (LP: #2002812) is mentioned in there to see if it signed with the new key.
If you were able to install shim-signed, your grub and fwupd-efi will have the correct version as that is ensured by packaging. However your shim may still point to the old one. To check which shim will be used by grub-install, you can check the status of the shimx64.efi.signed or (on arm64) shimaa64.efi.signed alternative. The best link needs to point to the file ending in latest:
$ update-alternatives --display shimx64.efi.signed
shimx64.efi.signed - auto mode
  link best version is /usr/lib/shim/shimx64.efi.signed.latest
  link currently points to /usr/lib/shim/shimx64.efi.signed.latest
  link shimx64.efi.signed is /usr/lib/shim/shimx64.efi.signed
/usr/lib/shim/shimx64.efi.signed.latest - priority 100
/usr/lib/shim/shimx64.efi.signed.previous - priority 50
If it does not, but you have installed a new kernel compatible with the new shim, you can switch immediately to the new shim after rebooting into the kernel by running dpkg-reconfigure shim-signed. You ll see in the output if the shim was updated, or you can check the output of update-alternatives as you did above after the reconfiguration has finished. For the out of memory issues in grub, you need grub2-signed 1.187.3~ (same binaries as above).

how do I test this (while it s in proposed)?
  1. upgrade your kernel to proposed and reboot into that
  2. upgrade your grub-efi-amd64-signed, shim-signed, fwupd-signed to proposed.
If you already upgraded your shim before your kernel, don t worry:
  1. upgrade your kernel and reboot
  2. run dpkg-reconfigure shim-signed
And you ll be all good to go.

deep dive: uploading signed boot assets to Ubuntu For each signed boot asset, we build one version in the latest stable release and the development release. We then binary copy the built binaries from the latest stable release to older stable releases. This process ensures two things: We know the next stable release is able to build the assets and we also minimize the number of signed assets. OK, I lied. For shim, we actually do not build in the development release but copy the binaries upward from the latest stable, as each shim needs to go through external signing. The entire workflow looks something like this:
  1. Upload the unsigned package to one of the following build PPAs:
  2. Upload the signed package to the same PPA
  3. For stable release uploads:
    • Copy the unsigned package back across all stable releases in the PPA
    • Upload the signed package for stable releases to the same PPA with ~<release>.1 appended to the version
  4. Submit a request to canonical-signing-jobs to sign the uploads. The signing job helper copies the binary -unsigned packages to the primary-2022v1 PPA where they are signed, creating a signing tarball, then it copies the source package for the -signed package to the same PPA which then downloads the signing tarball during build and places the signed assets into the -signed deb. Resulting binaries will be placed into the proposed PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/proposed
  5. Review the binaries themselves
  6. Unembargo and binary copy the binaries from the proposed PPA to the proposed-public PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/proposed-public. This step is not strictly necessary, but it enables tools like sru-review to work, as they cannot access the packages from the normal private proposed PPA.
  7. Binary copy from proposed-public to the proposed queue(s) in the primary archive
Lots of steps!

WIP As of writing, only the grub updates have been released, other updates are still being verified in proposed. An update for fwupd in bionic will be issued at a later point, removing the EFI bits from the fwupd 1.2 packaging and using the separate fwupd-efi project instead like later release series.

Paul Wise: FLOSS Activities January 2023

Focus This month I didn't have any particular focus. I just worked on issues in my info bubble.

Changes

Issues

Review

Administration
  • Debian BTS: unarchive/reopen/triage bugs for reintroduced packages cycle/pygopherd and ask about guile-2.2 reintroduction bugs
  • Debian IRC: fix topic/info of obsolete channel
  • Debian wiki: unblock IP addresses, approve accounts, approve domains.

Communication
  • Respond to queries from Debian users and contributors on the mailing lists and IRC

Sponsors The celery, docutils, pyemd work was sponsored. All other work was done on a volunteer basis.

31 January 2023

Dirk Eddelbuettel: #39: Faster Feedback Systems A Continuous Integration Example

Welcome to the 39th post in the relatively randomly recurring rants, or R4 for short. Today s post picks up where the previous post #38: Faster Feedback Systems started. As we argued in #38, the need for fast feedback loops is fairly universal and widespread. Fairly shortly after we posted #38, useR! 2022 happened and one presentation had the key line
Waiting 1-24 minutes for a build to finish can be a massive time suck.
which we would like to come back to today. Furthermore, the unimitable @b0rk had a fabulous tweet just weeks later stating the same point debugging strategy: shorten your feedback loop as a key in a successful debugging strategy. So in sum: shorter is better. Nobody likes to wait. And shorter i.e. faster is a key and recurrent theme in the R4 series. Today we have a fairly nice illustration of two aspects we have stressed before: The combined effects can be staggering as we show below. The example is motivated by a truly surprising (we are being generous here) comment we received as an aside when discussing the eternal topic of whether R users do, or do not, have a choice when picking packages, or approaches, or verses. To our surprise, we were told that packages are not substitutable . Which is both demonstrably false (see below) and astonishing as it came from an academic. I.e. someone trained and paid to abstract superfluous detail away and recognise and compare core features of items under investigation. Truly stunning. But I digress. CRAN by now has many packages, slowly moving in on 20,000 in total, and is a unique success we commented-on time and time before. By now many packages shadow or duplicate each other, reinvent one another, or revise/review. One example is the pair of packages accessing PostgreSQL databases. There are several, but two are key. The older one is RPostgreSQL which has been around since Sameer Kumar Prayaga wrote it as a Google Summer of Code student in 2008 under my mentorship. The package has now been maintained well (if quietly) for many years by Tomoaki Nishiyama. The other entrant is more recent, though not new, and is RPostgres by Kirill M ller and others. We will for the remainder of this post refer to these two as the tiny and the tidy version as either can been as being a representative of a certain verse . The aforementioned comment on non-substitutability struck us as eminently silly, so we set out to prove just how absurd it really is. So about a year ago we set up pair of GitHub repos with minimal code in a pair we called lim-tiny and lim-tidy. Our conjecture was (and is!) that less is more just as post #34 titled Less Is More argued with respect to package dependencies. Each of the repos just does one thing: a query to a (freely accessible but remote) PostgreSQL database. The tiny version just retrieves a data frame using only the dependencies needed for RPostgreSQL namely DBI and nothing else. The tidy version retrieves a tibble and has access to everything else that comes when installing RPostgres: DBI, dplyr, and magrittr plus of course their respective dependencies. We were able to let the code run in (very default) GitHub Actions on a weekly schedule without intervention apart from one change to the SQL query when the remote server (providing public bioinformatics data) changed its schema slighly, plus one update to the action yaml code version. No other changes. We measure the time a standard continuous integration run takes in total using the default GitHub Action setup in the tidy case (which relies on RSPM/PPM binaries, caching, , and does not rebuild from source each time), and our own r-ci script (introduced in #32 for CI with R. It switched to using r2u during the course of this experiment but already had access to binaries via c2d4u so it is always binaries-based (see e.g. #37 or #13 for more). The chart shows the evolution of these run-times over the course of the year with one weekly run each.
tiny vs tidy ci timing impact chart tiny vs tidy ci timing impact chart
This study reveals a few things: The key point there is that while the net-time to fire off a single PostgreSQL is likely (near-)identical, the net cost of continuous integration is not. In this setup, it is about twice the run-time simply because Less Is More which (in this setup) comes out to about being twice as fast. And that is a valid (and concrete, and verifiable) illustration of the overall implicit cost of adding dependencies to creating and using development, test, or run-time environments. Faster feedback loops make for faster builds and faster debugging. Consider using fewer dependencies, and/or using binaries as provided by r2u.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

