Search Results: "jam"

26 June 2007

Benjamin Mako Hill: Joining the FSF Board of Directors

When I was 12 years old, I discovered free software. That discovery changed my life and I've never recovered. Over what is now more than half of my life, I have looked to the Free Software Foundation for vision, guidance, and an example of a free world and I have rarely been disappointed. The list of directors of the FSF -- Richard Stallman, Eben Moglen, Lawrence Lessig, Henri Poole, Jerry Sussman, Hal Abelson, and Geoffrey Knauth -- doubles as a list of some of my greatest heroes and role models. As such, I lack the words to describe how it feels that, just yesterday, I was elected to the board of directors of the Free Software Foundation. With Moglen having stepped down I have staggeringly large shoes to fill. I'm more than a little intimidated. At 26 years old, I suspect that I'll be the youngest person on the board by quite a bit. This means I'll have to try and make up with hard work and passion what I lack in experience and wisdom. It's a challenge I look forward to. With free software becoming increasingly successful and widespread, we've already begun to see push back. I suspect that in the next years, we'll see much more. We reaching the dangerous part of the, "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" progression. I'll do what I can to defend freedom until we've won. In order to ensure that I have the time necessary, I'm going to be resigning from the board of Software Freedom International and will consider reducing and resigning some of my other commitments as well. If you want to support my work with the foundation, you can become an associate member.

25 June 2007

James Morrison: Bike Pictures

Here are the pictures I promised a while ago.




22 June 2007

Benjamin Mako Hill: Visions of Free Culture

At the Free Culture National Conference a few weeks ago, Kevin Driscoll initiated a project that I feel is hugely important: he's prompted the free culture community to state and share their vision. While I've talked a lot about definitions in the past, I probably should have been talking about goals or vision. Kevin has created an important opportunity for all free culture stakeholders to step back and imagine what the world will look like when we win. By doing so, we end up defining a set of implicit goals for our social movement and can then set to work on the hard part: figuring out how we get there. With thanks to Eben Moglen for much of the inspiration, here's mine:
People remembered that there is no scarcity in information goods except where they have created it. As evidence grew of the positive effects of free culture and the toll of information ownership, our communities decided that we were not well served by limits on the flow and development of knowledge. Accordingly, the gatekeepers and tax collectors for culture have withered away and were dismantled. We -- the consumers, creators, and re-creators -- have offered new, more ethical business models, have engaged in new methods of distribution, and have produced creative goods. Today, access to information is a simple matter of connecting someone to a network and a community: a technical problem that we know how to solve. Nobody pays for the "right" to hear music, read a book, watch a movie, or use a piece of software. Nobody is forced to choose between being a bad neighbor or friend and breaking copyright law. No artist, musician, or author sells a million copies of anything and no artist, musician, or author has a day job.
Now it's your turn. Eben Moglen tell us to not stop until we're free. Let's paint a picture of what that free world looks like. Most importantly, let's challenge ourselves to find ways to make it possible.

James Morrison: Liberal meme

I found the results at fight conservatives. In a popup, I got "You're so Liberal you didn't even take the test! Do you own a Prius?". Actually, I don't own a car at all :)

20 June 2007

David Moreno Garza: Edinburgh

So, yeah, I’m in Edinburgh right now. For those of you who have asked, here is a little track of my adventures in the previous days: After all, I had made it to DebConf7.

19 June 2007

Scott James Remnant: Automatix and Upgrading

It also seems that several of the dapper to edgy upgrade problems are caused by the use of Automatix; a tool to perform common customisations to Ubuntu, such as replace the pre-installed software with alternatives and install packages that Ubuntu is unable to pre-install due to patent or other legal issues. Henrink has a few good points about this, however I feel that it’s also important to remember that the Ubuntu community does not only consist of the core developers. Automatix, and its like, are by their very definition, tools to reduce the amount of your system that the core developers will support. The default set of installed packages is not arbitrary, and one may be selected over your preferred solution simply because we do not have the expertise in the team to deal with the other, or even because the other is not supported upstream! We therefore rely on the wider community to take ownership of these packages, and support them within the community structure. Support, in the development sense, doesn’t just consist of security updates either; it also consists of keeping the software up to date, fixing bugs, and most importantly of all; testing it before we release. The right approach to making sure that Automatix users are not bitten again during the edgy to feisty upgrade in 6 months time is for members of the community to come together and form a team to support it. The existing Automatix team in Launchpad is probably a good start. One of the goals of this team should be to make sure that throughout feisty’s development cycle, upgrading from an edgy box with Automatix installed works flawlessly. Where it doesn’t, they should take effort to ensure that useful bugs are filed (e.g. “foo 1.1-2 contains same file as bar 1.0-1 but neither Replaces nor Conflicts it”) so that the problems can be fixed. Likewise where community members suggest that a user install software from outside the main component, or even outside the Ubuntu repository entirely, they should keep in mind that they’re likely to cause that user problems when it’s time for upgrade. If you’re running a repository of your own right now, have you considered that you need to start testing upgrades from edgy with your packages installed to feisty? Testing when feisty releases is too late!

Scott James Remnant: The Edgy Dance

Last week, a few of us gathered at Canonical’s London offices to oversee the final release preparations. This basically consists of testing the various candidate CD images and performing both install and upgrade tests on them. As you can imagine, three people performing repeated tests of edgy means that the fabled startup sound got many, many playings. A tradition started. Now, whenever you hear that sound, remember to get up and dance, wave your arms in the air or just tap your fingers on the table.

