John Goerzen: Review: The Economist
A few months ago, I asked for suggestions for magazines to subscribe to. I got a lot of helpful suggestions, and subscribed to three: The New Yorker, The Atlantic, and The Economist.
Today, I m reviewing the only one of the three that I m disappointed in, and it s The Economist. This comes as something of a surprise, because so many people (with the exception of Bryan O Sullivan) recommended it.
Let s start with a quote from the issue that found its way to my mailbox this week:
A crowd of 2m or more is making its way to Washington, DC, to witness the inauguration of Mr Obama. Billions more will watch it on television. [link]Every issue, I see this sort of thing all over. An estimate, or an opinion, presented as unquestioned fact, sometimes pretty clearly wrong or misleading. For weeks before Jan. 20, and even the day before, the widely-reported word from officials was that they had no idea what to expect, but if they had to guess, they d say that attendance would be between 1-2 million. In the end, the best estimates have placed attendance at 1.8 million. Would it have killed them to state that most estimates were more conservative, and to cite the source of their particular estimate? That s all I want, really, when they do things like this. I knew going into it that the magazine (to American eyes) essentially editorializes throughout, and I don t have a problem with that. But it engages in over-generalization far too often and that s just when I catch it. This was just a quick example from the first article I read in this issue; it s more blatant other places, but quite honestly I m too lazy to go look some more examples up at this hour. I do remember, though, them referring to members of Obama s cabinet as if they were certain to be, back before Obama had even announced their pick, let alone their confirmation hearings happening. One of my first issues of The Economist had a lengthy section on the global automobile market. I learned a lot about how western companies broke into markets in Asia and South America. Or at least I think I did. I don t know enough about that subject to catch them if they are over-generalizing again. The end result is that I read each issue with a mix of fascination and distrust; the topics are interesting, but I can never really tell if I m being given an accurate story. It often feels like the inside scoop, but then when I have some bit of knowledge of what the scoop is, it s often a much murkier shade of gray than The Economist s ever-confident prose lets on. Don t get me wrong; there are things about the Economist I like. But not as much as with the New Yorker or the Atlantic, so I ll let my subscription lapse after 6 months but keep reading it until then.
Some rather unfriendly software (Munin, lighttpd, etc.) require that IP ranges are specified using regexes instead of the usually more convenient 

The
One very convenient feature of Apple's hardware is the ability for their workstations to enter
The subscription will end on January the 25th, for people willing to come to this unique OCaml event, this is your last chance !!!!
We have 40 participants for now. I am quite happy with this number because it is almost the same as last year -- except that we do it in Grenoble rather than Paris. Anyway, I see that a lot of people who were there last year, will come back to this year events. There is also a few more people, in particular more from CAML consortium members.
I have stepped down from the first talk about
About 25KM from Amritsar is Tarn Taran. Tarn Taran was founded by the fifth Sikh Guru, Guru Arjun Dev who also built a Gurudwara there and named it after the town. The Gurudwara has the largest Sarovar (lake) among all the Sarovar's across all Gurudwaras. The place is calm, peaceful and a treat to the senses. I was there one winter morning and took some pictures.




For legacy reasons (it's still most used IM in Czechia), I still use
ICQ. Few days ago AOL again started to block some users (especially in
Russia) and disconnected time to time others using non official clients.
They do such things quite regularly, however the problems are usually
quite easy to fix once somebody figures out what exactly do they check.
So it just forces all clients to
Helped my parents moving the first half of the week. Left there at
Thurdays around 9am. Drove 45min to Zurich. Removed everything bicycle
related from my daypack. Left the TomTom at home. (Google Maps on the
E51 has to sufficed and sufficed so far.) Crammed cloths for three
days in.
Was at Zurich Main Station around 11:40am. My plan was to take the
direct ICE train from Zurich to Hamburg Dammtor. Bought a Rivella for
the journey.
First suprise at the platform: No ICE train. Instead a Swiss
InterCity. The staff told us due to a defect in the ICE train, we have
to go to Basel SBB with this train, then switch trains there. No
carriage numbers and reservations valid here. Hrmpf. For luck, there
where not that many people in the train. No power sockets though.
Next surprise at Basel SBB: No ICE train here either. We re advised to
switch to a German InterCity and then switch again a few kilometers
later at Basel Badischer Bahnhof (aka Basel, German Station ).
There then finally waited an ICE labelled as the initially expected
ICE 72 from Zurich to Hamburg Altona. Even the reservations were
displayed, departure was though 20min later than the original ICE 72.
The voice from the speakers told us that this is a replacement train
which came empty from Zurich. WTF? The next time the voice explained
the situation, it was a replacement train coming from Interlaken
Ok, DB is not as insane as I believed for about half an hour. ;-)
Worked though the git tutorial and the git glossary on the train since
in future I ll use git in some of the OSS project I m working together
with