30 January 2023

Arturo Borrero Gonz lez: Debian and the adventure of the screen resolution

Post logo I read somewhere a nice meme about Linux: Do you want an operating system or do you want an adventure? I love it, because it is so true. What you are about to read is my adventure to set a usable screen resolution in a fresh Debian testing installation. The context is that I have two different Lenovo Thinkpad laptops with 16 screen and nvidia graphic cards. They are both installed with the latest Debian testing. I use the closed-source nvidia drivers (they seem to work better than the nouveau module). The desktop manager and environment that I use is lightdm + XFCE4. The monitor native resolution in both machines is very high: 3840x2160 (or 4K UHD if you will). The thing is that both laptops show an identical problem: when freshly installed with the Debian default config, the native resolution is in use. For a 16 screen laptop, this high resolution means that the font is tiny. Therefore, the raw native resolution renders the machine almost unusable. This is a picture of what you get by running htop in the console (tty1, the terminal you would get by hitting CTRL+ALT+F1) with the default install: Linux tty console with high resolution and tiny fonts Everything in the system is affected by this:
  1. the grub menu is unreadable. Thanksfully the right option is selected by default.
  2. the tty console, with the boot splash by systemd is unreadable as well. There are some colors, so you at least see some systemd stuff happening in green .
  3. when lightdm starts, the resolution keeps being very high. Can barely click the login button.
  4. when XFCE4 starts, it is a pain to navigate the menu and click the right buttons to set a more reasonable resolution.
The adventure begins after installing the system. Each of these four points must be fixed by hand by the user. XFCE4 Point #4 is the easiest. Navigate with the mouse pointer to the tiny Applications menu, then Settings, then Displays. This is more or less the same in every other desktop operating system. There are no further actions required to persist this setting. Thanks you XFCE4. lightdm Point #3, about lightdm, is more tricky to solve. It involves running xrandr when lightdm sets up the display. Nobody will tell you this trick. You have to search for it on the internet. Thankfully is a common problem, and a person who knows what to search for can find good results. The file /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf needs to contain something like this:
[LightDM]
[Seat:*]
# set up correct display resolution
display-setup-script=sh -c -- "xrandr -s 1920x1080"
By the way, depending on your system hardware setup, you may also need an additional call to xrandr here. If you want to plug in an HDMI monitor, chances are you require something like xrandr --setprovideroutputsource NVIDIA-G0 modesetting && xrandr --auto to instruct the NVIDIA graphic card to work will with the kernel graphic system. In my case, one of my laptops require it, so I have:
[LightDM]
[Seat:*]
# don't ask me to type my username
greeter-hide-users=false
# set up correct display resolution, and prepare NVIDIA card for HDMI output
display-setup-script=sh -c "xrandr -s 1920x1080 && xrandr --setprovideroutputsource NVIDIA-G0 modesetting && xrandr --auto"
grub Point #1 about the grub menu is also not trivial to solve, but also widely known on the internet. Grub allows you to set arbitrary graphical modes. In Debian systems, adding something like GRUB_GFXMODE=1024x768 to /etc/default/grub and then running sudo update-grub should do the magic. console So we get to point #2 about the tty1 console. For months, I ve been investing my scarce personal time into trying to solve this annoyance. There are a lot of conflicting information about this on the internet. Plenty of misleading solutions, essays about framebuffer, kernel modeset, and other stuff I don t want to read just to get my tty1 in a readable status. People point in different directions, like using GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=keep in /etc/default/grub. Which is a good solution, but won t work: my best bet is that the kernel indeed keeps the resolution as told by grub, but the moment systemd loads the nvidia driver, it enables 4K in the display and the console gets the high resolution. Actually, for a few weeks, I blamed plymouth. Because the plymouth service is loaded early by systemd, it could be responsible for setting some of the display settings. It actually contains some (undocummented) DeviceScale configuration option that is seemingly aimed to integrate into high resolution scenarios. I played with it to no avail. Some folks from IRC suggested reconfiguring the console-font package. Back-then unknown to me. Running sudo dpkg-reconfigure console-font would indeed show a menu to select some preferences for the console, including font size. But apparently, a freshly installed system already uses the biggest possible, so this was a dead end. Other option I evaluted for a few days was touching the kernel framebuffer setting. I honestly don t understand this, and all the solutions pointing to use fbset didn t work for me anyways. This is the default framebuffer configuration in one of the laptops:
user@debian:~$ fbset -i

mode "3840x2160"
    geometry 3840 2160 3840 2160 32
    timings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    accel true
    rgba 8/16,8/8,8/0,0/0
endmode
Frame buffer device information:
    Name        : i915drmfb
    Address     : 0
    Size        : 33177600
    Type        : PACKED PIXELS
    Visual      : TRUECOLOR
    XPanStep    : 1
    YPanStep    : 1
    YWrapStep   : 0
    LineLength  : 15360
    Accelerator : No
Playing with these numbers, I was able to modify the geometry of the console, only to reduce the panel to a tiny square in the console display (with equally small fonts anyway). If it was possible to scale or resize the panel in other way, I was unable to understand how to do so by reading the associated docs. One day, out of despair, I tried disabling kernel modesetting (or KMS). It indeed got me a more readable tty1, only to prevent the whole graphic stack from starting, with Xorg complaining about the lack of kernel modeset. After lots of wasted time, I decided to blame the NVIDIA graphic card. Because why not: a closed source module in my system looks fishy. I registered in their official forum and wrote a message about my suspicion on the module, asking for advice on how to modify the driver default resolution. I was hoping that something like modprobe nvidia my_desired_resolution=1920x1080 could exist. Apparently not :-( I was about to give up. I had walked every corner of the known internet. I even tried summoning the ancient gods, I used ChatGPT. I asked the AI god for mercy, for a working solution to no avail. Then I decided to change the kind of queries I was issuing the search engines (don t ask me, I no longer remember). Eventually I landed in this askubuntu.com page. The question described the exact same problem I was experiencing. Finally, that was encouraging! I was not alone in my adventure after all! The solution section included a font size I hadn t seen before in my previous tests: 16x32. More excitement! I did all the steps. I installed the xfonts-terminus package, and in the file /etc/default/console-setup I put:
ACTIVE_CONSOLES="/dev/tty[1-6]"
CHARMAP="ISO-8859-15"
CODESET="guess"
FONTFACE="Terminus"
FONTSIZE="16x32"
VIDEOMODE=
Then I run setupcon from a tty, and the miracle happened! I finally got a bigger font in the tty1 console! Turned out a potential solution was about playing with console-setup, which I had tried wihtout success before. I m not even sure if the additional package was required. This is how my console looks now: Linux tty console with high resolution but not so tiny fonts The truth is the solution is satisfying only to a degree. I m a person with good eyesight and can work with these bit larger fonts. I m not sure if I can get larger fonts using this method, honestly. After some search, I discovered that some folks already managed to describe the problem in detail and filed a proper bug report in Debian, see #595696 opened more than 10 years ago. 2023 is the year of linux on the desktop Nope. I honestly don t see how this disconnected pile of settings can be all reconciled together. Can we please have a systemd-whatever that homogeinizes all of this mess? I m referring to grub + kernel drivers + console + lightdm + XFCE4. Next adventure When I lock the desktop (with CTRL+ALT+L) and close the laptop lid to suspend it, then reopen it, type the login info into the lightdm greeter, then the desktop environment never loads, black screen. I have already tried the first few search results without luck. Perhaps the nvidia card is to blame this time? Perhaps poorly coupled power management by the different system software pieces? Who knows what s going on here. This will probably be my next Debian desktop adventure.

