Search Results: "cas"

10 November 2022

Melissa Wen: V3D enablement in mainline kernel

Hey, If you enjoy using upstream Linux kernel in your Raspberry Pi system or just want to give a try in the freshest kernel graphics drivers there, the good news is that now you can compile and boot the V3D driver from the mainline in your Raspberry Pi 4. Thanks to the work of Stefan, Peter and Nicolas [1] [2], the V3D enablement reached the Linux kernel mainline. That means hacking and using new features available in the upstream V3D driver directly from the source. However, even for those used to compiling and installing a custom kernel in the Raspberry Pi, there are some quirks to getting the mainline v3d module available in 32-bit and 64-bit systems. I ve quickly summarized how to compile and install upstream kernel versions (>=6.0) in this short blog post.
Note: V3D driver is not present in Raspberry Pi models 0-3.
First, I m taking into account that you already know how to cross-compile a custom kernel to your system. If it is not your case, a good tutorial is already available in the Raspberry Pi documentation, but it targets the kernel in the rpi-linux repository (downstream kernel). From this documentation, the main differences in the upstream kernel are presented below:

Raspberry Pi 4 64-bit (arm64)

Diff short summary:
  1. instead of getting the .config file from bcm2711_defconfig, get it by running make ARCH=arm64 defconfig
  2. compile and install the kernel image and modules as usual, but just copy the dtb file arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb to the /boot of your target machine (no /overlays directory to copy)
  3. change /boot/config.txt:
    • comment/remove the dt_overlay=vc4-kms-v3d entry
    • add a device_tree=bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb entry

Raspberry Pi 4 32-bits (arm)

Diff short summary:
  1. get the .config file by running make ARCH=arm multi_v7_defconfig
  2. using make ARCH=arm menuconfig or a similar tool, enable CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y
  3. compile and install the kernel image and modules as usual, but just copy the dtb file arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb to the /boot of your target machine (no /overlays directory to copy)
  4. change /boot/config.txt:
    • comment/remove the dt_overlay=vc4-kms-v3d entry
    • add a device_tree=bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb entry

Step-by-step for remote deployment:

Set variables Raspberry Pi 4 64-bit (arm64)
cd <path-to-upstream-linux-directory>
KERNEL= make kernelrelease 
ARCH="arm64"
CROSS_COMPILE="aarch64-linux-gnu-"
DEFCONFIG=defconfig
IMAGE=Image
DTB_PATH="broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb"
RPI4=<ip>
TMP= mktemp -d 
Raspberry Pi 4 32-bits (arm)
cd <path-to-upstream-linux-directory>
KERNEL= make kernelrelease 
ARCH="arm"
CROSS_COMPILE="arm-linux-gnueabihf-"
DEFCONFIG=multi_v7_defconfig
IMAGE=zImage
DTB_PATH="bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb"
RPI4=<ip>
TMP= mktemp -d 

Get default .config file
make ARCH=$ARCH CROSS_COMPILE=$CROSS_COMPILE $DEFCONFIG
Raspberry Pi 4 32-bit (arm) Additional step for 32-bit system. Enable CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y using make ARCH=arm menuconfig

Cross-compile the mainline kernel
make ARCH=$ARCH CROSS_COMPILE=$CROSS_COMPILE $IMAGE modules dtbs

Install modules to send
make ARCH=$ARCH CROSS_COMPILE=$CROSS_COMPILE INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$TMP modules_install

Copy kernel image, modules and the dtb to your remote system
ssh $RPI4 mkdir -p /tmp/new_modules /tmp/new_kernel
rsync -av $TMP/ $RPI4:/tmp/new_modules/
scp arch/$ARCH/boot/$IMAGE $RPI4:/tmp/new_kernel/$KERNEL
scp arch/$ARCH/boot/dts/$DTB_PATH $RPI4:/tmp/new_kernel
ssh $RPI4 sudo rsync -av /tmp/new_modules/lib/modules/ /lib/modules/
ssh $RPI4 sudo rsync -av /tmp/new_kernel/ /boot/
rm -rf $TMP

Set config.txt of you RPi 4 In your Raspberry Pi 4, open the config file /boot/config.txt
  • comment/remove the dt_overlay=vc4-kms-v3d entry
  • add a device_tree=bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb entry
  • add a kernel=<image-name> entry

Why not Kworkflow? You can safely use the steps above, but if you are hacking the kernel and need to repeat this compiling and installing steps repeatedly, why don t try the Kworkflow? Kworkflow is a set of scripts to synthesize all steps to have a custom kernel compiled and installed in local and remote machines and it supports kernel building and deployment to Raspberry Pi machines for Raspbian 32 bit and 64 bit. After learning the kernel compilation and installation step by step, you can simply use kw bd command and have a custom kernel installed in your Raspberry Pi 4.
Note: the userspace 3D acceleration (glx/mesa) is working as expected on arm64, but the driver is not loaded yet for arm. Besides that, a bunch of pte invalid errors may appear when using 3D acceleration, it s a known issue that are still under investigation.

Shirish Agarwal: The Road to Gandolfo, Webforms, Hearing Loss info & Mum s Birthday.

The Road to Gandolfo I think I had read this book almost 10-12 years back and somehow ended up reading it up again. Apparently, he had put this fiction, story, book under some other pen name earlier. It is possible that I might have read it under that name and hence forgotten all about it. This book/story is full of innuendo, irony, sarcasm and basically the thrill of life. There are two main characters in the book, the first is General Mackenzie who has spent almost 3 to 4 decades being a spy/a counterintelligence expert in the Queen s service. And while he outclasses them all even at the ripe age of 50, he is thrown out under the pretext of conduct unbecoming of an officer. The other main character is Sam Devereaux. This gentleman is an army lawyer and is basically counting the days when he completes his tour of duty as a military lawyer and start his corporate civil law with somebody he knows. It is much to his dismay that while under a week is left for his tour of duty to be left over he is summoned to try and extradite General MacKenzie who has been put on house arrest. Apparently, in China there was a sculpture of a great Chinese gentleman in the nude. For reasons unknown or rather not being shared herein, he basically breaks part of the sculpture. This of course, enrages the Chinese and they call it a diplomatic accident and try to put the General into house arrest. Unfortunately for both the General and his captors, he decides to escape/go for it. While he does succeed entering the American embassy, he finds himself to be person non-grata and is thrown back outside where the Chinese recapture him. This is where the Embassy & the Govt. decide it would be better if somehow the General could be removed from China permanently so he doesn t cause any further diplomatic accidents. In order to do that Sam s services are bought. Now in order to understand the General, Sam learns that he has 4 ex-wives. He promptly goes and meet them to understand why the general behaved as he did. He apparently also peed on the American flag. To his surprise, all the four ex-wives are still very much in with the general. During the course of interviewing the ladies he is seduced by them and also gives names to their chests in order to differentiate between each one of them. Later he is seduced by the eldest of the four wives and they spend the evening together. Next day Sam meets and is promptly manhandled by the general and the diplomatic papers are seen by the general. After meeting the general and the Chinese counterpart, they quickly agree to extradite him as they do not know how to keep the general control. During his stay of house arrest, the General reads one of the communist rags as he puts it and gets the idea to kidnap the pope and that forms the basis of the story. Castel Gandolfo seems to be a real place which is in Italy and is apparently is the papal residence where s/he goes to reside every winter. The book is written in 1976 hence in the book, the General decides to form a corporation for which he would raise funds in order to make the kidnapping. The amount in 1976 was 40 million dollars and it was a big sum, to be with times, let s think of say 40 billion dollars so gets the scale of things. Now while a part of me wants to tell the rest of the story, the story isn t really mine to tell. Read The Road to Gandolfo for the rest. While I can t guarantee you much, I can say you might find yourself constantly amused by the antics of both the General, Sam and the General s ex-wives. There are also a few minute characters that you will meet on the way, hope you discover them and enjoy it immensely as I have. One thing I have to say, while I was reading it, I very much got vibes of Not a penny more, not a penny less by Jeffrey Archer. As shared before, lots of twists and turns, enjoy the ride

Webforms Webforms are nothing but a form you fill on the web or www. Webforms are and were a thing from early 90s to today. I was supposed to register for https://www.swavlambancard.gov.in/ almost a month back but procrastinated till few couple of days back and with good reason. I was hoping one of my good friends would help me but they had their own thing. So finally, I tried to fill the form few days back. It took me almost 30 odd attempts to finally fill the form and was given an enrollment number. Why it took me 30 odd attempts and with what should tell you the reason
  1. I felt like I was filling the form from 1990 s rather than today because
  2. The form doesn t know either its state or saves data during a session This lesson has been learned a long time back by almost all service providers except Govt. of India. Both the browsers on a mobile as well as desktop can save data during session. If you don t know what I mean by that go to about:preferences#privacy in Firefox and look at Manage Data. There you will find most sites do put some data along with cookies arguably to help make your web experience better. Chrome or Chromium has the same thing perhaps shared under a different name but its the same thing. But that is not all.
  3. None of the fields have any verification. The form is of 3 pages. The verification at the end of the document doesn t tell you what is wrong and what needs to be corrected. Really think on this, I am on a 24 LED monitor and I m filling the form and I had to do it at least 20-30 times before it was accepted. And guess what, I have no clue even about why it was selected. The same data, the same everything and after the nth time it accepted. Now if I am facing such a problem when I have some idea how technology works somewhat how are people who are trying to fill this form on 6 mobiles supposed to do? And many of them not at all clued in technology as I am.
I could go on outlining many of the issues that I faced but they are all similar in many ways the problems faced while filling the NEW Income Tax forms. Of course the New Income Tax portal is a whole ball-game in itself as it gives new errors every time instead of solving them. Most C.A. s have turned to third-party xml tools that enable you to upload xml compliant data to the New Income tax portal but this is for businesses and those who can afford it. Again, even that is in a sort of messy state but that is a whole another tale altogether. One of the reasons to my mind why the forms are designed the way they are so that people go to specific cybercafes or get individual people to fill and upload it and make more money. I was told to go to a specific cybercafe and meet a certain individual and he asked for INR 500/- to do the work. While I don t have financial problems, I was more worried about my data going into the wrong hands. But I can see a very steady way to make money without doing much hard work.

Hearing Loss info. Now because I had been both to Kamla Nehru Hospital as well as Sasoon and especially the deaf department, I saw many kids with half-formed ears. I had asked the doctors and they had shared this is due to malnutrition. We do know that women during pregnancies need more calories, more everything as they are eating for two bodies, not one. And this is large-scale, apparently more than 5 percent of population have children like this. And this number was of 2014, what is it today nobody knows. I also came to know that at least for some people like me, due to Covid they became deaf. I had asked the doctors if they knew of people who had become deaf due to Covid. They basically replied in the negative as they don t have the resources to monitor the same. The Govt. has an idea of health ID but just like Aadhar has to many serious sinister implications. Somebody had shared with me a long time back that in India systems work inspite of Govt. machinery rather than because of it. Meaning that the Government itself ties itself into several knots and then people have to be creative to try and figure a way out to help people. I found another issue while dealing with them. Apparently, even though I have 60% hearing loss I would be given a certificate of 40% hearing loss and they call it Temporary Progressive Loss. I saw almost all the people who had come, many of them having far severe defencies than me getting the same/similar certificate. All of them got Temporary Progressive. Some of the cases were real puzzling. For e.g. I met another Agarwal who had a severe accident few months ago and there is some kind of paralysis & bone issue. The doctors have given up but even that gentleman was given Temporary Progressive. From what little I could understand, the idea is that over period if there is possibility of things becoming better then it should be given. Another gentleman suffered a case of dwarfism. Even he was given the same certificate. Think there have been orders from above so that people even having difficulties are not helped. Another point if you look in a macro sense, it presents a somewhat rosy picture. If someone were to debunk the Govt. data either from India or abroad then from GOI perspective they have an agenda even though the people who are suffering are our brothers and sisters  And all of this is because I can read, write, articulate. Perhaps many of them may not even have a voice or a platform. Even to get this temporary progressive disability certificate there is more than 4 months of running from one place to the other, 4 months of culmination of work. This I can share and tell from my experience, who knows how much else others might have suffered for the same. In my case a review will happen after 5 years, in most other cases they have given only 1 year. Of course, this does justify people s jobs and perhaps partly it may be due to that. Such are times where I really miss that I am unable to hear otherwise could have fleshed out lot more other people s sufferings. And just so people know/understand this is happening in the heart of the city whose population easily exceeds 6 million plus and is supposed to be a progressive city. I do appreciate and understand the difficulties that the doctors are placed under.

Mum s Birthday & Social Engineering. While I don t want to get into details, in the last couple of weeks mum s birthday was there and that had totally escaped me. I have been trying to disassociate myself from her and at times it s hard and then you don t remember and somebody makes you remember. So, on one hand guilty, and the other do not know what to do. If she were alive I would have bought a piece of cake or something. Didn t feel like it, hence donated some money to the local aged home. This way at least I hope they have some semblance of peace. All of them are of her similar age group. The other thing that I began to observe in the earnest, fake identities have become the norm. Many people took elon musk s potrait using their own names in the handles, but even then Elon Free Speech Musk banned them. So much for free speech. Then I saw quite a few handles that have cute women as their profile picture but they are good at social engineering. This has started only a couple of weeks back and have seen quite a few handles leaving Twitter and joining Mastodon. Also, have been hearing that many admins of Mastodon pods are unable to get on top of this. Also, lot of people complaining as it isn t user-friendly UI as twitter is. Do they not realize that Twitter has its own IP and any competing network can t copy or infringe on their product. Otherwise, they will be sued like how Ford was & potentially win. I am not really gonna talk much about it as the blog post has become quite long and that needs its own post to do any sort of justice to it. Till later people

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppArmadillo 0.11.4.2.1 on CRAN: Updates

armadillo image Armadillo is a powerful and expressive C++ template library for linear algebra and scientific computing. It aims towards a good balance between speed and ease of use, has a syntax deliberately close to Matlab, and is useful for algorithm development directly in C++, or quick conversion of research code into production environments. RcppArmadillo integrates this library with the R environment and language and is widely used by (currently) 1027 packages other packages on CRAN, downloaded 26.9 million times (per the partial logs from the cloud mirrors of CRAN), and the CSDA paper (preprint / vignette) by Conrad and myself has been cited 503 times according to Google Scholar. This release reflect as new upstream bugfix release 11.4.2 made recently by Conrad. To accomodate CRAN and their preference for at most a release per month, we held it back since the 11.4.0 release early October. As we usually do, we generally update once upstream Armadillo releases are made. When we do not immediately release to CRAN (in order to lower the release cadence), we make those interim releases available via GitHub source and the Rcpp drat repo. This release also brings a rearranged, and as we think, simplified layout of the header files. All existing locations are still supported but we will be starting a (very patient and slow) transition at some point. The full set of changes (since the last CRAN release 0.11.4.0.1) follows.

Changes in RcppArmadillo version 0.11.4.2.1 (2022-11-08)
  • Upgraded to Armadillo release 11.4.2 (Ship of Theseus)
    • more robust handling of corner cases in multi-threaded contexts
  • Internal header organisation with new sub-directories while providing full compatibility via existing paths (#395 #396)

Changes in RcppArmadillo version 0.11.4.1.0 (2022-10-10) (GitHub Only)
  • Upgraded to Armadillo release 11.4.1 (Ship of Theseus)
    • fix data race in Cube::slice()
    • workarounds for false warnings emitted by GCC 12 when compiling with FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled (already in RcppArmadillo 0.11.4.0.1 too)

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is a diffstat report relative to previous release. More detailed information is on the RcppArmadillo page. Questions, comments etc should go to the rcpp-devel mailing list off the R-Forge page. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can sponsor me at GitHub.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

9 November 2022

Debian Brasil: Brasileiros(as) Mantenedores(as) e Desenvolvedores(as) Debian a partir de julho de 2015

Desde de setembro de 2015, o time de publicidade do Projeto Debian passou a publicar a cada dois meses listas com os nomes dos(as) novos(as) Desenvolvedores(as) Debian (DD - do ingl s Debian Developer) e Mantenedores(as) Debian (DM - do ingl s Debian Maintainer). Estamos aproveitando estas listas para publicar abaixo os nomes dos(as) brasileiros(as) que se tornaram Desenvolvedores(as) e Mantenedores(as) Debian a partir de julho de 2015. Desenvolvedores(as) Debian / Debian Developers / DDs: Marcos Talau Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich Gabriel F. T. Gomes Thiago Andrade Marques M rcio de Souza Oliveira Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana Samuel Henrique S rgio Durigan J nior Daniel Lenharo de Souza Giovani Augusto Ferreira Adriano Rafael Gomes Breno Leit o Lucas Kanashiro Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto Mantenedores(as) Debian / Debian Maintainers / DMs: Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo David da Silva Polverari Paulo Roberto Alves de Oliveira Sergio Almeida Cipriano Junior Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro William Grzybowski Tiago Ilieve
Observa es:
  1. Esta lista ser atualizada quando o time de publicidade do Debian publicar novas listas com DMs e DDs e tiver brasileiros.
  2. Para ver a lista completa de Mantenedores(as) e Desenvolvedores(as) Debian, inclusive outros(as) brasileiros(as) antes de julho de 2015 acesse: https://nm.debian.org/public/people

Debian Brasil: Brasileiros(as) Mantenedores(as) e Desenvolvedores(as) Debian a partir de julho de 2015

Desde de setembro de 2015, o time de publicidade do Projeto Debian passou a publicar a cada dois meses listas com os nomes dos(as) novos(as) Desenvolvedores(as) Debian (DD - do ingl s Debian Developer) e Mantenedores(as) Debian (DM - do ingl s Debian Maintainer). Estamos aproveitando estas listas para publicar abaixo os nomes dos(as) brasileiros(as) que se tornaram Desenvolvedores(as) e Mantenedores(as) Debian a partir de julho de 2015. Desenvolvedores(as) Debian / Debian Developers / DDs: Marcos Talau Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich Gabriel F. T. Gomes Thiago Andrade Marques M rcio de Souza Oliveira Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana Samuel Henrique S rgio Durigan J nior Daniel Lenharo de Souza Giovani Augusto Ferreira Adriano Rafael Gomes Breno Leit o Lucas Kanashiro Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto Mantenedores(as) Debian / Debian Maintainers / DMs: Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo David da Silva Polverari Paulo Roberto Alves de Oliveira Sergio Almeida Cipriano Junior Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro William Grzybowski Tiago Ilieve
Observa es:
  1. Esta lista ser atualizada quando o time de publicidade do Debian publicar novas listas com DMs e DDs e tiver brasileiros.
  2. Para ver a lista completa de Mantenedores(as) e Desenvolvedores(as) Debian, inclusive outros(as) brasileiros(as) antes de julho de 2015 acesse: https://nm.debian.org/public/people

8 November 2022

Antoine Beaupr : Using the bell as modern notification

Computer terminals have traditionally had an actual bell that would ring when a certain control character (the bell character, typically control-g or \a in an C escape sequence) would come in the input stream. That feature actually predates computers altogether, and was present in Baudot code, "an early character encoding for telegraphy invented by mile Baudot in the 1870s", itself superseding Morse code. Modern terminal emulators have, of course, kept that feature: if you run this command in a terminal right now:
printf '\a'
... you may hear some annoying beep. Or not. It actually depends on a lot of factors, including which terminal emulator you're using, how it's configured, whether you have headphones on, or speakers connected, or, if you're really old school, a PC speaker, even. Typically, I have this theory that it does the exact opposite of what you want, regardless of whether you have configured it or not. That is, if you want it to make noises, it won't, and if you want it to stay silent, it will make brutal, annoying noises in moments you would the least expect. I suspect this is a law in computer science, but I'm too lazy to come up with a formal definition. Yet something can be done with this.

Making the bell useful and silent Many terminal emulators have this feature where they can silence the bell somehow. It can be turned into a "visual bell" which basically flashes the screen when a bell arrives. Or that can also be disabled and the bell is just completely ignored. What I did instead is turn the bell into a "urgency hint" (part of the ICCCM standard. In xterm, this is done with this X resource entry (typically in ~/.Xresources):
XTerm*bellIsUrgent:  true
XTerm*visualBell: false
Interestingly, this doesn't clearly say "bell is muted", but it's effectively what it does. Or maybe it works because I have muted "System Sounds" in Pulseaudio. Who knows. I do have this in my startup scripts though:
xset b off
... which, according to the xset(1) manpage, means
If the dash or 'off' are given, the bell will be turned off.
Interestingly, you have the option of setting the bell "volume", "pitch, in hertz, and [...] duration in milliseconds. Note that not all hardware can vary the bell characteristics." In any case, I think that's the magic trick to turn the darn thing off. Now this should send urgency hints to your window manager:
sleep 3 ; printf '\a'
Try it: run the command, switch to another desktop, then wait 3 seconds. You should see the previous desktop show up in red or something. In the i3 window manager I am currently using, this is the default, although I did set the colors (client.urgent and urgent_workspace in bar.colors). Other window managers or desktop environments may require different configurations.

Sending a bell... Now that, on itself, will only be useful when something sets a bell. One place I had found a trick like this, long ago, is this post (dead link, archived) which has various instructions for different tools. I'll recopy some of them here since the original site is dead, but credit goes to the Netbuz blog. (Note that the blog post also features an Awesome WM configuration for urgency hints.)

Mutt
set beep=yes
set beep_new=yes

Irssi
/set beep_when_window_active ON
/set beep_when_away ON
/set beep_msg_level MSGS DCC DCCMSGS HILIGHT
It was also recommending this setting, but it appears to be deprecated and gives a warning in modern irssi versions:
/set bell_beeps ON

GNU Screen This is an important piece of the puzzle, because by default, terminal multiplexers have their own opinion of what to do with the bell as well:
# disabled: we want to propagate bell to clients, which should handle
# it in their own terminal settings. this  vbell off  is also the
# upstream and tmux's default
#
# see also: http://netbuz.org/blog/2011/11/x-bells-and-urgency-hints/
vbell off
# propagate bell from other windows up to the terminal emulator as well
bell_msg 'Bell in window %n^G'
The bell_msg bit is an extra from me: it uses the bell message that pops up when screen detects a bell in another window to resend the bell control character up to the running terminal. This makes it so a bell in any multiplexed window will also propagate to the parent terminal, which is not the default.

Tmux Untested, but that is apparently how you do it:
# listen to alerts from all windows
set -g bell-action any
# notice bell in windows
set -g monitor-bell on
# only propagate bell, don't warn user, as it hangs tmux for a second
set -g visual-bell off
# send bell *and* notify when activity (if monitor-activity)
set -g visual-activity both
Note that this config goes beyond what we have in GNU screen in that inactivity or activity will trigger a bell as well. This might be useful for cases where you don't have the prompt hack (below) but it could also very well be very noisy. It will only generate noise when monitor-activity is enabled though.

bash and shell prompts Now the icing on cake is to actually send the bell when a command completes. This is what I use this for the most, actually. I was previously using undistract-me for this, actually. That was nice: it would send me a nice desktop notification when a command was running more than a certain amount of time, and if the window was unfocused. But configuring this was a nightmare: because it uses a complex PROMPT_COMMAND in bash, it would conflict with my (already existing and way too) complex bash prompt, and lead to odd behaviors. It would also not work for remote commands, of course, as it wouldn't have access to my local D-BUS to send notifications (thankfully!). So instead, what I do now is systematically print a bell whenever a command terminates, in all my shells. I have this in my /root/.bashrc on all my servers, deployed in Puppet:
PROMPT_COMMAND='printf "\a"'
Or you can just put it directly in the shell prompt, with something like:
PS1='\[\a\]'"$PS1"
(I have the equivalent in my own .bashrc, although that thing is much more complex, featuring multi-command pipeline exit status, colors, terminal title setting, and more, which should probably warrant its own blog post.) This sounds a little bonkers and really noisy, but remember that I turned off the audible bell. And urgency hints are going to show up only if the window is unfocused. So it's actually really nice and not really distracting. Or, to reuse the undistract-me concept: it allows me to not lose focus too much when I'm waiting for a long process to complete. That idea actually came from ahf, so kudos to him on that nice hack.

Caveats That is not setup on all the machines I administer for work, that said. I'm afraid that would be too disruptive for people who do not have that configuration. This implies that I don't get notifications for commands that run for a long time on remote servers, most of the time. That said, I could simply run a command with a trailing printf '\a' to get a notification. This might not work in Wayland, your window manager, your desktop environment, your Linux console, or your telegraphy session.