Russell Coker: Links January 2023

The Intercept has an amusing and interesting article about senior Facebook employees testifying that they don t know where Facebook stores all it s data on users [1]. One lesson all programmers can learn from this is to document all these things in an orderly manner. Cory Doctorow wrote a short informative article about inflation from a modern monetary theory perspective [2]. Russ Allbery wrote an insightful blog post about effecive altruism and respect for disadvantaged people [3]. GiveDirectly sounds good. The Conversation has an interesting article about the Google and Apple app stores providing different versions of apps for users in different regions [4]. Apparently there are specific versions to comply with GDPR and versions that differ in adverts. The hope that GDPR would affect enough people to become essentially a world-wide standard was apparently overly optimistic. We need political lobbying in all countries for laws like the GDPR to force the app stores to give us the better versions of apps. Arya Voronova wrote an informative article about USB-C and extension or data blocker cables [5]. USB just keeps getting more horrible in technology while getting more useful in functionality. Laptops and phones catching fire will probably become more common in future. John McBride wrote an insightful article about the problems in the security of the software supply chain [6]. His main suggestion for addressing problems is If you are on a team that relies on some piece of open source software, allocate real engineering time to contributing , the problem with this is that real engineering time means real money and companies don t want to do that. Maybe having companies contribute moderate amounts of money to a foundation that hires people would be a viable option. Toms Guide has an interesting article describing problems with the Tesla [7]. It doesn t cover things like autopilot driving over children and bikers but instead covers issues of the user interface that make it less pleasant to drive and also remove concentration from the road. The BBC has an interesting article about the way mathematical skill is correlated with the way language is used to express numbers [8]. Every country with a lesser way of expressing numbers should switch to some variation of the East-Asian way. Science 2.0 has an interesting blog post about the JP Aerospace plans to use airships to get most of the way through the atmosphere and then a plane to get to orbit [9]. It s a wild idea but seems plausible. The idea of going to space in balloons seems considerably scarier to me than the current space craft. Interesting list of red team and physical entry gear with links to YouTube videos showing how to use them [10]. The Verge has an informative summary of the way Elon mismanaged Twitter after taking it over [11].

29 January 2023

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppTOML 0.2.2 on CRAN: Now with macOS-on-Intel Builds

Just days after a build-fix release (for aarch64) and still only a few weeks after the 0.2.0 release of RcppTOML and its switch to toml++, we have another bugfix release 0.2.2 on CRAN also bringing release 3.3.0 of toml++ (even if we had large chunks of 3.3.0 already incorporated). TOML is a file format that is most suitable for configurations, as it is meant to be edited by humans but read by computers. It emphasizes strong readability for humans while at the same time supporting strong typing as well as immediate and clear error reports. On small typos you get parse errors, rather than silently corrupted garbage. Much preferable to any and all of XML, JSON or YAML though sadly these may be too ubiquitous now. TOML is frequently being used with the projects such as the Hugo static blog compiler, or the Cargo system of Crates (aka packages ) for the Rust language. The package was building fine on Intel-based macOS provided the versions were recent enough. CRAN, however, aims for the broadest possibly reach of binaries and builds on a fairly ancient macOS 10.13 with clang version 10. This confused toml++ into (wrongly) concluding it could not build when it in fact can. After a hint from Simon that Apple in their infinite wisdom redefines clang version ids, this has been reflected in version 3.3.0 of toml++ by Mark so we should now build everywhere. Big thanks to everybody for the help. The short summary of changes follows.

Changes in version 0.2.2 (2023-01-29)
  • New toml++ version 3.3.0 with fix to permit compilation on ancient macOS systems as used by CRAN for the Intel-based builds.

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is a diffstat report for this release. More information is on the RcppTOML page page. Please use the GitHub issue tracker for issues and bugreports. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can sponsor me at GitHub.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

26 January 2023

Matt Brown: Goals for 2023

This is the second of a two-part post covering my goals for 2023. See the first part to understand the vision, mission and strategy driving these goals. I want to thank my friend Nat, and Will Larson whose annual reviews I ve always enjoyed reading for inspiring me to write these posts. I ve found the process articulating my motivations and goals very useful to clarify my thoughts and create tangible next steps. I m grateful for that in and of itself, but I also hope that by publishing this you too might find it interesting, and the additional public accountability it creates will be a positive encouragement to me.

2023 Goals My focus for 2023 is to bootstrap a business that I can use to build software that solves real problems (see the strategy from the previous post for more details on this). I m going to track this via three goals:
  1. Execute a series of successful consulting engagements, building a reputation for myself and leaving happy customers willing to provide testimonials that support a pipeline of future opportunities.
  2. Grow my product development skill set by taking several ideas to MVP stage with customer feedback received, and launch at least one product which generates revenue and has growth potential.
  3. Develop and maintain a broad professional network.

Consulting Based on my background and experience, I plan to target my consulting across three areas:
  1. Leadership - building and growing operationally focused software teams following SRE/devops principles. A typical engagement may involve helping a client establish a brand new SRE/devops practice, or to strengthen and mature the existing practices used to build and operate reliable software in their team(s).
  2. Architecture - applying deep technical expertise to the design of large software systems, particularly focusing on their reliability and operability. A typical engagement may involve design input and decision making support for key aspects of a new system, providing external review and analysis to improve an existing system, or delivering actionable, tactical next steps during or immediately after a reliability crisis.
  3. Technology Strategy - translating high-level business needs into a technical roadmap that provides understandable explanations of the value software can deliver in that context, and the iterative series of appropriately sized projects required to realise it. A typical customer for this would be a small to medium sized business outside of the software industry with a desire to use software in a transformative way to improve their business but who does not employ the necessary in-house expertise to lead that transition.

Product Development There are three, currently extremely high level, product ideas that I m excited to explore:
  1. Improve co-ordination of electricity resources to accelerate the electrification of NZ s energy demand and the transition to zero carbon grid. NZ has huge potential to be a world-leader in decarbonising energy use through electrification, but requires a massive transition to realise the benefits. Many of the challenges to that transition involve coordination of an order of magnitude more distributed energy resources (DER) in a much more dynamic and software-oriented manner than the electricity industry is traditionally experienced with. The concept of improving DER coordination is not novel, but our grid has unique characteristics that mean we re likely to need to build localised solutions. There is a strong match between my experience with large, high-reliability distributed software systems, and this need. With renewed motivation in the industry for rapid progress and many conversations and consultations still in their early stages this a very compelling space to explore with the intent of developing a more detailed product opportunity to pursue.
  2. Reduce agricultural emissions by making high performance farm management, including effortless compliance reporting, straightforward, fun and effective for busy farmers. NZ s commitments to reduce agricultural emissions (our largest single sector) place increased compliance and reporting burdens on busy farmers who don t want to report the same data multiple times to different regulators and authorities. In tandem, rising business costs and constraints drive a need for continuous improvements in efficiency, performance and farm management processes in order to remain profitable. This in turn drives increases in complexity and the volume of data that farmers must work with. Many industry organisations and associated software developers offer existing products aimed at addressing aspects of these problems, but anecdotal feedback indicates these are poorly integrated, piecemeal solutions that are often frustrating to use - a burden rather than a source of continuous improvement. It looks like there could be an opportunity for a delightful, comprehensive farm management and reporting system to disrupt the industry and help farmers run more profitable and sustainable farms while also reducing compliance costs and effort.
  3. Lower sickness rates and improve cognitive performance by enabling every indoor space to benefit from continuous ventilation monitoring and reporting. Indoor air quality is important in reducing disease transmission risk and promoting optimal cognitive performance, but despite the current pandemic temporarily raising its profile, a focus on indoor air quality generally remains under the radar for most people. One factor contributing to this is the lack of widely available systems for continuously monitoring and reporting on air quality. I built https://co2mon.nz/ to help address this problem in my children s school during 2022. I see potential to further grow this business through marketing and raising awareness of the value of ventilation monitoring in all indoor environments.
In addition to these mission aligned product ideas, I m also interested in exploring the creation of small to medium sized SaaS applications that deliver useful value by serving the needs of a specialised or niche business or industry. Even when not directly linked to the overall mission, the development and operation of products of this type can support the strategy. Each application adds direct revenue and also contributes to achieving better economies of scale in the many backend processes and infrastructure required to deliver secure, reliable and performant software systems.

Developing my professional network To help make this goal more actionable and measurable I will track 3 sub goals:
  1. To build a professional relationship with at least 30 new people this year, meaning that we ve met and had a decent conversation at least a couple of times and keep in touch at least every few months in some form.
  2. To publish a piece of writing on this site at least once a week, and for many of those to generate interesting conversations and feedback. I ll use this as an opportunity to explore product ideas, highlight my consulting expertise and generally contribute interesting technical content into the world.
  3. To support the growth of my local technical community by volunteering my experience and knowledge with others through activities such as mentoring, conference talks and similar.