6 November 2022

Russ Allbery: Review: Matrix

Review: Matrix, by Lauren Groff
Publisher: Riverhead Books
Copyright: 2021
ISBN: 0-698-40513-7
Format: Kindle
Pages: 260
Marie is a royal bastardess, a product of rape no less, and entirely out of place in the court in Westminster, where she landed after being kicked off her mother's farm. She had run the farm since her mother's untimely death, but there was no way that her relatives would let her inherit. In court, Marie is too tall, too ugly, and too strange, raised by women who were said to carry the blood of the fairy M lusine. Eleanor of Aquitaine's solution to her unwanted house guest is a Papal commission. Marie is to become the prioress of an abbey. I am occasionally unpleasantly reminded of why I don't read very much literary fiction. It's immensely frustrating to read a book in which the author cares about entirely different things than the reader, and where the story beats all land wrong. This is literary historical fiction set in the 12th century. Marie is Marie de France, author of the lais about courtly love that are famous primarily due to their position as early sources for the legends of King Arthur. The lais are written on-screen very early in this book, but they disappear without any meaningful impact on the story. Matrix is, instead, about Shaftesbury Abbey and what it becomes during Marie's time as prioress and then abbess, following the theory that Marie de France was Mary of Shaftesbury. What I thought I was getting in this book, from numerous reviews and recommendations, was a story of unexpected competence: how a wild, unwanted child of seventeen lands at a dilapidated and starving abbey, entirely against her will, and then over the next sixty years transforms it into one of the richest abbeys in England. This does happen in this book, but Groff doesn't seem to care about the details of that transformation at all. Instead, Matrix takes the mimetic fiction approach of detailed and precise description of a few characters, with all of their flaws and complexities, and with all of the narrative's attention turned to how they are feeling and what they are seeing. It is also deeply, fully committed to a Great Man (or in this case a Great Woman) view of history. Marie is singular. The narrative follows her alone, she makes all the significant decisions, and the development of the abbey is determined by her apparently mystical visions. (In typical mimetic fashion, these are presented as real to her, and the novel takes no position on whether that reality is objective.) She builds spy networks, maneuvers through local and church politics, and runs the abbey like her personal kingdom. The tiny amount of this that is necessarily done by other people is attributed to Marie's ability to judge character. Other people's motives are simply steamrolled over and have no effect. Maddeningly, essentially all of this happens off-screen, and Groff is completely uninterested in the details of how any of it is accomplished. Marie decides to do something, the narrative skips forward a year, and it has happened. She decides to build something, and then it's built. She decides to collect the rents she's due, the novel gestures vaguely at how she's intimidating, and then everyone is happily paying up. She builds spy networks; who cares how? She maneuvers through crises of local and church politics that are vaguely alluded to, through techniques that are apparently too uninteresting to bother the reader with. Instead, the narrative focuses on two things: her deeply dysfunctional, parasocial relationship with Eleanor, and her tyrannical relationship with the other nuns. I suspect that Groff would strongly disagree with my characterization of both of those narratives, and that's the other half of my problem with this book. Marie is obsessed with and in love with Eleanor, a completely impossible love to even talk about, and therefore turns to courtly love from afar as a model into which she can fit her feelings. While this is the setup for a tragedy, it's a good idea for a story. But what undermined it for me is that Marie's obsession seems to be largely physical (she constantly dwells on Eleanor's beauty), and Eleanor is absolutely horrible to her in every way: condescending, contemptuous, dismissive, and completely uninterested. This does change a bit over the course of the book, but not enough to justify the crush that Marie maintains for this awful person through her entire life. And Eleanor is the only person in the book who Marie treats like an equal. Everyone else is a subordinate, a daughter, a charge, a servant, or a worker. The nuns of the abbey prosper under her rule, so Marie has ample reason to justify this to herself, but no one else's opinions or beliefs matter to her in any significant way. The closest anyone can come to friendship is to be reliably obedient, perhaps after some initial objections that Marie overrules. Despite some quite good characterization of the other nuns, none of the other characters get to do anything. There is no delight in teamwork, sense of healthy community, or collaborative problem-solving. It's just all Marie, all the time, imposing her vision on the world both living and non-living through sheer force of will. This just isn't entertaining, at least for me. The writing might be beautiful, the descriptions detailed and effective, and the research clearly extensive, but I read books primarily for characters, I read characters primarily for their relationships, and these relationships are deeply, horribly unhealthy. They are not, to be clear, unrealistic (although I do think there's way too much chosen one in Marie and way too many problems that disappear off-camera); there are certainly people in the world with dysfunctional obsessive relationships, and there are charismatic people who overwhelm everyone around them. This is just not what I want to read about. You might think, with all I've said above, that I'm spoiling a lot of the book, but weirdly I don't think I am. Every pattern I mention above is well-established early in the novel. About the only thing that I'm spoiling is the hope that any of it is somehow going to change, a hope that I clung to for rather too long. This is a great setup for a book, and I wish it were written by a fantasy author instead of a literary author. Perhaps I'm being too harsh on literary fiction here, but I feel like fantasy authors are more likely to write for readers who want to see the growth sequence. If someone is going to change the world, I want to see how they changed the world. The mode of fantasy writing tends to think that what people do (and how they do it) is as interesting or more interesting than what they feel or what they perceive. If this idea, with the exact same level of (minor) mysticism and historic realism, without added magic, were written by, say, Guy Gavriel Kay or Nicola Griffith, it would be a far different and, in my opinion, a much better book. In fact, Hild is part of this book written by Nicola Griffith, and it is a much better book. I have seen enough people rave about this book to know that this is a personal reaction that is not going to be shared by everyone, or possibly even most people. My theory is that this is due to the different reading protocols between literary fiction readers and fantasy readers. I put myself in the latter camp; if you prefer literary fiction, you may like this much better (and also I'm not sure you'll find my book reviews useful). I may be wrong, though; maybe there are fantasy readers who would like this. I will say that the sense of place is very strong and the writing has all the expected literary strengths of descriptiveness and rhythm. But, sadly, this was not at all my thing, and I'm irritated that I wasted time on it. Rating: 4 out of 10