Next Steps Over the coming weeks I ll write more about each of these topics - you can use the box in the sidebar (or on the front page, if you re on a phone) to be notified when I post new writing (there s also an RSS feed here, for the geeks). I d love to have your feedback and engagement on these goals too - please drop me an email with your thoughts or even book a meeting - it won t be a distraction to me, you ll be helping me meet my goal of developing and maintaining my network :)

Shirish Agarwal: Minidebconf Tamilnadu 2023, Tinnitus, Cooking, Books and Series.

First up is Minidebconf Tamilnadu 2023 that would be held on 28-29 January 2023. You can find rest of the details here. I do hope we get to see/hear some good stuff from the Minidebconf. Best of luck to all those who are applying.

Tinnitus During the lock-down of March 2020, I became aware of noise in ears and subsequently major hearing loss. It took me quite a while to know that Tinnitus happens to both those who have hearing loss as well as not. I keep running into threads like this and as shared by someone nobody knows what really causes it. I did try some of the apps (an app. called Resound on Android) that is supposed to tackle Tinnitus but it hasn t helped much. There is this but at least for me, right now pretty speculative. Also this, and again highly speculative.

Cooking After mum passed away, I haven t cooked anything. This used to give me pleasure but now just doesn t feel right. Cooking is something you enjoy when you are doing for somebody else and not just for yourself, at least that s how I feel and with that the curiosity to know more recipes. I do wanna buy a wok at sometime but when, how I just don t know.

Books Have been reading books quite a bit. And due to that had to again revisit and understand ISBN. Perhaps I might have shared it before. It really is something, the history of ISBN. And that co-relates with the book I read, Raising Steam by Terry Pratchett. Raising Steam is the 40th Book in the Discworld Series and it basically romanticizes and reminisces how the idea of an engine was born, and then a steam engine and how actually Railways started. There has been a lot of history and experiences from the early years of Steam Railway that have been taken and transplanted into the book. Also how Railways is and can be successful if only it is invested wisely and maintenance is done. This is only where imagination and reality come apart as maintenance isn t done and then you have issues. While this is and was in the UK, similar situation exists in India and many other places around the world and doesn t matter whether it is private or public. Exceptions are German, French but then that maybe due to Labor movements that happened and were successful unlike in other places. I could go on but then it will become a different article in itself. Suffice to say there is much to learn and you need serious people to look after it. Both in UK and India we lack that. And not just in Railways but Civil Aviation too, but again that is a story in itself.

Web-series Apart from books, have been seeing web-series that Willow is a good one that I enjoyed even though I hadn t seen the earlier movie. While there has been a flurry of movies and web-series both due to end of year and beginning of 2023 and yet have tried to be a bit partial on what I wanna watch or not. If it has crime, fantasy, drama then usually I like it. For e.g. I saw Blackout and pretty much was engrossed in what will happen next. It also does lead you to ask questions about centralization vs de-centralization for both power and other utilities and does make a case for communities to have their utilities apart from the grid as a fallback. How do we do over decades or centuries about it is a different question perhaps altogether. There were two books that kinda stood out for me, the first was Ian Rankin s Naming of the Dead . The book is about a cynical John Rebus, a man after my own heart. I am probably going to buy a few more of his series. In a way it also tells you why UK is the way it is right now. Another book that I liked was Shades of Grey by Jasper Fforde. This is one of the books that Mum would have clearly liked. It is pretty unusual while at the same time very close to 1984 and other such dystopian novels. The main trope of the book is what color you can see and how much you can see. The main character is somebody who can see Red, around the age of 20. One of the interesting aspects of the book is de-facting which closely resembles the Post-Truth world where alternative facts can be made out of air and they don t need any scientific evidence to back them up. In Jasper s world, they don t care about how things work and most of the technology is banned and curiosity is considered harmful and those who show that are murdered one way or the other. Interestingly, the author has just last year decided to start book 2 in the 3 book series that is supposed to be. This also tells why the U.S. is such a precarious situation in a way. A part of it is also due to the media which is in hands of chosen few, the same goes for UK and India, almost an oligopoly.

The Great Escape This is also a book but also about experiences of people, not in 19th-20th century but today that tells you slavery is alive and well and human-trafficking as well. This piece from NPR tells you about an MNC and Indian workers. What I found interesting is that there barely is an mention of the Indian Embassy that is supposed to help Indian people. I do know for a fact that the embassies of India has seen a drastic shortage of both people and materials even since the new Govt. came in place that was nine years ago. Incidentally, BBC shared about the Gujarat riots 2002 and that has been censored in India. They keep quiet about the UK Govt. who did find out that the Chief Minister was directly responsible for the killings and in facts his number 2, Amit Shah had shared that we would do 2002 again in the election cycle barely a month ago. But sadly, no hate speech FIR or any action was taken against Mr. Shah. There have been attempts by people to showcase the documentary. For e.g. JNU tried it and the rowdies from ABVP (arm of BJP) created violence. Even the questions that has been asked by the Wire, GOI will not acknowledge them. Interestingly, all India s edtechs have taken a beating in the last 6-8 months including the biggest BJYU s. Sharing a story from 2021 where things were best and today all of them are at bottom. In fact, the public has been wary as the prices of the courses has kept on increasing and most case studies have been found to be fake. Also the general outlook on jobs and growth has been pessimistic. In fact, most companies have been shedding jobs truckloads, most in the I.T. sector but other sectors as well. Hospitality and other related sectors have taken a huge beating, part of it post-pandemic, part of it Govt s refusal to either spend money or do any positive policies for either infrastructure, education, medical, you name it, they think private sector has all the answers which has been proven to be wrong again and again. I did not want to end on a discordant note but things are the way they are

B lint R czey: How to speed up your next build 5-20x with Firebuild?

Firebuild logo
TL;DR: Just prefix your build command (or any command) with firebuild:
firebuild <build command>
OK, but how does it work? Firebuild intercepts all processes started by the command to cache their outputs. Next time when the command or any of its descendant commands is executed with the same parameters, inputs and environment, the outputs are replayed (the command is shortcut) from the cache instead of running the command again. This is similar to how ccache and other compiler-specific caches work, but firebuild can shortcut any deterministic command, not only a specific list of compilers. Since the inputs of each command is determined at run time firebuild does not need a maintained complete dependency graph in the source like Bazel. It can work with any build system that does not implement its own caching mechanism. Determinism of commands is detected at run-time by preloading libfirebuild.so and interposing standard library calls and syscalls. If the command and all its descendants inputs are available when the command starts and all outputs can be calculated from the inputs then the command can be shortcut, otherwise it will be executed again. The interception comes with a 5-10% overhead, but rebuilds can be 5-20 times, or even faster depending on the changes between the builds. Can I try it? It is already available in Debian Unstable and Testing, Ubuntu s development release and the latest stable version is back-ported to supported Ubuntu releases via a PPA. How can I analyze my builds with firebuild? Firebuild can generate an HTML report showing each command s contribution to the build time. Below are the before and after reports of json4s, a Scala project. The command call graphs (lower ones) show that java (scalac) took 99% of the original build. Since the scalac invocations are shortcut (cutting the second build s time to less than 2% of the first one) they don t even show up in the accelerated second build s call graph. What s left to be executed again in the second run are env, perl, make and a few simple commands. The upper graphs are the process trees, with expandable nodes (in blue) also showing which command invocations were shortcut (green). Clicking on a node shows details of the command and the reason if it was not shortcut. Could I accelerate my project more? Firebuild works best for builds with CPU-intensive processes and comes with defaults to not cache very quick commands, such as sh, grep, sed, etc., because caching those would take cache space and shortcutting them may not speed up the build that much. They can still be shortcut with their parent command. Firebuild s strength is that it can find shortcutting points in the process tree automatically, e.g. from sh -c 'bash -c "sh -c echo Hello World!"' bash would be shortcut, but none of the sh commands would be cached. In typical builds there are many such commands from the skip_cache list. Caching those commands with firebuild -o 'processes.skip_cache = []' can improve acceleration and make the reports smaller. Firebuild also supports several debug flags and -d proc helps finding reasons for not shortcutting some commands:
...
FIREBUILD: Command "/usr/bin/make" can't be short-cut due to: Executable set to be not shortcut,  ExecedProcess 1329.2, running, "make -f debian/rules build", fds=[ FileFD fd=0  FileOFD ...
FIREBUILD: Command "/usr/bin/sort" can't be short-cut due to: Process read from inherited fd ,  ExecedProcess 4161.1, running, "sort", fds=[ FileFD fd=0  FileOFD ...
FIREBUILD: Command "/usr/bin/find" can't be short-cut due to: fstatfs() family operating on fds is not supported,  ExecedProcess 1360.1, running, "find -mindepth 1 ...
...
make, ninja and other incremental build tool binaries are not shortcut because they compare the timestamp of files, but they are fast at least and every build step they perform can still be shortcut. Ideally the slower build steps that could not be shortcut can be re-implemented in ways that can be shortcut by avoiding tools performing unsupported operations. I hope those tools help speeding up your build with very little effort, but if not and you find something to fix or improve in firebuild itself, please report it or just leave a feedback! Happy speeding, but not on public roads!

24 January 2023

Kentaro Hayashi: Porterboxes and alternatives

As you know, Debian projects and sponsor provides so-called "porterbox", but it does not cover all architectures. There are some alternatives to fix architecture-specific bugs. For the record, let's pick it up them. [1][2][3]
porterbox deb-o-matic qemu
amd64 adayevskaya.d.o debomatic-amd64.d.n DQIB ready
arm64 amdahl.d.o debomatic-arm64.d.n DQIB ready
armel amdahl.d.o abel.d.o debomatic-armel.d.n NG
armhf amdahl.d.o abel.d.o harris.d.o debomatic-armhf.d.n DQIB ready
i386 exodar.d.n debomatic-i386.d.n DQIB ready
mips64el eller.d.o debomatic-mips64el.d.n DQIB ready
mipsel eller.d.o debomatic-mipsel.d.n DQIB ready
ppc64el platti.d.o debomatic-ppc64el.d.n DQIB ready
s390x zelenka.d.o debomatic-s390x.d.n DQIB ready
alpha N/A N/A NG
arc N/A N/A N/A
hppa panama.d.n N/A N/A
ia64 yttrium.d.n N/A N/A
kfreebsd-amd64 lemon.d.n N/A N/A
kfreebsd-i386 lemon.d.n N/A N/A
m68k mitchy.d.n N/A NG
powerpc perotto.d.n debomatic-powerpc.d.n DQIB ready
ppc64 perotto.d.n N/A DQIB ready
riscv64 debian-riscv64-porterbox-01.d.n N/A DQIB ready
sh4 N/A N/A NG
sparc64 kyoto.d.n N/A N/A
x32 N/A N/A N/A
Thus, no alternatives for alpha, arc, sh4 and x32.

22 January 2023

Dirk Eddelbuettel: Rcpp 1.0.10 on CRAN: Regular Update

rcpp logo The Rcpp team is thrilled to announce the newest release 1.0.10 of the Rcpp package which is hitting CRAN now and will go to Debian shortly. Windows and macOS builds should appear at CRAN in the next few days, as will builds in different Linux distribution and of course at r2u. The release was prepared a few days ago, but given the widespread use at CRAN it took a few days to be processed. As always, our sincere thanks to the CRAN maintainers Uwe Ligges and Kurt Hornik. This release continues with the six-months cycle started with release 1.0.5 in July 2020. As a reminder, we do of course make interim snapshot dev or rc releases available via the Rcpp drat repo and strongly encourage their use and testing I run my systems with these versions which tend to work just as well, and are also fully tested against all reverse-dependencies. Rcpp has become the most popular way of enhancing R with C or C++ code. Right now, around 2623 packages on CRAN depend on Rcpp for making analytical code go faster and further, along with 252 in BioConductor. On CRAN, 13.7% of all packages depend (directly) on CRAN, and 58.7% of all compiled packages do. From the cloud mirror of CRAN (which is but a subset of all CRAN downloads), Rcpp has been downloaded 67.1 million times. This release is incremental as usual, preserving existing capabilities faithfully while smoothing our corners and / or extending slightly. Of particular note is the now fully-enabled use of the unwind protection making some operations a little faster by default; special thanks to I aki for spearheading this. Kevin and I also polished a few other bugs off as detailed below. The full list of details follows.

Changes in Rcpp release version 1.0.10 (2023-01-12)
  • Changes in Rcpp API:
    • Unwind protection is enabled by default (I aki in #1225). It can be disabled by defining RCPP_NO_UNWIND_PROTECT before including Rcpp.h. RCPP_USE_UNWIND_PROTECT is not checked anymore and has no effect. The associated plugin unwindProtect is therefore deprecated and will be removed in a future release.
    • The 'finalize' method for Rcpp Modules is now eagerly materialized, fixing an issue where errors can occur when Module finalizers are run (Kevin in #1231 closing #1230).
    • Zero-row data.frame objects can receive push_back or push_front (Dirk in #1233 fixing #1232).
    • One remaining sprintf has been replaced by snprintf (Dirk and Kevin in #1236 and #1237).
    • Several conversion warnings found by clang++ have been addressed (Dirk in #1240 and #1241).
  • Changes in Rcpp Attributes:
    • The C++20, C++2b (experimental) and C++23 standards now have plugin support like the other C++ standards (Dirk in #1228).
    • The source path for attributes received one more protection from spaces (Dirk in #1235 addressing #1234).
  • Changes in Rcpp Deployment:
    • Several GitHub Actions have been updated.

Thanks to my CRANberries, you can also look at a diff to the previous release. Questions, comments etc should go to the rcpp-devel mailing list off the R-Forge page. Bugs reports are welcome at the GitHub issue tracker as well (where one can also search among open or closed issues); questions are also welcome under rcpp tag at StackOverflow which also allows searching among the (currently) 2932 previous questions. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can sponsor me at GitHub.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

Dirk Eddelbuettel: BH 1.81.0-1 oon CRAN: New Upstream, New Library, sprintf Change

Boost Boost is a very large and comprehensive set of (peer-reviewed) libraries for the C++ programming language, containing well over one hundred individual libraries. The BH package provides a sizeable subset of header-only libraries for (easier, no linking required) use by R. It is fairly widely used: the (partial) CRAN mirror logs (aggregated from the cloud mirrors) show over 32.6 million package downloads. Version 1.81.0 of Boost was released in December following the regular Boost release schedule of April, August and December releases. As the commits and changelog show, we packaged it almost immediately and started testing following our annual update cycle which strives to balance being close enough to upstream and not stressing CRAN and the user base too much. The reverse depends check revealed about a handful of packages requiring changes or adjustments which is a pretty good outcome given the over three hundred direct reverse dependencies. So we opened issue #88 to coordinate the issue over the winter break during which CRAN also closes (just as we did before), and also send a wider PSA tweet as a heads-up. Our sincere thanks to the two packages that already updated, and the four that likely will soon. Our thanks also to CRAN for reviewing the package impact over the last few days since I uploaded the package earlier this week. There are a number of changes I have to make each time in BH, and it is worth mentioning them. Because CRAN cares about backwards compatibility and the ability to be used on minimal or older systems, we still adjust the filenames of a few files to fit a jurassic constraints of just over a 100 characters per filepath present in some long-outdated versions of tar. Not a big deal. We also, and that is more controversial, silence a number of #pragma diagnostic messages for g++ and clang++ because CRAN insists on it. I have no choice in that matter. Next, and hopefully this time only, we also found and replaced a few remaining sprintf uses and replaced them with snprintf. Many of the Boost libraries did that, so I hope by the next upgrade for Boost 1.84.0 next winter this will be fully taken care of. Lastly, and also only this time, we silenced a warning about Boost switching to C++14 in the next release 1.82.0 in April. This may matter for a number of packages having a hard-wired selection of C++11 as their C++ language standard. Luckily our compilers are good enough for C++14 so worst case I will have to nudge a few packages next December. This release adds one new library for url processing which struck us as potentially quite useful. The more detailed NEWS log follows.