5 November 2022

Anuradha Weeraman: Getting started with Linkerd

If you ve done anything in the Kubernetes space in recent years, you ve most likely come across the words Service Mesh . It s backed by a set of mature technologies that provides cross-cutting networking, security, infrastructure capabilities to be used by workloads running in Kubernetes in a manner that is transparent to the actual workload. This abstraction enables application developers to not worry about building in otherwise sophisticated capabilities for networking, routing, circuit-breaking and security, and simply rely on the services offered by the service mesh.In this post, I ll be covering Linkerd, which is an alternative to Istio. It has gone through a significant re-write when it transitioned from the JVM to a Go-based Control Plane and a Rust-based Data Plane a few years back and is now a part of the CNCF and is backed by Buoyant. It has proven itself widely for use in production workloads and has a healthy community and release cadence.It achieves this with a side-car container that communicates with a Linkerd control plane that allows central management of policy, telemetry, mutual TLS, traffic routing, shaping, retries, load balancing, circuit-breaking and other cross-cutting concerns before the traffic hits the container. This has made the task of implementing the application services much simpler as it is managed by container orchestrator and service mesh. I covered Istio in a prior post a few years back, and much of the content is still applicable for this post, if you d like to have a look.Here are the broad architectural components of Linkerd:
The components are separated into the control plane and the data plane.The control plane components live in its own namespace and consists of a controller that the Linkerd CLI interacts with via the Kubernetes API. The destination service is used for service discovery, TLS identity, policy on access control for inter-service communication and service profile information on routing, retries, timeouts. The identity service acts as the Certificate Authority which responds to Certificate Signing Requests (CSRs) from proxies for initialization and for service-to-service encrypted traffic. The proxy injector is an admission webhook that injects the Linkerd proxy side car and the init container automatically into a pod when the linkerd.io/inject: enabled is available on the namespace or workload.On the data plane side are two components. First, the init container, which is responsible for automatically forwarding incoming and outgoing traffic through the Linkerd proxy via iptables rules. Second, the Linkerd proxy, which is a lightweight micro-proxy written in Rust, is the data plane itself.I will be walking you through the setup of Linkerd (2.12.2 at the time of writing) on a Kubernetes cluster.Let s see what s running on the cluster currently. This assumes you have a cluster running and kubectl is installed and available on the PATH.
$ kubectl get pods -A
NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
kube-system calico-kube-controllers-59697b644f-7fsln 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system calico-node-6ptsh 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system calico-node-7x5j8 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system calico-node-qlnf6 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system coredns-565d847f94-79jlw 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system coredns-565d847f94-fqwn4 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system etcd-k8s-master 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system kube-apiserver-k8s-master 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system kube-controller-manager-k8s-master 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system kube-proxy-4n9b7 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system kube-proxy-k4rzv 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system kube-proxy-lz2dd 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
kube-system kube-scheduler-k8s-master 1/1 Running 2 (119m ago) 7d
The first step would be to setup the Linkerd CLI:
$ curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSfL https://run.linkerd.io/install   sh
On most systems, this should be sufficient to setup the CLI. You may need to restart your terminal to load the updated paths. If you have a non-standard configuration and linkerd is not found after the installation, add the following to your PATH to be able to find the cli:
export PATH=$PATH:~/.linkerd2/bin/
At this point, checking the version would give you the following:
$ linkerd version
Client version: stable-2.12.2
Server version: unavailable
Setting up Linkerd Control PlaneBefore installing Linkerd on the cluster, run the following step to check the cluster for pre-requisites:
$ linkerd check --pre
Linkerd core checks
===================
kubernetes-api
--------------
can initialize the client
can query the Kubernetes API
kubernetes-version
------------------
is running the minimum Kubernetes API version
is running the minimum kubectl version
pre-kubernetes-setup
--------------------
control plane namespace does not already exist
can create non-namespaced resources
can create ServiceAccounts
can create Services
can create Deployments
can create CronJobs
can create ConfigMaps
can create Secrets
can read Secrets
can read extension-apiserver-authentication configmap
no clock skew detected
linkerd-version
---------------
can determine the latest version
cli is up-to-date
Status check results are  
All the pre-requisites appear to be good right now, and so installation can proceed.The first step of the installation is to setup the Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs) that Linkerd requires. The linkerd cli only prints the resource YAMLs to standard output and does not create them directly in Kubernetes, so you would need to pipe the output to kubectl apply to create the resources in the cluster that you re working with.
$ linkerd install --crds   kubectl apply -f -
Rendering Linkerd CRDs...
Next, run linkerd install kubectl apply -f - to install the control plane.
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/authorizationpolicies.policy.linkerd.io created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/httproutes.policy.linkerd.io created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/meshtlsauthentications.policy.linkerd.io created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/networkauthentications.policy.linkerd.io created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/serverauthorizations.policy.linkerd.io created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/servers.policy.linkerd.io created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/serviceprofiles.linkerd.io created
Next, install the Linkerd control plane components in the same manner, this time without the crds switch:
$ linkerd install   kubectl apply -f -       
namespace/linkerd created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-identity created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-identity created
serviceaccount/linkerd-identity created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-destination created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-destination created
serviceaccount/linkerd-destination created
secret/linkerd-sp-validator-k8s-tls created
validatingwebhookconfiguration.admissionregistration.k8s.io/linkerd-sp-validator-webhook-config created
secret/linkerd-policy-validator-k8s-tls created
validatingwebhookconfiguration.admissionregistration.k8s.io/linkerd-policy-validator-webhook-config created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-policy created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-destination-policy created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-heartbeat created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-heartbeat created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-heartbeat created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-heartbeat created
serviceaccount/linkerd-heartbeat created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-proxy-injector created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-proxy-injector created
serviceaccount/linkerd-proxy-injector created
secret/linkerd-proxy-injector-k8s-tls created
mutatingwebhookconfiguration.admissionregistration.k8s.io/linkerd-proxy-injector-webhook-config created
configmap/linkerd-config created
secret/linkerd-identity-issuer created
configmap/linkerd-identity-trust-roots created
service/linkerd-identity created
service/linkerd-identity-headless created
deployment.apps/linkerd-identity created
service/linkerd-dst created
service/linkerd-dst-headless created
service/linkerd-sp-validator created
service/linkerd-policy created
service/linkerd-policy-validator created
deployment.apps/linkerd-destination created
cronjob.batch/linkerd-heartbeat created
deployment.apps/linkerd-proxy-injector created
service/linkerd-proxy-injector created
secret/linkerd-config-overrides created
Kubernetes will start spinning up the data plane components and you should see the following when you list the pods:
$ kubectl get pods -A
...
linkerd linkerd-destination-67b9cc8749-xqcbx 4/4 Running 0 69s
linkerd linkerd-identity-59b46789cc-ntfcx 2/2 Running 0 69s
linkerd linkerd-proxy-injector-7fc85556bf-vnvw6 1/2 Running 0 69s
The components are running in the new linkerd namespace.To verify the setup, run a check:
$ linkerd check
Linkerd core checks
===================
kubernetes-api
--------------
can initialize the client
can query the Kubernetes API
kubernetes-version
------------------
is running the minimum Kubernetes API version
is running the minimum kubectl version
linkerd-existence
-----------------
'linkerd-config' config map exists
heartbeat ServiceAccount exist
control plane replica sets are ready
no unschedulable pods
control plane pods are ready
cluster networks contains all pods
cluster networks contains all services
linkerd-config
--------------
control plane Namespace exists
control plane ClusterRoles exist
control plane ClusterRoleBindings exist
control plane ServiceAccounts exist
control plane CustomResourceDefinitions exist
control plane MutatingWebhookConfigurations exist
control plane ValidatingWebhookConfigurations exist
proxy-init container runs as root user if docker container runtime is used
linkerd-identity
----------------
certificate config is valid
trust anchors are using supported crypto algorithm
trust anchors are within their validity period
trust anchors are valid for at least 60 days
issuer cert is using supported crypto algorithm
issuer cert is within its validity period
issuer cert is valid for at least 60 days
issuer cert is issued by the trust anchor
linkerd-webhooks-and-apisvc-tls
-------------------------------
proxy-injector webhook has valid cert
proxy-injector cert is valid for at least 60 days
sp-validator webhook has valid cert
sp-validator cert is valid for at least 60 days
policy-validator webhook has valid cert
policy-validator cert is valid for at least 60 days
linkerd-version
---------------
can determine the latest version
cli is up-to-date
control-plane-version
---------------------
can retrieve the control plane version
control plane is up-to-date
control plane and cli versions match
linkerd-control-plane-proxy
---------------------------
control plane proxies are healthy
control plane proxies are up-to-date
control plane proxies and cli versions match
Status check results are  
Everything looks good.Setting up the Viz ExtensionAt this point, the required components for the service mesh are setup, but let s also install the viz extension, which provides a good visualization capabilities that will come in handy subsequently. Once again, linkerd uses the same pattern for installing the extension.
$ linkerd viz install   kubectl apply -f -
namespace/linkerd-viz created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-metrics-api created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-metrics-api created
serviceaccount/metrics-api created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-prometheus created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-prometheus created
serviceaccount/prometheus created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap-admin created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap-auth-delegator created
serviceaccount/tap created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap-auth-reader created
secret/tap-k8s-tls created
apiservice.apiregistration.k8s.io/v1alpha1.tap.linkerd.io created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/web created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/web created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-check created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-check created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-admin created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-api created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-api created
serviceaccount/web created
server.policy.linkerd.io/admin created
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io/admin created
networkauthentication.policy.linkerd.io/kubelet created
server.policy.linkerd.io/proxy-admin created
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io/proxy-admin created
service/metrics-api created
deployment.apps/metrics-api created
server.policy.linkerd.io/metrics-api created
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io/metrics-api created
meshtlsauthentication.policy.linkerd.io/metrics-api-web created
configmap/prometheus-config created
service/prometheus created
deployment.apps/prometheus created
service/tap created
deployment.apps/tap created
server.policy.linkerd.io/tap-api created
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io/tap created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-tap-injector created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/linkerd-tap-injector created
serviceaccount/tap-injector created
secret/tap-injector-k8s-tls created
mutatingwebhookconfiguration.admissionregistration.k8s.io/linkerd-tap-injector-webhook-config created
service/tap-injector created
deployment.apps/tap-injector created
server.policy.linkerd.io/tap-injector-webhook created
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io/tap-injector created
networkauthentication.policy.linkerd.io/kube-api-server created
service/web created
deployment.apps/web created
serviceprofile.linkerd.io/metrics-api.linkerd-viz.svc.cluster.local created
serviceprofile.linkerd.io/prometheus.linkerd-viz.svc.cluster.local created
A few seconds later, you should see the following in your pod list:
$ kubectl get pods -A
...
linkerd-viz prometheus-b5865f776-w5ssf 1/2 Running 0 35s
linkerd-viz tap-64f5c8597b-rqgbk 2/2 Running 0 35s
linkerd-viz tap-injector-7c75cfff4c-wl9mx 2/2 Running 0 34s
linkerd-viz web-8c444745-jhzr5 2/2 Running 0 34s
The viz components live in the linkerd-viz namespace.You can now checkout the viz dashboard:
$ linkerd viz dashboard
Linkerd dashboard available at:
http://localhost:50750
Grafana dashboard available at:
http://localhost:50750/grafana
Opening Linkerd dashboard in the default browser
Opening in existing browser session.
The Meshed column indicates the workload that is currently integrated with the Linkerd control plane. As you can see, there are no application deployments right now that are running.Injecting the Linkerd Data Plane componentsThere are two ways to integrate Linkerd to the application containers:1 by manually injecting the Linkerd data plane components
2 by instructing Kubernetes to automatically inject the data plane componentsInject Linkerd data plane manuallyLet s try the first option. Below is a simple nginx-app that I will deploy into the cluster:
$ cat deploy.yaml 
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx-deployment
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginx
replicas: 2
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 80
$ kubectl apply -f deploy.yaml
Back in the viz dashboard, I do see the workload deployed, but it isn t currently communicating with the Linkerd control plane, and so doesn t show any metrics, and the Meshed count is 0:
Looking at the Pod s deployment YAML, I can see that it only includes the nginx container:
$ kubectl get pod nginx-deployment-cd55c47f5-cgxw2 -o yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
annotations:
cni.projectcalico.org/containerID: aee0295dda906f7935ce5c150ae30360005f5330e98c75a550b7cc0d1532f529
cni.projectcalico.org/podIP: 172.16.36.89/32
cni.projectcalico.org/podIPs: 172.16.36.89/32
creationTimestamp: "2022-11-05T19:35:12Z"
generateName: nginx-deployment-cd55c47f5-
labels:
app: nginx
pod-template-hash: cd55c47f5
name: nginx-deployment-cd55c47f5-cgxw2
namespace: default
ownerReferences:
- apiVersion: apps/v1
blockOwnerDeletion: true
controller: true
kind: ReplicaSet
name: nginx-deployment-cd55c47f5
uid: b604f5c4-f662-4333-aaa0-bd1a2b8b08c6
resourceVersion: "22979"
uid: 8fe30214-491b-4753-9fb2-485b6341376c
spec:
containers:
- image: nginx:latest
imagePullPolicy: Always
name: nginx
ports:
- containerPort: 80
protocol: TCP
resources:
terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
terminationMessagePolicy: File
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount
name: kube-api-access-2bt6z
readOnly: true
dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst
enableServiceLinks: true
nodeName: k8s-node1
preemptionPolicy: PreemptLowerPriority
priority: 0
restartPolicy: Always
schedulerName: default-scheduler
securityContext:
serviceAccount: default
serviceAccountName: default
terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30
tolerations:
- effect: NoExecute
key: node.kubernetes.io/not-ready
operator: Exists
tolerationSeconds: 300
- effect: NoExecute
key: node.kubernetes.io/unreachable
operator: Exists
tolerationSeconds: 300
volumes:
- name: kube-api-access-2bt6z
projected:
defaultMode: 420
sources:
- serviceAccountToken:
expirationSeconds: 3607
path: token
- configMap:
items:
- key: ca.crt
path: ca.crt
name: kube-root-ca.crt
- downwardAPI:
items:
- fieldRef:
apiVersion: v1
fieldPath: metadata.namespace
path: namespace
status:
conditions:
- lastProbeTime: null
lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-05T19:35:12Z"
status: "True"
type: Initialized
- lastProbeTime: null
lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-05T19:35:16Z"
status: "True"
type: Ready
- lastProbeTime: null
lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-05T19:35:16Z"
status: "True"
type: ContainersReady
- lastProbeTime: null
lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-05T19:35:13Z"
status: "True"
type: PodScheduled
containerStatuses:
- containerID: containerd://f088f200315b44cbeed16499aba9b2d1396f9f81645e53b032d4bfa44166128a
image: docker.io/library/nginx:latest
imageID: docker.io/library/nginx@sha256:943c25b4b66b332184d5ba6bb18234273551593016c0e0ae906bab111548239f
lastState:
name: nginx
ready: true
restartCount: 0
started: true
state:
running:
startedAt: "2022-11-05T19:35:15Z"
hostIP: 192.168.2.216
phase: Running
podIP: 172.16.36.89
podIPs:
- ip: 172.16.36.89
qosClass: BestEffort
startTime: "2022-11-05T19:35:12Z"
Let s directly inject the linkerd data plane into this running container. We do this by retrieving the YAML of the deployment, piping it to linkerd cli to inject the necessary components and then piping to kubectl apply the changed resources.
$ kubectl get deploy nginx-deployment -o yaml   linkerd inject -   kubectl apply -f -
deployment "nginx-deployment" injected
deployment.apps/nginx-deployment configured
Back in the viz dashboard, the workload now is integrated into Linkerd control plane.
Looking at the updated Pod definition, we see a number of changes that the linkerd has injected that allows it to integrate with the control plane. Let s have a look:
$ kubectl get pod nginx-deployment-858bdd545b-55jpf -o yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
annotations:
cni.projectcalico.org/containerID: 1ec3d345f859be8ead0374a7e880bcfdb9ba74a121b220a6fccbd342ac4b7ea8
cni.projectcalico.org/podIP: 172.16.36.90/32
cni.projectcalico.org/podIPs: 172.16.36.90/32
linkerd.io/created-by: linkerd/proxy-injector stable-2.12.2
linkerd.io/inject: enabled
linkerd.io/proxy-version: stable-2.12.2
linkerd.io/trust-root-sha256: 354fe6f49331e8e03d8fb07808e00a3e145d2661181cbfec7777b41051dc8e22
viz.linkerd.io/tap-enabled: "true"
creationTimestamp: "2022-11-05T19:44:15Z"
generateName: nginx-deployment-858bdd545b-
labels:
app: nginx
linkerd.io/control-plane-ns: linkerd
linkerd.io/proxy-deployment: nginx-deployment
linkerd.io/workload-ns: default
pod-template-hash: 858bdd545b
name: nginx-deployment-858bdd545b-55jpf
namespace: default
ownerReferences:
- apiVersion: apps/v1
blockOwnerDeletion: true
controller: true
kind: ReplicaSet
name: nginx-deployment-858bdd545b
uid: 2e618972-aa10-4e35-a7dd-084853673a80
resourceVersion: "23820"
uid: 62f1857a-b701-4a19-8996-b5b605ff8488
spec:
containers:
- env:
- name: _pod_name
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
apiVersion: v1
fieldPath: metadata.name
- name: _pod_ns
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
apiVersion: v1
fieldPath: metadata.namespace
- name: _pod_nodeName
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
apiVersion: v1
fieldPath: spec.nodeName
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_LOG
value: warn,linkerd=info
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_LOG_FORMAT
value: plain
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_DESTINATION_SVC_ADDR
value: linkerd-dst-headless.linkerd.svc.cluster.local.:8086
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_DESTINATION_PROFILE_NETWORKS
value: 10.0.0.0/8,100.64.0.0/10,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_POLICY_SVC_ADDR
value: linkerd-policy.linkerd.svc.cluster.local.:8090
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_POLICY_WORKLOAD
value: $(_pod_ns):$(_pod_name)
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_INBOUND_DEFAULT_POLICY
value: all-unauthenticated
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_POLICY_CLUSTER_NETWORKS
value: 10.0.0.0/8,100.64.0.0/10,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_INBOUND_CONNECT_TIMEOUT
value: 100ms
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_OUTBOUND_CONNECT_TIMEOUT
value: 1000ms
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_CONTROL_LISTEN_ADDR
value: 0.0.0.0:4190
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_ADMIN_LISTEN_ADDR
value: 0.0.0.0:4191
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_OUTBOUND_LISTEN_ADDR
value: 127.0.0.1:4140
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_INBOUND_LISTEN_ADDR
value: 0.0.0.0:4143
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_INBOUND_IPS
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
apiVersion: v1
fieldPath: status.podIPs
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_INBOUND_PORTS
value: "80"
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_DESTINATION_PROFILE_SUFFIXES
value: svc.cluster.local.
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_INBOUND_ACCEPT_KEEPALIVE
value: 10000ms
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_OUTBOUND_CONNECT_KEEPALIVE
value: 10000ms
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_INBOUND_PORTS_DISABLE_PROTOCOL_DETECTION
value: 25,587,3306,4444,5432,6379,9300,11211
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_DESTINATION_CONTEXT
value:
"ns":"$(_pod_ns)", "nodeName":"$(_pod_nodeName)"
- name: _pod_sa
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
apiVersion: v1
fieldPath: spec.serviceAccountName
- name: _l5d_ns
value: linkerd
- name: _l5d_trustdomain
value: cluster.local
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_IDENTITY_DIR
value: /var/run/linkerd/identity/end-entity
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_IDENTITY_TRUST_ANCHORS
value:
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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-----END CERTIFICATE-----
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_IDENTITY_TOKEN_FILE
value: /var/run/secrets/tokens/linkerd-identity-token
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_IDENTITY_SVC_ADDR
value: linkerd-identity-headless.linkerd.svc.cluster.local.:8080
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_IDENTITY_LOCAL_NAME
value: $(_pod_sa).$(_pod_ns).serviceaccount.identity.linkerd.cluster.local
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_IDENTITY_SVC_NAME
value: linkerd-identity.linkerd.serviceaccount.identity.linkerd.cluster.local
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_DESTINATION_SVC_NAME
value: linkerd-destination.linkerd.serviceaccount.identity.linkerd.cluster.local
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_POLICY_SVC_NAME
value: linkerd-destination.linkerd.serviceaccount.identity.linkerd.cluster.local
- name: LINKERD2_PROXY_TAP_SVC_NAME
value: tap.linkerd-viz.serviceaccount.identity.linkerd.cluster.local
image: cr.l5d.io/linkerd/proxy:stable-2.12.2
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
lifecycle:
postStart:
exec:
command:
- /usr/lib/linkerd/linkerd-await
- --timeout=2m
livenessProbe:
failureThreshold: 3
httpGet:
path: /live
port: 4191
scheme: HTTP
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 10
successThreshold: 1
timeoutSeconds: 1
name: linkerd-proxy
ports:
- containerPort: 4143
name: linkerd-proxy
protocol: TCP
- containerPort: 4191
name: linkerd-admin
protocol: TCP
readinessProbe:
failureThreshold: 3
httpGet:
path: /ready
port: 4191
scheme: HTTP
initialDelaySeconds: 2
periodSeconds: 10
successThreshold: 1
timeoutSeconds: 1
resources:
securityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
runAsUser: 2102
terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
terminationMessagePolicy: FallbackToLogsOnError
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: /var/run/linkerd/identity/end-entity
name: linkerd-identity-end-entity
- mountPath: /var/run/secrets/tokens
name: linkerd-identity-token
- mountPath: /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount
name: kube-api-access-9zpnn
readOnly: true
- image: nginx:latest
imagePullPolicy: Always
name: nginx
ports:
- containerPort: 80
protocol: TCP
resources:
terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
terminationMessagePolicy: File
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount
name: kube-api-access-9zpnn
readOnly: true
dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst
enableServiceLinks: true
initContainers:
- args:
- --incoming-proxy-port
- "4143"
- --outgoing-proxy-port
- "4140"
- --proxy-uid
- "2102"
- --inbound-ports-to-ignore
- 4190,4191,4567,4568
- --outbound-ports-to-ignore
- 4567,4568
image: cr.l5d.io/linkerd/proxy-init:v2.0.0
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
name: linkerd-init
resources:
limits:
cpu: 100m
memory: 20Mi
requests:
cpu: 100m
memory: 20Mi
securityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
capabilities:
add:
- NET_ADMIN
- NET_RAW
privileged: false
readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
runAsNonRoot: true
runAsUser: 65534
terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
terminationMessagePolicy: FallbackToLogsOnError
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: /run
name: linkerd-proxy-init-xtables-lock
- mountPath: /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount
name: kube-api-access-9zpnn
readOnly: true
nodeName: k8s-node1
preemptionPolicy: PreemptLowerPriority
priority: 0
restartPolicy: Always
schedulerName: default-scheduler
securityContext:
serviceAccount: default
serviceAccountName: default
terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30
tolerations:
- effect: NoExecute
key: node.kubernetes.io/not-ready
operator: Exists
tolerationSeconds: 300
- effect: NoExecute
key: node.kubernetes.io/unreachable
operator: Exists
tolerationSeconds: 300
volumes:
- name: kube-api-access-9zpnn
projected:
defaultMode: 420
sources:
- serviceAccountToken:
expirationSeconds: 3607
path: token
- configMap:
items:
- key: ca.crt
path: ca.crt
name: kube-root-ca.crt
- downwardAPI:
items:
- fieldRef:
apiVersion: v1
fieldPath: metadata.namespace
path: namespace
- emptyDir:
name: linkerd-proxy-init-xtables-lock
- emptyDir:
medium: Memory
name: linkerd-identity-end-entity
- name: linkerd-identity-token
projected:
defaultMode: 420
sources:
- serviceAccountToken:
audience: identity.l5d.io
expirationSeconds: 86400
path: linkerd-identity-token
status:
conditions:
- lastProbeTime: null
lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-05T19:44:16Z"
status: "True"
type: Initialized
- lastProbeTime: null
lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-05T19:44:19Z"
status: "True"
type: Ready
- lastProbeTime: null
lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-05T19:44:19Z"
status: "True"
type: ContainersReady
- lastProbeTime: null
lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-05T19:44:15Z"
status: "True"
type: PodScheduled
containerStatuses:
- containerID: containerd://62028867c48aaa726df48249a27c52cd8820cd33e8e5695ad0d322540924754e
image: cr.l5d.io/linkerd/proxy:stable-2.12.2
imageID: cr.l5d.io/linkerd/proxy@sha256:787db5055b2a46a3c4318ef3b632461261f81254c8e47bf4b9b8dab2c42575e4
lastState:
name: linkerd-proxy
ready: true
restartCount: 0
started: true
state:
running:
startedAt: "2022-11-05T19:44:16Z"
- containerID: containerd://8f8ce663c19360a7b6868ace68a4a5119f0b18cd57ffebcc2d19331274038381
image: docker.io/library/nginx:latest
imageID: docker.io/library/nginx@sha256:943c25b4b66b332184d5ba6bb18234273551593016c0e0ae906bab111548239f
lastState:
name: nginx
ready: true
restartCount: 0
started: true
state:
running:
startedAt: "2022-11-05T19:44:19Z"
hostIP: 192.168.2.216
initContainerStatuses:
- containerID: containerd://c0417ea9c8418ab296bf86077e81c5d8be06fe9b87390c138d1c5d7b73cc577c
image: cr.l5d.io/linkerd/proxy-init:v2.0.0
imageID: cr.l5d.io/linkerd/proxy-init@sha256:7d5e66b9e176b1ebbdd7f40b6385d1885e82c80a06f4c6af868247bb1dffe262
lastState:
name: linkerd-init
ready: true
restartCount: 0
state:
terminated:
containerID: containerd://c0417ea9c8418ab296bf86077e81c5d8be06fe9b87390c138d1c5d7b73cc577c
exitCode: 0
finishedAt: "2022-11-05T19:44:16Z"
reason: Completed
startedAt: "2022-11-05T19:44:15Z"
phase: Running
podIP: 172.16.36.90
podIPs:
- ip: 172.16.36.90
qosClass: Burstable
startTime: "2022-11-05T19:44:15Z"
At this point, the necessary components are setup for you to explore Linkerd further. You can also try out the jaeger and multicluster extensions, similar to the process of installing and using the viz extension and try out their capabilities.Inject Linkerd data plane automaticallyIn this approach, we shall we how to instruct Kubernetes to automatically inject the Linkerd data plane to workloads at deployment time.We can achieve this by adding the linkerd.io/inject annotation to the deployment descriptor which causes the proxy injector admission hook to execute and inject linkerd data plane components automatically at the time of deployment.
$ cat deploy.yaml 
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx-deployment
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginx
replicas: 2
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginx
annotations:
linkerd.io/inject: enabled
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 80
This annotation can also be specified at the namespace level to affect all the workloads within the namespace. Note that any resources created before the annotation was added to the namespace will require a rollout restart to trigger the injection of the Linkerd components.Uninstalling LinkerdNow that we have walked through the installation and setup process of Linkerd, let s also cover how to remove it from the infrastructure and go back to the state prior to its installation.The first step would be to remove extensions, such as viz.
$ linkerd viz uninstall   kubectl delete -f -
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-metrics-api" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-prometheus" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap-admin" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-api" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-check" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-tap-injector" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-metrics-api" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-prometheus" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap-auth-delegator" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-admin" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-api" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-web-check" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-tap-injector" deleted
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "web" deleted
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-viz-tap-auth-reader" deleted
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "web" deleted
apiservice.apiregistration.k8s.io "v1alpha1.tap.linkerd.io" deleted
mutatingwebhookconfiguration.admissionregistration.k8s.io "linkerd-tap-injector-webhook-config" deleted
namespace "linkerd-viz" deleted
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io "admin" deleted
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io "metrics-api" deleted
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io "proxy-admin" deleted
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io "tap" deleted
authorizationpolicy.policy.linkerd.io "tap-injector" deleted
server.policy.linkerd.io "admin" deleted
server.policy.linkerd.io "metrics-api" deleted
server.policy.linkerd.io "proxy-admin" deleted
server.policy.linkerd.io "tap-api" deleted
server.policy.linkerd.io "tap-injector-webhook" deleted
In order to uninstall the control plane, you would need to first uninject the Linkerd control plane components from any existing running pods by:
$ kubectl get deployments
NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
nginx-deployment 2/2 2 2 10m
$ kubectl get deployment nginx-deployment -o yaml   linkerd uninject -   kubectl apply -f -
deployment "nginx-deployment" uninjected
deployment.apps/nginx-deployment configured
Now you can delete the control plane.
$ linkerd uninstall   kubectl delete -f -
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-heartbeat" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-destination" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-identity" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-proxy-injector" deleted
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-policy" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-destination-policy" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-heartbeat" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-destination" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-identity" deleted
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-linkerd-proxy-injector" deleted
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-heartbeat" deleted
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "linkerd-heartbeat" deleted
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io "authorizationpolicies.policy.linkerd.io" deleted
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io "httproutes.policy.linkerd.io" deleted
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io "meshtlsauthentications.policy.linkerd.io" deleted
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io "networkauthentications.policy.linkerd.io" deleted
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io "serverauthorizations.policy.linkerd.io" deleted
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io "servers.policy.linkerd.io" deleted
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io "serviceprofiles.linkerd.io" deleted
mutatingwebhookconfiguration.admissionregistration.k8s.io "linkerd-proxy-injector-webhook-config" deleted
validatingwebhookconfiguration.admissionregistration.k8s.io "linkerd-policy-validator-webhook-config" deleted
validatingwebhookconfiguration.admissionregistration.k8s.io "linkerd-sp-validator-webhook-config" deleted
namespace "linkerd" deleted
At this point we re back to the original state:
$ kubectl get pods -A
NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
default nginx-deployment-cd55c47f5-99xf2 1/1 Running 0 82s
default nginx-deployment-cd55c47f5-tt58t 1/1 Running 0 86s
kube-system calico-kube-controllers-59697b644f-7fsln 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d1h
kube-system calico-node-6ptsh 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d1h
kube-system calico-node-7x5j8 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d1h
kube-system calico-node-qlnf6 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d1h
kube-system coredns-565d847f94-79jlw 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
kube-system coredns-565d847f94-fqwn4 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
kube-system etcd-k8s-master 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
kube-system kube-apiserver-k8s-master 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
kube-system kube-controller-manager-k8s-master 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
kube-system kube-proxy-4n9b7 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
kube-system kube-proxy-k4rzv 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
kube-system kube-proxy-lz2dd 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
kube-system kube-scheduler-k8s-master 1/1 Running 2 (3h39m ago) 7d2h
I hope you find this useful to get you started on your journey with Linkerd. Head on over to the docs for more information, guides and best practices.