Changes in version 1.81.0-1 (2023-01-17)
  • Upgrade to Boost 1.81.0 (#87)
  • Added url (new in 1.81.0)
  • Converted remaining sprintf to snprintf (#90 fixing #89)
  • Comment-out gcc warning messages in three files

Via my CRANberries, there is a diffstat report relative to the previous release. Comments and suggestions about BH are welcome via the issue tracker at the GitHub repo. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

21 January 2023

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppSimdJson 0.1.9 on CRAN: New Upstream

The RcppSimdJson package was just updated to release 0.1.9. RcppSimdJson wraps the fantastic and genuinely impressive simdjson library by Daniel Lemire and collaborators. Via very clever algorithmic engineering to obtain largely branch-free code, coupled with modern C++ and newer compiler instructions, it results in parsing gigabytes of JSON parsed per second which is quite mindboggling. The best-case performance is faster than CPU speed as use of parallel SIMD instructions and careful branch avoidance can lead to less than one cpu cycle per byte parsed; see the video of the talk by Daniel Lemire at QCon. This release updates the underlying simdjson library to version 3.0.1, settles on C++17 as the language standard, exports a worker function for direct C(++) access, and polishes a few small things around the package and tests. The NEWS entry for this release follows.

Changes in version 0.1.9 (2023-01-21)
  • The internal function deseralize_json is now exported at the C++ level as well as in R (Dirk in #81 closing #80).
  • simdjson was upgraded to version 3.0.1 (Dirk in #83).
  • The package now defaults to C++17 compilation; configure has been retired (Dirk closing #82).
  • The three main R access functions now use a more compact argument check via stopifnot (Dirk).

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is also a diffstat report for this release. For questions, suggestions, or issues please use the issue tracker at the GitHub repo. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppFastFloat 0.0.4 on CRAN: New Upstream

A new release of RcppFastFloat arrived on CRAN yesterday. The package wraps fast_float, another nice library by Daniel Lemire. For details, see the arXiv paper showing that one can convert character representations of numbers into floating point at rates at or exceeding one gigabyte per second. This release updates the underlying fast_float library version. Special thanks to Daniel Lemire for quickly accomodating a parsing use case we had encode as a test, namely with various whitespace codes. The default in fast_float, as in C++17, is to be more narrow but we enable the wider use case via two #define statements.

Changes in version 0.0.4 (2023-01-20)
  • Update to fast_float 3.9.0
  • Set two #define re-establish prior behaviour with respect to whitespace removal prior to parsing for as.double2()
  • Small update to continuous integration actions

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is also a diffstat report for this release. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

19 January 2023

Antoine Beaupr : Mastodon comments in ikiwiki

Today I noticed bounces in my mail box. They were from ikiwiki trying to send registration confirmation email to users who probably never asked for it. I'm getting truly fed up with spam in my wiki. At this point, all comments are manually approved and I still get trouble: now it's scammers spamming the registration form with dummy accounts, which bounce back to me when I make new posts, or just generate backscatter spam for the confirmation email. It's really bad. I have hundreds of users registered on my blog, and I don't know which are spammy, which aren't. So. I'm considering ditching ikiwiki comments altogether. I am testing Mastodon as a commenting platforms. Others (e.g. JAK) have implemented this as a server but a simpler approach is toload them dynamically from Mastodon, which is what Carl Shwan has done. They are using Hugo, however, so they can easily embed page metadata in the template to load the right server with the right comment ID. I wasn't sure how to do this in ikiwiki: it's typically hard to access page-specific metadata in templates. Even the page name is not there, for example. I have tried using templates, and that (obviously?) fails because the <script> stuff gets sanitized away. It seems I would need to split the JavaScript out of the template into a base template and then make the page template refer to a function in there. It's kind of horrible and messy. I wish there was a way to just access page metadata from the page template itself... I found out the meta plugin passes along its metadata, but that's not (easily) extensible. So i'd need to either patch that module, and my history of merged patches is not great so far. So: another plugin. I have something that kind of works that's a combination of a page.tmpl patch and a plugin. The plugin adds a mastodon directive that feeds the page.tmpl with the right stuff. On clicking a button, it injects comments from the Mastodon API, with a JavaScript callback. It's not pretty (it's not themed at all!), but it works. If you want to do this at home, you need this page.tmpl (or at least this patch and that one) and the mastodon.pm plugin from my mastodon-plugin branch. I'm not sure this is a good idea. The first test I did was a "test comment" which led to half a dozen "test reply". I then realized I couldn't redact individual posts from there. I don't even know if, when I mute a user, it actually gets hidden from everyone else too... So I'll test this for a while, I guess. I have also turned off all CGI on this site. It will keep users from registering while I cleanup this mess and think about next steps. I have other options as well if push comes to shove, but I'm unlikely to go back to ikiwiki comments. Mastodon comments are nice because they don't require me to run any extra software: either I have my own federated service I reuse, or I use someone else's, but I don't need to run something extra. And, of course, comments are published in a standard way that's interoperable with everything... On the other hand, now I won't have comments enabled until the blog is posted on Mastodon... Right now this happens only when feed2exec runs and the HTTP cache expires, which can take up to a day. I should probably do this some other way, like flush the cache when a new post arrives, or run post-commit hooks, but for now, this will have to do. Update: I figured out a way to make this work in a timely manner:
  1. there's a post-merge hook in my ikiwiki git repository which calls feed2exec in /home/w-anarcat/source/.git/hooks/ took me a while to find it! I tried post-update and post-receive first, but ikiwiki actually pulls from the bare directory in the source directory, so only post-merge fires (even though it's not a merge)
  2. feed2exec then finds new blog posts (if any!) and fires up the new ikiwikitoot plugin which then...
  3. posts the toot using the toot command (it just works, why reinvent the wheel), keeping the toot URL
  4. finds the Markdown source file associated with the post, and adds the magic mastodon directive
  5. commits and pushes the result
This will make the interaction with Mastodon much smoother: as soon as a blog post is out of "draft" (i.e. when it hits the RSS feeds), this will immediately trigger and post the blog entry to Mastodon, enabling comments. It's kind of a tangled mess of stuff, but it works! I have briefly considered not using feed2exec for this, but it turns out it does an important job of parsing the result of ikiwiki's rendering. Otherwise I would have to guess which post is really a blog post, is this just an update or is it new, is it a draft, and so on... all sorts of questions where the business logic already resides in ikiwiki, and that I would need to reimplement myself. Plus it goes alongside moving more stuff (like my feed reader) to dedicated UNIX accounts (in this case, the blog sandbox) for security reasons. Whee!