4 November 2022

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Book Review: Chokepoint Capitalism, by Rebecca Giblin and Cory Doctorow

Two weeks ago, I had the chance to go see Cory Doctorow at my local independent bookstore, in Montr al. He was there to present his latest essay, co-written with Rebecca Giblin1. Titled Chokepoint Capitalism: How Big Tech and Big Content Captured Creative Labor Markets and How We'll Win Them Back, it focuses on the impact of monopolies and monopsonies (more on this later) on creative workers. The book is divided in two main parts: A picture of the book cover Although Doctorow is known for his strong political stances, I have to say I'm quite surprised by the quality of the research Giblin and he did for this book. They both show a pretty advanced understanding of the market dynamics they look at, and even though most of the solutions they propose aren't new or groundbreaking, they manage to be convincing and clear. That is to say, you certainly don't need to be an economist to understand or enjoy this book :) As I have mentioned before, the book heavily criticises monopolies, but also monopsonies a market structure that has only one buyer (instead of one seller). I find this quite interesting, as whereas people are often familiar with the concept of monopolies, monopsonies are frequently overlooked. The classic example of a monopsony is a labor market with a single employer: there is a multitude of workers trying to sell their labor power, but in the end, working conditions are dictated by the sole employer, who gets to decide who has a job and who hasn't. Mining towns are good real-world examples of monopsonies. In the book, the authors argue most of the contemporary work produced by creative workers (especially musicians and writers) is sold to monopsonies and oligopsonies, like Amazon2 or major music labels. This creates a situation where the consumers are less directly affected by the lack of competition in the market (they often get better prices), but where creators have an increasingly hard time making ends meet. Not only this, but natural monopsonies3 are relatively rare, making the case for breaking the existing ones even stronger. Apart from the evident need to actually start applying (the quite good) antitrust laws in the USA, some of the other solutions put forward are: Overall, I found this book quite enjoying and well written. Since I am not a creative worker myself and don't experience first-hand the hardships presented in the book, it was the occasion for me to delve more deeply in this topic. Chances are I'll reuse some of the expos s in my classes too.

  1. Professor at the Melbourne Law School and Director of the Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, amongst other things. More on her here.
  2. Amazon owns more than 50% of the US physical book retail market and has an even higher market share for ebooks and audiobooks (via Audible). Not only this, but with the decline of the physical book market, audiobooks are an increasingly important source of revenue for authors.
  3. Natural monopolies happen when it does not make economic sense for multiple enterprises to compete in a market. Critical infrastructures, like water supply or electricity, make for good examples of natural monopolies. It simply wouldn't be efficient to have 10 separate electrical cables connecting your house to 10 separate electric grids. In my opinion, such monopolies are acceptable (and even desirable), as long as they are collectively owned, either by the State or by local entities (municipalities, non-profits, etc.).

3 November 2022

Steve Kemp: Alphabetical linting ..

So this week I recycled a talk I'd given in the past, about how even using extremely simple parsers allows a lot of useful static-analysis to be done, for specific niche use-cases. This included examples of scanning comments above classes to ensure they referred to the appropriate object, ensuring that specific function calls always included a specific (optional) parameter, etc. Nothing too complex, but I figured I'd give a new example this time, and I remembered I'd recently written a bunch of functions for an interpreter which I'd ordered quite deliberately. Assume you're writing a BASIC interpreter, you need to implement a bunch of built-in maths functions such as SIN, COS, TAN, then some string-related functions LEFT$, RIGHT$, MID$, etc. When it comes to ordering there are a couple of approaches: Personal preference probably dictates the choice you make, but either way I think it would be rational and obvious that you'd put the functions in alphabetical order:
func ABS( args []primitive.Object) (primitive.Object, error)  
.. 
func COS( args []primitive.Object) (primitive.Object, error)  
.. 
func SIN( args []primitive.Object) (primitive.Object, error)  
.. 
func TAN( args []primitive.Object) (primitive.Object, error)  
.. 
I did that myself, and I wrote a perl-script to just parse the file using a simple regexp "^func\s+([^(]+)\(" but then I figured this was a good time to write a real static-analysis tool. The golang environment is full of trivial little linters for various purposes, and the standard "go vet .." driver makes it easy to invoke them. Realizing that I was going to get driven in the same way it was obvious I'd write something called "alphaVet". So anyway, half written for a talk, half-written because of the name:

Arturo Borrero Gonz lez: New OpenPGP key and new email

Post logo I m trying to replace my old OpenPGP key with a new one. The old key wasn t compromised or lost or anything bad. Is still valid, but I plan to get rid of it soon. It was created in 2013. The new key id fingerprint is: AA66280D4EF0BFCC6BFC2104DA5ECB231C8F04C4 I plan to use the new key for things like encrypted emails, uploads to the Debian archive, and more. Also, the new key includes an identity with a newer personal email address I plan to use soon: arturo.bg@arturo.bg The new key has been uploaded to some public keyservers. If you would like to sign the new key, please follow the steps in the Debian wiki.
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=UABf
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
If you are curious about what that long code block contains, check this https://cirw.in/gpg-decoder/ For the record, the old key fingerprint is: DD9861AB23DC3333892E07A968E713981D1515F8 Cheers!