18 January 2023

Russ Allbery: Review: Forward

Review: Forward, edited by Blake Crouch
Publisher: Amazon Original Stories
Copyright: September 2019
ISBN: 1-5420-9206-X
ISBN: 1-5420-4363-8
ISBN: 1-5420-9357-0
ISBN: 1-5420-0434-9
ISBN: 1-5420-4363-8
ISBN: 1-5420-4425-1
Format: Kindle
Pages: 300
This is another Amazon collection of short fiction, this time mostly at novelette length. (The longer ones might creep into novella.) As before, each one is available separately for purchase or Amazon Prime "borrowing," with separate ISBNs. The sidebar cover is for the first in the sequence. (At some point I need to update my page templates so that I can add multiple covers.) N.K. Jemisin's "Emergency Skin" won the 2020 Hugo Award for Best Novelette, so I wanted to read and review it, but it would be too short for a standalone review. I therefore decided to read the whole collection and review it as an anthology. This was a mistake. Learn from my mistake. The overall theme of the collection is technological advance, rapid change, and the ethical and social question of whether we should slow technology because of social risk. Some of the stories stick to that theme more closely than others. Jemisin's story mostly ignores it, which was probably the right decision. "Ark" by Veronica Roth: A planet-killing asteroid has been on its inexorable way towards Earth for decades. Most of the planet has been evacuated. A small group has stayed behind, cataloging samples and filling two remaining ships with as much biodiversity as they can find with the intent to leave at the last minute. Against that backdrop, two of that team bond over orchids. If you were going "wait, what?" about the successful evacuation of Earth, yeah, me too. No hint is offered as to how this was accomplished. Also, the entirety of humanity abandoned mutual hostility and national borders to cooperate in the face of the incoming disaster, which is, uh, bizarrely optimistic for an otherwise gloomy story. I should be careful about how negative I am about this story because I am sure it will be someone's favorite. I can even write part of the positive review: an elegiac look at loss, choices, and the meaning of a life, a moving look at how people cope with despair. The writing is fine, the story structure works; it's not a bad story. I just found it monumentally depressing, and was not engrossed by the emotionally abused protagonist's unresolved father issues. I can imagine a story around the same facts and plot that I would have liked much better, but all of these people need therapy and better coping mechanisms. I'm also not sure what this had to do with the theme, given that the incoming asteroid is random chance and has nothing to do with technological development. (4) "Summer Frost" by Blake Crouch: The best part of this story is the introductory sequence before the reader knows what's going on, which is full of evocative descriptions. I'm about to spoil what is going on, so if you want to enjoy that untainted by the stupidity of the rest of the plot, skip the rest of this story review. We're going to have a glut of stories about the weird and obsessive form of AI risk invented by the fevered imaginations of the "rationalist" community, aren't we. I don't know why I didn't predict that. It's going to be just as annoying as the glut of cyberpunk novels written by people who don't understand computers. Crouch lost me as soon as the setup is revealed. Even if I believed that a game company would use a deep learning AI still in learning mode to run an NPC (I don't; see Microsoft's Tay for an obvious reason why not), or that such an NPC would spontaneously start testing the boundaries of the game world (this is not how deep learning works), Crouch asks the reader to believe that this AI started as a fully scripted NPC in the prologue with a fixed storyline. In other words, the foundation of the story is that this game company used an AI model capable of becoming a general intelligence for barely more than a cut scene. This is not how anything works. The rest of the story is yet another variation on a science fiction plot so old and threadbare that Isaac Asimov invented the Three Laws of Robotics to avoid telling more versions of it. Crouch's contribution is to dress it up in the terminology of the excessively online. (The middle of the story features a detailed discussion of Roko's basilisk; if you recognize that, you know what you're in for.) Asimov would not have had a lesbian protagonist, so points for progress I guess, but the AI becomes more interesting to the protagonist than her wife and kid because of course it does. There are a few twists and turns along the way, but the destination is the bog-standard hard-takeoff general intelligence scenario. One more pet peeve: Authors, stop trying to illustrate the growth of your AI by having it move from broken to fluent English. English grammar is so much easier than self-awareness or the Turing test that we had programs that could critique your grammar decades before we had believable chatbots. It's going to get grammar right long before the content of the words makes any sense. Also, your AI doesn't sound dumber, your AI sounds like someone whose native language doesn't use pronouns and helper verbs the way that English does, and your decision to use that as a marker for intelligence is, uh, maybe something you should think about. (3) "Emergency Skin" by N.K. Jemisin: The protagonist is a heavily-augmented cyborg from a colony of Earth's diaspora. The founders of that colony fled Earth when it became obvious to them that the planet was dying. They have survived in another star system, but they need a specific piece of technology from the dead remnants of Earth. The protagonist has been sent to retrieve it. The twist is that this story is told in the second-person perspective by the protagonist's ride-along AI, created from a consensus model of the rulers of the colony. We never see directly what the protagonist is doing or thinking, only the AI reaction to it. This is exactly the sort of gimmick that works much better in short fiction than at novel length. Jemisin uses it to create tension between the reader and the narrator, and I thoroughly enjoyed the effect. (As shown in the Broken Earth trilogy, Jemisin is one of the few writers who can use second-person effectively.) I won't spoil the revelation, but it's barbed and biting and vicious and I loved it. Jemisin does deliver the point with a sledgehammer, so be aware of that if you want subtlety in your short fiction, but I prefer the bluntness. (This is part of why I usually don't get along with literary short stories.) The reader of course can't change the direction of the story, but the second-person perspective still provides a hit of vicarious satisfaction. I can see why this won the Hugo; it's worth seeking out. (8) "You Have Arrived at Your Destination" by Amor Towles: Sam and his wife are having a child, and they've decided to provide him with an early boost in life. Vitek is a fertility lab, but more than that, it can do some gene tweaking and adjustment to push a child more towards one personality or another. Sam and his wife have spent hours filling out profiles, and his wife spent hours weeding possible choices down to three. Now, Sam has come to Vitek to pick from the remaining options. Speaking of literary short stories, Towles is the non-SFF writer of this bunch, and it's immediately obvious. The story requires the SFnal premise, but after that this is a character piece. Vitek is an elite, expensive company with a condescending and overly-reductive attitude towards humanity, which is entirely intentional on the author's part. This is the sort of story that gets resolved in an unexpected conversation in a roadside bar, and where most of the conflict happens inside the protagonist's head. I was initially going to complain that Towles does the standard literary thing of leaving off the denouement on the grounds that the reader can figure it out, but when I did a bit of re-reading for this review, I found more of the bones than I had noticed the first time. There's enough subtlety that I had to think for a bit and re-read a passage, but not too much. It's also the most thoughtful treatment of the theme of the collection, the only one that I thought truly wrestled with the weird interactions between technological capability and human foresight. Next to "Emergency Skin," this was the best story of the collection. (7) "The Last Conversation" by Paul Tremblay: A man wakes up in a dark room, in considerable pain, not remembering anything about his life. His only contact with the world at first is a voice: a woman who is helping him recover his strength and his memory. The numbers that head the chapters have significant gaps, representing days left out of the story, as he pieces together what has happened alongside the reader. Tremblay is the horror writer of the collection, so predictably this is the story whose craft I can admire without really liking it. In this case, the horror comes mostly from the pacing of revelation, created by the choice of point of view. (This would be a much different story from the perspective of the woman.) It's well-done, but it has the tendency I've noticed in other horror stories of being a tightly closed system. I see where the connection to the theme is, but it's entirely in the setting, not in the shape of the story. Not my thing, but I can see why it might be someone else's. (5) "Randomize" by Andy Weir: Gah, this was so bad. First, and somewhat expectedly, it's a clunky throwback to a 1950s-style hard SF puzzle story. The writing is atrocious: wooden, awkward, cliched, and full of gratuitous infodumping. The characterization is almost entirely through broad stereotypes; the lone exception is the female character, who at least adds an interesting twist despite being forced to act like an idiot because of the plot. It's a very old-school type of single-twist story, but the ending is completely implausible and falls apart if you breathe on it too hard. Weir is something of a throwback to an earlier era of scientific puzzle stories, though, so maybe one is inclined to give him a break on the writing quality. (I am not; one of the ways in which science fiction has improved is that you can get good scientific puzzles and good writing these days.) But the science is also so bad that I was literally facepalming while reading it. The premise of this story is that quantum computers are commercially available. That will cause a serious problem for Las Vegas casinos, because the generator for keno numbers is vulnerable to quantum algorithms. The solution proposed by the IT person for the casino? A quantum random number generator. (The words "fight quantum with quantum" appear literally in the text if you're wondering how bad the writing is.) You could convince me that an ancient keno system is using a pseudorandom number generator that might be vulnerable to some quantum algorithm and doesn't get reseeded often enough. Fine. And yes, quantum computers can be used to generate high-quality sources of random numbers. But this solution to the problem makes no sense whatsoever. It's like swatting a house fly with a nuclear weapon. Weir says explicitly in the story that all the keno system needs is an external source of high-quality random numbers. The next step is to go to Amazon and buy a hardware random number generator. If you want to splurge, it might cost you $250. Problem solved. Yes, hardware random number generators have various limitations that may cause you problems if you need millions of bits or you need them very quickly, but not for something as dead-simple and with such low entropy requirements as keno numbers! You need a trivial number of bits for each round; even the slowest and most conservative hardware random number generator would be fine. Hell, measure the noise levels on the casino floor. Point a camera at a lava lamp. Or just buy one of the physical ball machines they use for the lottery. This problem is heavily researched, by casinos in particular, and is not significantly changed by the availability of quantum computers, at least for applications such as keno where the generator can be reseeded before each generation. You could maybe argue that this is an excuse for the IT guy to get his hands on a quantum computer, which fits the stereotypes, but that still breaks the story for reasons that would be spoilers. As soon as any other casino thought about this, they'd laugh in the face of the characters. I don't want to make too much of this, since anyone can write one bad story, but this story was dire at every level. I still owe Weir a proper chance at novel length, but I can't say this added to my enthusiasm. (2) Rating: 4 out of 10