Alastair McKinstry: New Planning and Environment Court will reform planning appeals pro...

New Planning and Environment Court will reform planning appeals process #GreensInGovernment The Green Party has fulfilled an important Programme for Government commitment following the cabinet's decision to establish a new division of the High Court to specialise in environmental and planning issues. This is a major reform that will allow planning law to operate in a more efficient and environmentally friendly manner. Steven Matthews TD, Green Party Spokesperson for Planning and Local Government, explained the aim of the new court; The goal is to ensure that our judicial system has the capacity to decide cases as quickly as possible within a growing and increasingly complex body of Irish and EU environmental law. Timely access to justice is a cornersto ne of the effective rule of law and an international legal commitment Ireland has entered under the Aarhus Convention. This is extremely pressing given the urgent need to ease the pressure on the housing system and develop the infrastructure we need to transition to a zero-carbon economy." The Green Party is committed to ensuring the new Court will have the resources to fulfil its role. The Government will pass new legislation to allow the number of judges to be increased and provide the necessary exchequer funding to pay for these judges. The new Court will hear all the cases currently taken by the High Court s Commercial Planning and Strategic Infrastructure Development List and other major environmental cases. This is likely to include all major infrastructure cases as well as many cases relating to EU Environmental Law such as Environmental Impact Assessment, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Birds/Habitats, the Water Framework Directive and the Industrial Emissions Directive.

Russ Allbery: Review: Carpe Jugulum

Review: Carpe Jugulum, by Terry Pratchett
Series: Discworld #23
Publisher: Harper
Copyright: 1998
Printing: May 2014
ISBN: 0-06-228014-7
Format: Mass market
Pages: 409
Carpe Jugulum is the 23rd Discworld novel and the 6th witches novel. I would not recommend reading it before Maskerade, which introduces Agnes. There are some spoilers for Wyrd Sisters, Lords and Ladies, and Maskerade in the setup here and hence in the plot description below. I don't think they matter that much, but if you're avoiding all spoilers for earlier books, you may want to skip over this one. (You're unlikely to want to read it before those books anyway.) It is time to name the child of the king of Lancre, and in a gesture of good will and modernization, he has invited his neighbors in Uberwald to attend. Given that those neighbors are vampires, an open invitation was perhaps not the wisest choice. Meanwhile, Granny Weatherwax's invitation has gone missing. On the plus side, that meant she was home to be summoned to the bedside of a pregnant woman who was kicked by a cow, where she makes the type of hard decision that Granny has been making throughout the series. On the minus side, the apparent snub seems to send her into a spiral of anger at the lack of appreciation. Points off right from the start for a plot based on a misunderstanding and a subsequent refusal of people to simply talk to each other. It is partly engineered, but still, it's a cheap and irritating plot. This is an odd book. The vampires (or vampyres, as the Count wants to use) think of themselves as modern and sophisticated, making a break from the past by attempting to overcome such traditional problems as burning up in the sunlight and fear of religious symbols and garlic. The Count has put his family through rigorous training and desensitization, deciding such traditional vulnerabilities are outdated things of the past. He has, however, kept the belief that vampires are at the top of a natural chain of being, humans are essentially cattle, and vampires naturally should rule and feed on the population. Lancre is an attractive new food source. Vampires also have mind control powers, control the weather, and can put their minds into magpies. They are, in short, enemies designed for Granny Weatherwax, the witch expert in headology. A shame that Granny is apparently off sulking. Nanny and Agnes may have to handle the vampires on their own, with the help of Magrat. One of the things that makes this book odd is that it seemed like Pratchett was setting up some character growth, giving Agnes a chance to shine, and giving Nanny Ogg a challenge that she didn't want. This sort of happens, but then nothing much comes of it. Most of the book is the vampires preening about how powerful they are and easily conquering Lancre, while everyone else flails ineffectively. Pratchett does pull together an ending with some nice set pieces, but that ending doesn't deliver on any of the changes or developments it felt like the story was setting up. We do get a lot of Granny, along with an amusingly earnest priest of Om (lots of references to Small Gods here, while firmly establishing it as long-ago history). Granny is one of my favorite Discworld characters, so I don't mind that, but we've seen Granny solve a lot of problems before. I wanted to see more of Agnes, who is the interesting new character and whose dynamic with her inner voice feels like it has a great deal of unrealized potential. There is a sharp and condensed version of comparative religion from Granny, which is probably the strongest part of the book and includes one of those Discworld quotes that has been widely repeated out of context:
"And sin, young man, is when you treat people as things. Including yourself. That's what sin is." "It's a lot more complicated than that " "No. It ain't. When people say things are a lot more complicated than that, they means they're getting worried that they won t like the truth. People as things, that's where it starts."
This loses a bit in context because this book is literally about treating people as things, and thus the observation feels more obvious when it arrives in this book than when you encounter it on its own, but it's still a great quote. Sadly, I found a lot of this book annoying. One of those annoyances is a pet peeve that others may or may not share: I have very little patience for dialogue in phonetically-spelled dialect, and there are two substantial cases of that here. One is a servant named Igor who speaks with an affected lisp represented by replacing every ess sound with th, resulting in lots of this:
"No, my Uncle Igor thtill workth for him. Been thtruck by lightning three hundred timeth and thtill putth in a full night'th work."
I like Igor as a character (he's essentially a refugee from The Addams Family, which adds a good counterpoint to the malicious and arrogant evil of the vampires), but my brain stumbles over words like "thtill" every time. It's not that I can't decipher it; it's that the deciphering breaks the flow of reading in a way that I found not at all fun. It bugged me enough that I started skipping his lines if I couldn't work them out right away. The other example is the Nac Mac Feegles, who are... well, in the book, they're Pictsies and a type of fairy, but they're Scottish Smurfs, right down to only having one female (at least in this book). They're entertainingly homicidal, but they all talk like this:
"Ach, hins tak yar scaggie, yer dank yowl callyake!"
I'm from the US and bad with accents and even worse with accents reproduced in weird spellings, and I'm afraid that I found 95% of everything said by Nac Mac Feegles completely incomprehensible to the point where I gave up even trying to read it. (I'm now rather worried about the Tiffany Aching books and am hoping Pratchett toned the dialect down a lot, because I'm not sure I can deal with more of this.) But even apart from the dialect, I thought something was off about the plot structure of this book. There's a lot of focus on characters who don't seem to contribute much to the plot resolution. I wanted more of the varied strengths of Lancre coming together, rather than the focus on Granny. And the vampires are absurdly powerful, unflappable, smarmy, and contemptuous of everyone, which makes for threatening villains but also means spending a lot of narrative time with a Discworld version of Jacob Rees-Mogg. I feel like there's enough of that in the news already. Also, while I will avoid saying too much about the plot, I get very suspicious when older forms of oppression are presented as good alternatives to modernizing, rationalist spins on exploitation. I see what Pratchett was trying to do, and there is an interesting point here about everyone having personal relationships and knowing their roles (a long-standing theme of the Lancre Discworld stories). But I think the reason why there is some nostalgia for older autocracy is that we only hear about it from stories, and the process of storytelling often creates emotional distance and a patina of adventure and happy outcomes. Maybe you can make an argument that classic British imperialism is superior to smug neoliberalism, but both of them are quite bad and I don't want either of them. On a similar note, Nanny Ogg's tyranny over her entire extended clan continues to be played for laughs, but it's rather unappealing and seems more abusive the more one thinks about it. I realize the witches are not intended to be wholly good or uncomplicated moral figures, but I want to like Nanny, and Pratchett seems to be writing her as likable, even though she has an astonishing lack of respect for all the people she's related to. One might even say that she treats them like things. There are some great bits in this book, and I suspect there are many people who liked it more than I did. I wouldn't be surprised if it was someone's favorite Discworld novel. But there were enough bits that didn't work for me that I thought it averaged out to a middle-of-the-road entry. Followed by The Fifth Elephant in publication order. This is the last regular witches novel, but some of the thematic thread is picked up by The Wee Free Men, the first Tiffany Aching novel. Rating: 7 out of 10

2 November 2022

Robert McQueen: Many thanks & good luck to Neil McGovern

As President of the GNOME Foundation, I wanted to post a quick note to pass on the thanks from the Board, the Foundation staff team and membership to our outgoing Executive Director, Neil McGovern. I had the pleasure of passing on GNOME s thanks in person at the Casa Bariachi this summer at GUADEC in Guadelajara, at the most exellent mariachi celebration of GNOME s 25th Anniversary.  Kindly they stopped the music and handed me the microphone for the whole place, although I think many of the other guests celebrating their own birthdays were less excited about Neil s tenure as Executive Director and the Free and Open Source desktop in general.

Neil s 6-month handover period came to an end last month and he handed over the reins to myself and Thibault Martin on the Executive Committee, and Director of Operations Rosanna Yuen has stepped up to act as Chief of Staff and interface between the Board and the staff team for the time being. Our recruitment is ongoing for a new Executive Director although the search is a little behind schedule (mostly down to me!), and we re hugely grateful to a few volunteers who have joined our search committee to help us source, screen and interview applicants.

I have really enjoyed working closely with Neil in my time on the GNOME board, and we are hugely grateful for his contributions and achievements over the past 5 years which I posted about earlier in the year. Neil is this month starting a new role as the Executive Director of Ruby Central. Our very best wishes from the GNOME community and good luck with your new role. See you soon! (also posted to Discourse if you wish to add any thanks or comments of your own)

1 November 2022

Paul Tagliamonte: Decoding LDPC: k-Bit Brute Forcing

Before you go on: I've been warned off implementing this in practice on a few counts; namely, the space tradeoff isn't worth it, and it's unlikely to correct meaningful errors. I'm going to leave this post up, but please do take the content with a very large grain of salt!
My initial efforts to build a PHY and Data Link layer from scratch using my own code have been progressing nicely since the initial BPSK based protocol I ve documented under the PACKRAT series. As part of that, I ve been diving deep into FEC, and in particular, LDPC. I won t be able to do an overview of LDPC justice in this post with any luck that ll come in a later post to come as part of the RATPACK series, so some knowledge is assumed. As such this post is less useful for those looking to learn about LDPC, and a bit more targeted to those who enjoy talking and thinking about FEC.
Hey, heads up! - This post contains extremely unvalidated and back of the napkin quality work without any effort to prove this out generally. Hopefully this work can be of help to others, but please double check anything below if you need it for your own work!
While implementing LDPC, I ve gotten an encoder and checker working, enough to use LDPC like a checksum. The next big step is to write a Decoder, which can do error correction. The two popular approaches for the actual correction that I ve seen while reading about LDPC are Belief Propagation, and some class of linear programming that I haven t dug into yet. I m not thrilled at how expensive this all is in software, so while implementing the stack I ve been exploring every shady side ally to try and learn more about how encoders and decoders work, both in theory - and in practice.

Processing an LDPC Message Checking if a message is correct is fairly straightforward with LDPC (as with encoding, I ll note). As a quick refresher given the LDPC H (check) matrix of width N, you can check your message vector (msg) of length N by multipling H and msg, and checking if the output vector is all zero.
 // scheme contains our G (generator) and
 // H (check) matrices.
 scheme :=  G: Matrix ... , H: Matrix ... 
// msg contains our LDPC message (data and
 // check bits).
 msg := Vector ... 
// N is also the length of the encoded
 // msg vector after check bits have been
 // added.
 N := scheme.G.Width
// Now, let's generate our 'check' vector.
 ch := Multiply(scheme.H, msg)
We can now see if the message is correct or not:
 // if the ch vector is all zeros, we know
 // that the message is valid, and we don't
 // need to do anything.
 if ch.IsZero()  
// handle the case where the message
 // is fine as-is.
 return ...
 