Arnaud Rebillout: Build container images in GitLab CI (iptables-legacy at the rescue)

It's 2023 and these days, building a container image in a CI pipeline should be straightforward. So let's try. For this blog post we'll focus on GitLab SaaS only, that is, gitlab.com, as it's what I use for work and for personal projects. To get started, we just need two files in our Git repository: Here is our Git tree:
$ ls -A
Containerfile  .git  .gitlab-ci.yml
$ cat Containerfile 
FROM debian:stable
RUN  apt-get update
CMD  echo hello world
$ cat .gitlab-ci.yml 
build-container-image:
  stage: build
  image: debian:testing
  before_script:
    - apt-get update
    - apt-get install -y buildah ca-certificates
  script:
    - buildah build -t $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE .
    - buildah login -u $CI_REGISTRY_USER -p $CI_JOB_TOKEN $CI_REGISTRY
    - buildah push $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE
A few remarks: Now let's push that. Does the CI pass? No, of course, otherwise I wouldn't be writing this blog post ;) The CI fails at the buildah build command, with a rather cryptic error:
$ buildah build --tag $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE .
[...]
STEP 2/3: RUN  apt-get update
error running container: did not get container start message from parent: EOF
Error: building at STEP "RUN apt-get update": netavark: code: 4, msg: iptables v1.8.8 (nf_tables): Could not fetch rule set generation id: Invalid argument
The hint here is nf_tables... Back in July 2021, GitLab did a major update of their shared runners infrastructure, and broke nftables support in the process, as it seems. So we have to use iptables instead. Let's fix our .gitlab-ci.yml, which now looks like that:
$ cat .gitlab-ci.yml 
build-container-image:
  stage: build
  image: debian:testing
  before_script:
    - apt-get update
    - apt-get install -y buildah ca-certificates
    -  
      # Switch to iptables legacy, as GitLab CI doesn't support nftables.
      apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends iptables
      update-alternatives --set iptables /usr/sbin/iptables-legacy
  script:
    - buildah build -t $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE .
    - buildah login -u $CI_REGISTRY_USER -p $CI_JOB_TOKEN $CI_REGISTRY
    - buildah push $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE
And push again. Does that work? Yes! If you're interested in this issue, feel free to fork https://gitlab.com/arnaudr/gitlab-build-container-image and try it by yourself. It's been more than a year since this change, and I'm surprised that I didn't find much about it on the Internet, neither mentions of the issue, nor of a workaround. Maybe nobody builds container images in GitLab CI, or maybe they do it another way, I don't know. In any case, now it's documented in this blog, hopefully some will find it useful. Happy 2023!

16 January 2023

Russ Allbery: Review: The Truth

Review: The Truth, by Terry Pratchett
Series: Discworld #25
Publisher: Harper
Copyright: November 2000
Printing: August 2014
ISBN: 0-06-230736-3
Format: Mass market
Pages: 435
The Truth is the 25th Discworld novel. Some reading order guides group it loosely into an "industrial revolution" sequence following Moving Pictures, but while there are thematic similarities I'll talk about in a moment, there's no real plot continuity. You could arguably start reading Discworld here, although you'd be spoiled for some character developments in the early Watch novels. William de Worde is paid to write a newsletter. That's not precisely what he calls it, and it's not clear whether his patrons know that he publishes it that way. He's paid to report on news of Ankh-Morpork that may be of interest of various rich or influential people who are not in Ankh-Morpork, and he discovered the best way to optimize this was to write a template of the newsletter, bring it to an engraver to make a plate of it, and run off copies for each of his customers, with some minor hand-written customization. It's a comfortable living for the estranged younger son of a wealthy noble. As the story opens, William is dutifully recording the rumor that dwarfs have discovered how to turn lead into gold. The rumor is true, although not in the way that one might initially assume.
The world is made up of four elements: Earth, Air, Fire, and Water. This is a fact well known even to Corporal Nobbs. It's also wrong. There's a fifth element, and generally it's called Surprise. For example, the dwarfs found out how to turn lead into gold by doing it the hard way. The difference between that and the easy way is that the hard way works.
The dwarfs used the lead to make a movable type printing press, which is about to turn William de Worde's small-scale, hand-crafted newsletter into a newspaper. The movable type printing press is not unknown technology. It's banned technology, because the powers that be in Ankh-Morpork know enough to be deeply suspicious of it. The religious establishment doesn't like it because words are too important and powerful to automate. The nobles and the Watch don't like it because cheap words cause problems. And the engraver's guild doesn't like it for obvious reasons. However, Lord Vetinari knows that one cannot apply brakes to a volcano, and commerce with the dwarfs is very important to the city. The dwarfs can continue. At least for now. As in Moving Pictures, most of The Truth is an idiosyncratic speedrun of the social effects of a new technology, this time newspapers. William has no grand plan; he's just an observant man who likes to write, cares a lot about the truth, and accidentally stumbles into editing a newspaper. (This, plus being an estranged son of a rich family, feels very on-point for journalism.) His naive belief is that people want to read true things, since that's what his original patrons wanted. Truth, however, may not be in the top five things people want from a newspaper. This setup requires some narrative force to push it along, which is provided by a plot to depose Vetinari by framing him for murder. The most interesting part of that story is Mr. Pin and Mr. Tulip, the people hired to do the framing and then dispose of the evidence. They're a classic villain type: the brains and the brawn, dangerous, terrifying, and willing to do horrible things to people. But one thing Pratchett excels at is taking a standard character type, turning it a bit sideways, and stuffing in things that one wouldn't think would belong. In this case, that's Mr. Tulip's deep appreciation for, and genius grasp of, fine art. It should not work to have the looming, awful person with anger issues be able to identify the exact heritage of every sculpture and fine piece of goldsmithing, and yet somehow it does. Also as in Moving Pictures (and, in a different way, Soul Music), Pratchett tends to anthropomorphize technology, giving it a life and motivations of its own. In this case, that's William's growing perception of the press as an insatiable maw into which one has to feed words. I'm usually dubious of shifting agency from humans to things when doing social analysis (and there's a lot of social analysis here), but I have to concede that Pratchett captures something deeply true about the experience of feedback loops with an audience. A lot of what Pratchett puts into this book about the problematic relationship between a popular press and the truth is obvious and familiar, but he also makes some subtle points about the way the medium shapes what people expect from it and how people produce content for it that are worthy of Marshall McLuhan. The interactions between William and the Watch were less satisfying. In our world, the US press is, with only rare exceptions, a thoughtless PR organ for police propaganda and the exonerative tense. Pratchett tackles that here... sort of. William vaguely grasps that his job as a reporter may be contrary to the job of the Watch to maintain order, and Vimes's ambivalent feelings towards "solving crimes" push the story in that direction. But this is also Vimes, who is clearly established as one of the good sort and therefore is a bad vehicle for talking about how the police corrupt the press. Pratchett has Vimes and Vetinari tacitly encourage William, which works within the story but takes the pressure off the conflict and leaves William well short of understanding the underlying politics. There's a lot more that could be said about the tension between the press and the authorities, but I think the Discworld setup isn't suitable for it. This is the sort of book that benefits from twenty-four volumes of backstory and practice. Pratchett's Ankh-Morpork cast ticks along like a well-oiled machine, which frees up space that would otherwise have to be spent on establishing secondary characters. The result is a lot of plot and social analysis shoved into a standard-length Discworld novel, and a story that's hard to put down. The balance between humor and plot is just about perfect, the references and allusions aren't overwhelming, and the supporting characters, both new and old, are excellent. We even get a good Death sequence. This is solid, consistent stuff: Discworld as a mature, well-developed setting with plenty of stories left to tell. Followed by Thief of Time in publication order, and later by Monstrous Regiment in the vaguely-connected industrial revolution sequence. Rating: 8 out of 10

Next.

Previous.