// Expensive decode here
This is great for getting a thumbs up / thumbs down on the message being correct, but correcting errors still requires pulling the LDPC matrix values from the g (generator) matrix out, building a bipartite graph, and iteratively reprocessing the bit values, until constraints are satisfied and the message has been corrected. This got me thinking - what is the output vector when it s not all zeros? Since 1 values in the output vector indicates consistency problems in the message bits as they relate to the check bits, I wondered if this could be used to speed up my LDPC decoder. It appears to work, so this post is half an attempt to document this technique before I put it in my hot path, and half a plea for those who do like to talk about FEC to tell me what name this technique actually is.

k-Bit Brute Forcing Given that the output Vector s non-zero bit pattern is set due to the position of errors in the message vector, let s use that fact to build up a table of k-Bit errors that we can index into.
 // for clarity's sake, the Vector
 // type is being used as the lookup
 // key here, even though it may
 // need to be a hash or string in
 // some cases.
 idx := map[Vector]int 
for i := 0; i < N; i++  
// Create a vector of length N
 v := Vector 
v.FlipBit(i)
// Now, let's use the generator matrix to encode
 // the data with checksums, and then use the
 // check matrix on the message to figure out what
 // bit pattern results
 ev := Multiply(scheme.H, Multiply(v, scheme.G))
idx[ev] = i
 
This can be extended to multiple bits (hence: k-Bits), but I ve only done one here for illustration. Now that we have our idx mapping, we can now go back to the hot path on Checking the incoming message data:
 // if the ch vector is all zeros, we know
 // that the message is valid, and we don't
 // need to do anything.
 if ch.IsZero()  
// handle the case where the message
 // is fine as-is.
 return ...
 
errIdx, ok := idx[ch]
if ok  
msg.FlipBit(errIdx)
// Verify the LDPC message using
 // H again here.
 return ...
 
// Expensive decode here
Since map lookups wind up a heck of a lot faster than message-passing bit state, the hope here is this will short-circuit easy to solve errors for k-Bits, for some value of k that the system memory can tolerate.

Does this work? Frankly I have no idea. I ve written a small program and brute forced single-bit errors in all bit positions using random data to start with, and I ve not been able to find any collisions in the 1-bit error set, using the LDPC matrix from 802.3an-2006. Even if I was to find a collision for a higher-order k-Bit value, I m tempted to continue with this approach, and treat each set of bits in the Vector s bin (like a hash-table), checking the LDPC validity after each bit set in the bin. As long as the collision rate is small enough, it should be possible to correct k-Bits of error faster than the more expensive Belief Propagation approach. That being said, I m not entirely convinced collisions will be very common, but it ll take a bit more time working through the math to say that with any confidence. Have you seen this approach called something official in publications? See an obvious flaw in the system? Send me a tip, please!

Russ Allbery: Review: What Makes This Book So Great

Review: What Makes This Book So Great, by Jo Walton
Publisher: Tor
Copyright: January 2014
ISBN: 0-7653-3193-4
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 447
Jo Walton, in addition to being an excellent science fiction and fantasy writer, is a prodigious reader and frequent participant in on-line SFF book discussion going back to the Usenet days. This book is a collection of short essays previously published on Tor.com between July 2008 and February 2011. The unifying theme is that Walton regularly re-reads her favorite books, and each essay (apart from some general essays on related topics) is about why this specific book is one that she re-reads, and (as the title says) what makes it so great. Searching for the title of one of the essays turns it up on Tor.com still, so this is one of those collections that you don't have to buy since you can read its contents on-line for free. That said, it looks like these essays were from before Tor.com started classifying posts into series, so it's going to be challenging to track them down in the huge number of other articles Walton has written for the site. (That said, you can't go far wrong by reading any of her essays at random.) I read these essays as they were originally published, so this was also a re-read for me, but it had been a while. I'm happy to report that they were just as much fun the second time. In the introduction and in the final essay of this collection, Walton draws a distinction between what she's doing, criticism, and reviewing. As someone else who writes about books (in a far more amateur fashion), I liked this distinction. The way I'd characterize it is that criticism is primarily about the work: taking it apart to see what makes it tick, looking for symbolism and hidden meanings, and comparing and contrasting other works that are tackling similar themes. I've often finished a work of criticism and still had no idea if the author enjoyed reading the work being criticized or not, since that isn't the point. Reviewing is assistance to consumers and focuses more on the reader: would you enjoy this book? Is it enjoyable to read? Does it say something new? What genre and style is it in, so that you can match that to your tastes? Talking about books is neither of those things, although it's a bit closer to reviewing. But the emphasis is on one's personal enjoyment instead of attempting to review a product for others. When I talk about books with friends, I talk primarily about what bits I liked, what bits I didn't like, where the emotional beats were for me, and what interesting things the book did that surprised me or caught my attention. One can find a review in there, and sometimes even criticism, but the focus and the formality is different. (And, to be honest, my reviews are more on the "talking about the book" side than fully proper reviews.) These essays are indeed talking about books. They're all re-reads; in some cases the first re-read, but more frequently the latest of many re-reads. There are lots of spoilers, which makes for bad reviews (the target audience of a review hasn't read the book yet) but good fodder for conversations about books. (The spoilers are mostly marked, but if you're particularly averse to spoilers, you'll need to read carefully.) Most of the essays are about a single book, but there are a few on more general topics, such as Walton's bafflement that anyone would skim a novel. Since these are re-reads, and the essays collected here are more than a decade old, the focus is on older books. Some of them are famous: Vinge's A Fire Upon the Deep and A Deepness in the Sky, early Le Guin, Samuel Delaney's SF novels, Salmon Rushdie's Midnight's Children. Some of them are more obscure. C.J. Cherryh, for example, is a writer who never seems to get much on-line attention, but who is one of Walton's favorites. Most of the essays stand alone or come in small clusters about a writer, often sprinkled through the book instead of clumped together. (The book publishes the essays in the same order they originally appeared on Tor.com.) The two largest groups of essays are re-readings of every book in Steven Brust's Vlad Taltos universe (including Brokedown Palace and the Paarfi books) up to Jhegaala, and every book in Lois McMaster Bujold's Miles Vorkosigan series up to Diplomatic Immunity. This is fitting: those are two of the great series of science fiction, but don't seem to be written about nearly as much as I would expect. There are over 130 essays in a 447 page book, so there's a lot of material here and none of them outlive their welcome. Walton has a comfortable, approachable style that bubbles with delight and appreciation for books. I think it's impossible to read this collection without wanting to read more, and without adding several more books to the ever-teetering to-read pile. This is perhaps not the best source of reading recommendations if you dislike spoilers, although it can be used for that if you read carefully. But if you love listening to conversations about the genre and talking about how books bounce off each other, and particularly if you have read most of these books already or don't mind spoilers, this collection is a delight. If you're the type of SFF reader who likes reading the reviews in Locus or is already reading Tor.com, highly recommended. Rating: 8 out of 10

31 October 2022

Scarlett Gately Moore: KDE Gear Snaps fixes and new releases

Another continuation of https://www.scarlettgatelymoore.dev/kde-gear-snaps-round-3 ! This week I solved a few more problems. sudo snap install hunspell-dictionaries sudo snap connect lokalize:hunspell-dictionaries-plug hunspell-dictionaries:hunspell-dictionaries
Kdenlive with Glaximate animations!
More coming tomorrow! Please consider donating! Helps keep the lights on so I can get more Kool software out to you. https://www.patreon.com/sgmoore Cash App $ScarlettMoore0903 Stripe: https://buy.stripe.com/28o16y3PHcISfaE8ww

29 October 2022

Dirk Eddelbuettel: littler 0.3.17 on CRAN: Maintenance

max-heap image The eighteenth release of littler as a CRAN package just landed, following in the now sixteen year history (!!) as a package started by Jeff in 2006, and joined by me a few weeks later. littler is the first command-line interface for R as it predates Rscript. It allows for piping as well for shebang scripting via #!, uses command-line arguments more consistently and still starts faster. It also always loaded the methods package which Rscript only started to do in recent years. littler lives on Linux and Unix, has its difficulties on macOS due to yet-another-braindeadedness there (who ever thought case-insensitive filesystems as a default were a good idea?) and simply does not exist on Windows (yet the build system could be extended see RInside for an existence proof, and volunteers are welcome!). See the FAQ vignette on how to add it to your PATH. A few examples are highlighted at the Github repo, as well as in the examples vignette. This release, coming just a few weeks since the last release in August, heeds to clang-15 a updates one signature to a proper interface. It also contains one kindly contributed patch updating install2.r (and installBioc.r) to cope with a change in R-devel. The full change description follows.

Changes in littler version 0.3.17 (2022-10-29)
  • Changes in package
    • An internal function prototype was updated for clang-15.
  • Changes in examples
    • The install2.r and installBioc. were updated for an update in R-devel (Tatsuya Shima and Dirk in #104).

My CRANberries service provides a comparison to the previous release. Full details for the littler release are provided as usual at the ChangeLog page, and also on the package docs website. The code is available via the GitHub repo, from tarballs and now of course also from its CRAN page and via install.packages("littler"). Binary packages are available directly in Debian as well as soon via Ubuntu binaries at CRAN thanks to the tireless Michael Rutter. Comments and suggestions are welcome at the GitHub repo. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

Russ Allbery: California general election

As usual with these every-two-year posts, probably of direct interest only to California residents. Maybe the more obscure things we're voting on will be a minor curiosity to people elsewhere. Apologies to Planet Debian readers for the explicitly political post because I'm too lazy to change my blog software to do more fine-grained post classification. For what it's worth, most of the discussion here will be about the more fiddly and nuanced things we vote on, not on the major hot-button proposition. As in 2020, I'm only going to cover the ballot propositions, as all of the state-wide and most of the district races are both obvious to me and boring to talk about. The hyperlocal races are more interesting this year, but the number of people who would care and who are also reading this blog is essentially nonexistent, so I won't bother writing them up. This year, everything except Proposition 1 is an initiative (not put on the ballot by the legislature), which means I default to voting against them because they're usually poorly-written. Proposition 1: YES. Adds reproductive rights to the California state constitution. I'm fairly sure everyone reading this has already made up their mind on this topic and certainly nothing will ever change my mind, so I'll leave it at that. Proposition 26: YES. This mushes two different things together in an unhelpful way: allowing sports betting at some racetracks, and allowing a wider variety of gambling on tribal lands. I have no strong opinion about the former (I'll get into that more with the next proposition). For the latter, my starting point is that Native American tribes are and should be treated like independent governments with their own laws (which is what we promised them by treaty and then have systematically and maliciously betrayed ever since). I am not a citizen of any of the tribes and therefore fundamentally I should not get a say on this. I'm not a big fan of gambling or of the companies they're likely to hire to run casinos, but it should be their land and their decision. Proposition 27: NO. This, on the other hand, is about on-line sports betting outside of tribal lands, and looks to be a lot more about corruption and corporate greed. I am fairly dubious that outlawing gambling in general is that good of an idea. I think the harms are overstated given the existence of even wilder forms of gambling (crypto and financial derivatives) that are perfectly legal, and I'm always suspicious of attempting to solve social problems with police and prohibition systems. If there were a ballot proposition to simply legalize gambling in California, I'd have to think hard about that. But this is not that. This requires companies that want to offer on-line gambling to pay substantial up-front costs (which will restrict this to only huge gambling companies). In return, they are allowed entry into what is essentially a state-constructed partial monopoly. As usual, there's a typical vice tax deal attached where those companies are taxed to fund some program (in this case, homeless services and mental health treatment), but these sorts of taxes tend to be regressive in effect. We could just tax richer people like me to pay for those services instead. I'm also dubious that the money for homelessness will be used to build housing, which is what we need to do to address the problem. Proposition 28: YES. Sets aside money for art and music funding in public and charter schools. This is a reluctant yes because this sort of law should not be done via proposition; it should be done through a normal legislative process that balances all of the priorities for school funding. But despite the broken process by which this was put forward, it seems like a reasonable law and no one is opposing it, so okay, fine. Proposition 29: NO. The attempt to force all dialysis clinics to have licensed doctors on site is back again. Everything about the way dialysis health care is provided in California makes me angry. We should have a state health care system similar to the NHS. We should open dialysis clinics based on the number of people requiring dialysis in that area. Every one of them should be unionized. We absolutely should not allow for-profit companies to have primary responsibility for basic life-saving medical care like dialysis. But this proposition does not solve any of those problems, and what it claims to do is false. It claims that by setting credential requirements on who has to be on-site at a dialysis clinic, the clinics will become safer. This is simply not true, for all of the reasons discussed in Still Not Safe. This is not how safety works. The safest person to do dialysis is someone with extensive experience in performing dialysis, who has seen all the problems and has an intuition for what to watch out for. That has less to do with credentials than with good training specifically in dialysis, apprenticeship, and practice, not to mention reasonable hours and good pay so that the workers are not stressed. Do I think the private dialysis clinics are likely doing a good job with this? Hah. (Do I think dialysis clinics run by large medical non-profits would do a good job with this? Also hah.) But this would enshrine into law a fundamentally incorrect solution to the problem that makes dialysis more expensive without addressing any of the other problems with the system. It's the same tactic that was used on abortion clinics, with the same bogus argument that having people with specific credentials on-site would make them safer. It was false then and it's still false now. I would agree with better regulation of dialysis clinics, but this specific regulation is entirely wrong-headed. Also, while this isn't an overriding factor, I get annoyed when the same proposition shows up again without substantial changes. For matters of fundamental rights, okay, sure. But for technical regulation fixes like this one, the proponents should consider taking no for an answer and trying a different approach. Like going to the legislature, which is where this kind of regulation should be designed anyway. Proposition 30: YES. Raises taxes on the personal income of extremely rich Californians (over $2 million in income in one year) to fund various climate change mitigation programs. This is another reluctant yes vote, because once again this shouldn't be done by initiative and should be written properly by the legislature. I also don't like restricting tax revenue to particular programs, which reduce budget flexibilty to no real purpose. It's not important to me that these revenues go to these specific programs, although the programs seem like good ones to fund. But the reality remains that wealthy Silicon Valley executives are undertaxed and the only way we can ever manage to raise taxes is through voting for things like this, so fine. Proposition 31: NO. The Calfornia legislature banned the sale of flavored vape products. If NO beats YES on this proposition, that ban will be overturned. Drug prohibition has never, ever worked, and yet we keep trying it over and over again in the hope that this time we'll get a different outcome. As usual, the pitch in favor of this is all about the children, specifically the claim that flavored tobacco products are only about increasing their appeal to kids because... kids like candy? Or something? I am extremely dubious of this argument; it's obvious to me from walking around city streets that adults prefer the flavored products as well and sale to kids is already prohibited and unchanged by this proposition. I don't like vaping. I wish people would stop, at least around me, because the scent is obnoxious and the flavored stuff is even more obnoxious, even apart from whatever health problems it causes. But I'm never going to vote for drug prohibition because drug prohibition doesn't work. It just creates a black market and organized crime and makes society overall worse. Yes, the tobacco companies are some of the worst corporations on the planet, and I hope they get sued into oblivion (and ideally prosecuted) for all the lying they do, but I'm still not going to vote for prohibition. Even the best kind of prohibition that only outlaws sale and not possession. Also, secondarily but still significant, bans like this just frustrate a bunch of people and burn good will and political capital, which we should be trying to preserve to tackle far more important problems. The politics of outlawing people's pleasures for their own good are not great. We have a lot of serious problems to deal with; maybe let's not pick fights we don't have to.

28 October 2022

Antoine Beaupr : Debating VPN options

In my home lab(s), I have a handful of machines spread around a few points of presence, with mostly residential/commercial cable/DSL uplinks, which means, generally, NAT. This makes monitoring those devices kind of impossible. While I do punch holes for SSH, using jump hosts gets old quick, so I'm considering adding a virtual private network (a "VPN", not a VPN service) so that all machines can be reachable from everywhere. I see three ways this can work:
  1. a home-made Wireguard VPN, deployed with Puppet
  2. a Wireguard VPN overlay, with Tailscale or equivalent
  3. IPv6, native or with tunnels
So which one will it be?

Wireguard Puppet modules As is (unfortunately) typical with Puppet, I found multiple different modules to talk with Wireguard.
module score downloads release stars watch forks license docs contrib issue PR notes
halyard 3.1 1,807 2022-10-14 0 0 0 MIT no requires firewall and Configvault_Write modules?
voxpupuli 5.0 4,201 2022-10-01 2 23 7 AGPLv3 good 1/9 1/4 1/61 optionnally configures ferm, uses systemd-networkd, recommends systemd module with manage_systemd to true, purges unknown keys
abaranov 4.7 17,017 2021-08-20 9 3 38 MIT okay 1/17 4/7 4/28 requires pre-generated private keys
arrnorets 3.1 16,646 2020-12-28 1 2 1 Apache-2 okay 1 0 0 requires pre-generated private keys?
The voxpupuli module seems to be the most promising. The abaranov module is more popular and has more contributors, but it has more open issues and PRs. More critically, the voxpupuli module was written after the abaranov author didn't respond to a PR from the voxpupuli author trying to add more automation (namely private key management). It looks like setting up a wireguard network would be as simple as this on node A:
wireguard::interface   'wg0':
  source_addresses => ['2003:4f8:c17:4cf::1', '149.9.255.4'],
  public_key       => $facts['wireguard_pubkeys']['nodeB'],
  endpoint         => 'nodeB.example.com:53668',
  addresses        => [ 'Address' => '192.168.123.6/30', , 'Address' => 'fe80::beef:1/64' ,],
 
This configuration come from this pull request I sent to the module to document how to use that fact. Note that the addresses used here are examples that shouldn't be reused and do not confirm to RFC5737 ("IPv4 Address Blocks Reserved for Documentation", 192.0.2.0/24 (TEST-NET-1), 198.51.100.0/24 (TEST-NET-2), and 203.0.113.0/24 (TEST-NET-3)) or RFC3849 ("IPv6 Address Prefix Reserved for Documentation", 2001:DB8::/32), but that's another story. (To avoid boostrapping problems, the resubmit-facts configuration could be used so that other nodes facts are more immediately available.) One problem with the above approach is that you explicitly need to take care of routing, network topology, and addressing. This can get complicated quickly, especially if you have lots of devices, behind NAT, in multiple locations (which is basically my life at home, unfortunately). Concretely, basic Wireguard only support one peer behind NAT. There are some workarounds for this, but they generally imply a relay server of some sort, or some custom registry, it's kind of a mess. And this is where overlay networks like Tailscale come in.

Tailscale Tailscale is basically designed to deal with this problem. It's not fully opensource, but pretty close, and they have an interesting philosophy behind that. The client is opensource, and there is an opensource version of the server side, called headscale. They have recently (late 2022) hired the main headscale developer while promising to keep supporting it, which is pretty amazing. Tailscale provides an overlay network based on Wireguard, where each peer basically has a peer-to-peer encrypted connexion, with automatic key rotation. They also ship a multitude of applications and features on top of that like file sharing, keyless SSH access, and so on. The authentication layer is based on an existing SSO provider, you don't just register with Tailscale with new account, you login with Google, Microsoft, or GitHub (which, really, is still Microsoft). The Headscale server ships with many features out of that:
  • Full "base" support of Tailscale's features
  • Configurable DNS
    • Split DNS
    • MagicDNS (each user gets a name)
  • Node registration
    • Single-Sign-On (via Open ID Connect)
    • Pre authenticated key
  • Taildrop (File Sharing)
  • Access control lists
  • Support for multiple IP ranges in the tailnet
  • Dual stack (IPv4 and IPv6)
  • Routing advertising (including exit nodes)
  • Ephemeral nodes
  • Embedded DERP server (AKA NAT-to-NAT traversal)
Neither project (client or server) is in Debian (RFP 972439 for the client, none filed yet for the server), which makes deploying this for my use case rather problematic. Their install instructions are basically a curl bash but they also provide packages for various platforms. Their Debian install instructions are surprisingly good, and check most of the third party checklist we're trying to establish. (It's missing a pin.) There's also a Puppet module for tailscale, naturally. What I find a little disturbing with Tailscale is that you not only need to trust Tailscale with authorizing your devices, you also basically delegate that trust also to the SSO provider. So, in my case, GitHub (or anyone who compromises my account there) can penetrate the VPN. A little scary. Tailscale is also kind of an "all or nothing" thing. They have MagicDNS, file transfers, all sorts of things, but those things require you to hook up your resolver with Tailscale. In fact, Tailscale kind of assumes you will use their nameservers, and have suffered great lengths to figure out how to do that. And naturally, here, it doesn't seem to work reliably; my resolv.conf somehow gets replaced and the magic resolution of the ts.net domain fails. (I wonder why we can't opt in to just publicly resolve the ts.net domain. I don't care if someone can enumerate the private IP addreses or machines in use in my VPN, at least I don't care as much as fighting with resolv.conf everywhere.) Because I mostly have access to the routers on the networks I'm on, I don't think I'll be using tailscale in the long term. But it's pretty impressive stuff: in the time it took me to even review the Puppet modules to configure Wireguard (which is what I'll probably end up doing), I was up and running with Tailscale (but with a broken DNS, naturally). (And yes, basic Wireguard won't bring me DNS either, but at least I won't have to trust Tailscale's Debian packages, and Tailscale, and Microsoft, and GitHub with this thing.)

IPv6 IPv6 is actually what is supposed to solve this. Not NAT port forwarding crap, just real IPs everywhere. The problem is: even though IPv6 adoption is still growing, it's kind of reaching a plateau at around 40% world-wide, with Canada lagging behind at 34%. It doesn't help that major ISPs in Canada (e.g. Bell Canada, Videotron) don't care at all about IPv6 (e.g. Videotron in beta since 2011). So we can't rely on those companies to do the right thing here. The typical solution here is often to use a tunnel like HE's tunnelbroker.net. It's kind of tricky to configure, but once it's done, it works. You get end-to-end connectivity as long as everyone on the network is on IPv6. And that's really where the problem lies here; the second one of your nodes can't setup such a tunnel, you're kind of stuck and that tool completely breaks down. IPv6 tunnels also don't give you the kind of security a VPN provides as well, naturally. The other downside of a tunnel is you don't really get peer-to-peer connectivity: you go through the tunnel. So you can expect higher latencies and possibly lower bandwidth as well. Also, HE.net doesn't currently charge for this service (and they've been doing this for a long time), but this could change in the future (just like Tailscale, that said). Concretely, the latency difference is rather minimal, Google:
--- ipv6.l.google.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0,00% packet loss, time 136,8ms
RTT[ms]: min = 13, median = 14, p(90) = 14, max = 15
--- google.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0,00% packet loss, time 136,0ms
RTT[ms]: min = 13, median = 13, p(90) = 14, max = 14
In the case of GitHub, latency is actually lower, interestingly:
--- ipv6.github.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0,00% packet loss, time 134,6ms
RTT[ms]: min = 13, median = 13, p(90) = 14, max = 14
--- github.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0,00% packet loss, time 293,1ms
RTT[ms]: min = 29, median = 29, p(90) = 29, max = 30
That is because HE.net peers directly with my ISP and Fastly (which is behind GitHub.com's IPv6, apparently?), so it's only 6 hops away. While over IPv4, the ping goes over New York, before landing AWS's Ashburn, Virginia datacenters, for a whopping 13 hops... I managed setup a HE.net tunnel at home, because I also need IPv6 for other reasons (namely debugging at work). My first attempt at setting this up in the office failed, but now that I found the openwrt.org guide, it worked... for a while, and I was able to produce the above, encouraging, mini benchmarks. Unfortunately, a few minutes later, IPv6 just went down again. And the problem with that is that many programs (and especially OpenSSH) do not respect the Happy Eyeballs protocol (RFC 8305), which means various mysterious "hangs" at random times on random applications. It's kind of a terrible user experience, on top of breaking the one thing it's supposed to do, of course, which is to give me transparent access to all the nodes I maintain. Even worse, it would still be a problem for other remote nodes I might setup where I might not have acess to the router to setup the tunnel. It's also not absolutely clear what happens if you setup the same tunnel in two places... Presumably, something is smart enough to distribute only a part of the /48 block selectively, but I don't really feel like going that far, considering how flaky the setup is already.

Other options If this post sounds a little biased towards IPv6 and Wireguard, it's because it is. I would like everyone to migrate to IPv6 already, and Wireguard seems like a simple and sound system. I'm aware of many other options to make VPNs. So before anyone jumps in and says "but what about...", do know that I have personnally experimented with:
  • tinc: nice, automatic meshing, used for the Montreal mesh, serious design flaws in the crypto that make it generally unsafe to use; supposedly, v1.1 (or 2.0?) will fix this, but that's been promised for over a decade by now
  • ipsec, specifically strongswan: hard to configure (especially configure correctly!), harder even to debug, otherwise really nice because transparent (e.g. no need for special subnets), used at work, but also considering a replacement there because it's a major barrier to entry to train new staff
  • OpenVPN: mostly used as a client for [VPN service][]s like Riseup VPN or Mullvad, mostly relevant for client-server configurations, not really peer-to-peer, shared secrets or TLS, kind of an hassle to maintain, see also SoftEther for an alternative implementation
All of those solutions have significant problems and I do not wish to use any of those for this project. Also note that Tailscale is only one of many projects laid over Wireguard to do that kind of thing, see this LWN review for others (basically NetbBird, Firezone, and Netmaker).

Future work Those are options that came up after writing this post, and might warrant further examination in the future.
  • Meshbird, a "distributed private networking" with little information about how it actually works other than "encrypted with strong AES-256"
  • Nebula, "A scalable overlay networking tool with a focus on performance, simplicity and security", written by Slack people to replace IPsec, docs, runs as an overlay for Slack's 50k node network, only packaged in Debian experimental, lagging behind upstream (1.4.0, from May 2021 vs upstream's 1.6.1 from September 2022), requires a central CA, Golang, I'm in "wait and see" mode for now
  • n2n: "layer two VPN", seems packaged in Debian but inactive
  • ouroboros: "peer-to-peer packet network prototype", sounds and seems complicated
  • QuickTUN is interesting because it's just a small wrapper around NaCL, and it's in Debian... but maybe too obscure for my own good
  • unetd: Wireguard-based full mesh networking from OpenWRT, not in Debian
  • vpncloud: "high performance peer-to-peer mesh VPN over UDP supporting strong encryption, NAT traversal and a simple configuration", sounds interesting, not in Debian
  • Yggdrasil: actually a pretty good match for my use case, but I didn't think of it when starting the experiments here; packaged in Debian, with the Golang version planned, Puppet module; major caveat: nodes exposed publicly inside the global mesh unless configured otherwise (firewall suggested), requires port forwards, alpha status

Conclusion Right now, I'm going to deploy Wireguard tunnels with Puppet. It seems like kind of a pain in the back, but it's something I will be able to reuse for work, possibly completely replacing strongswan. I have another Puppet module for IPsec which I was planning to publish, but now I'm thinking I should just abort that and replace everything with Wireguard, assuming we still need VPNs at work in the future. (I have a number of reasons to believe we might not need any in the near future anyways...)

Next.

Previous.