Scott James Remnant: What we'll get in feisty

This post is a sequel to my “What I want in edgy+1” post, which was written when the developer summit was first announced. Now that the summit (and the following company All Hands meeting) is over, and we’re all back home, this seems as good a time as any to review what was discussed and get a good idea of what feisty might look like. I’ve touched on the problem of predicting time-based releases before. It’s both the gift and the curse of a time-based release schedule that work not completed in time can be deferred to a later release. So take the following with a pinch of salt, some of this may still not make it. General Themes The general theme of dapper was to be a release that could be supported for a long term, conservatism was the goal. We did do some quite exciting work under the hood, such as the switch away from hotplug to a fully udev based system, but in general it wasn’t innovative or ground-breaking. Edgy was intended to be more ground-breaking, but the practical matter of having only a few months to develop it and our own pride in shipping something that still worked meant that it turned out as a shinier, improved dapper. So what’s feisty going to be like? Judging from the discussions at UDS, and the specifications that have been written, the general theme of feisty is to lead the way again with new technologies. The Desktop For the users, perhaps the most obvious change will be the active use of 3D acceleration to draw the desktop where hardware can support it (the issue of binary drivers has not yet been resolved). Windows are more visually distinct from each other through shadows behind them, and transparency for the non-active windows. The relationship between different workspaces/viewports is much clearer as the transition is animated on a cube or sliding pane. And for the bling crowd, window s can wobble, burn, explode or dissolve. There are two different compositors being considered at this point, compiz and beryl; we’re likely to decide which to use at Feature Freeze based on how well they’ve been fixed, developed and supported until that point. Underneath the hood, the configuration of the X server will be simpler and more robust; so even the worst case will not leave you confined to a console without any help. Networking Networking in feisty should be a much more pleasurable experience. The Network Manager project, which has been waiting on the side lines for a couple of releases, may finally get a shot at being in the default installation. For the average user, this makes switching between wired and wireless networks, including setting up WEP and WPA much, much easier. And what if there’s no network infrastructure around? Out of the box support for RFC 3927 link-local networks, and multi-cast DNS resolution (aka. Zeroconf), means that you just need to agree on a network name with others around you to be able to communicate. Of course, once you’re on a network, you still need to be able to share files and access local services. The integration of the Avahi project gives you one-click access to other people’s shared music or files; and lets you share your own, should you choose to do so. Customisations One of the most encountered problems with edgy was it being difficult to install various common packages that aren’t part of the default installation, especially codecs. Projects such as Automatix attempt to tackle this, but can cause problems with upgrading to later releases. Some effort will be going into feisty to make performing these common customisations much simpler, including being able to install codecs or viewers by just trying to open the file. Boot Sequence A long-running project within Ubuntu has been to get the boot and shutdown sequences as fast and efficient as possible. At the time we started, it was common for a Linux distribution to boot in a mere two or three minutes. If you thought edgy booted fast, wait until you see feisty. Feisty is the release where we take full advantage of Upstart, not only bringing the system up as fast as possible but also more robustly than we can do today. And if that weren’t enough, it should look slicker too; without some of the nasty flickering and mode changes that happen today.

Scott James Remnant: Slippery Slopes

One of the most interesting thing about slippery slopes is how you never seem to be standing at the top of them, looking down. The slope seems fine at the top, and it’s only once you start down it that you realise this could end up with some broken limbs. When Ubuntu was formed, Debian were having a debate about how to treat GFDL documentation. It was their opinion that the GFDL was inherently non-free, and they’ve since taken steps to remove all such licensed documentation from their main distribution. We took a more pragmatic approach, and decided that it maintained the spirit of freedom, and thus we continue to this day to ship that documentation in our main distribution. A similar discussion resulted in the handling of data files such as graphics, icons, fonts, etc. We decided that such things didn’t necessarily need to ship with corresponding source code, as frequently they don’t have any such thing or when they do, it’s just as easy to modify the data file directly. The slope didn’t seem at all slippery back then. Then came the issue of firmware, binary blobs in the kernel which are uploaded into a flash (or similar) chip in the hardware. Could we distribute these? On one hand, these blobs have always existed, they just used to be in ROM in the hardware; the move to firmware doesn’t change that. On the other hand, they’re machine code and if we had the source, we could improve the hardware as well. And what if we didn’t distribute them? Our users would be stuck without being able to use some fairly (to them) critical parts of their computer. In the end, the argument that firmware isn’t inherently any less free on the disk than in the ROM won, so we opted to continue to ship it. Perhaps that slope is a bit slippery, but we’ve got a good foothold. Of course, at that point somebody notices the binary “Hardware Access Layer” in the Atheros WiFi card driver. It’s not firmware, it’s run on the host processor, and is separate to “comply with FCC law”. (The ipw3495 driver has a binary daemon that allegedly performs the same legal function). Again, if we don’t distribute that, a large section of laptop users will not be able to use their WiFi cards. A compromise was reached; because the driver is necessary we’d ship it, but in a special restricted component that makes it absolutely clear that it’s not completely free. Users could choose to remove that component and any packages from it, to keep their system untainted. Ok, foothold wasn’t as strong as we thought; tumbled a bit, but we’re definitely on solid ground now! That’s what we thought, anyway. Unfortunately it seems that there’s a point a little bit lower down the slope which has a fantastic vista. The views from there are just incredible, people are saying, much prettier than where we are now. The only trouble is that we’re not sure there’s a foothold down there, if we try for the better view, we could end up broken at the bottom. I’m talking, of course, about the NVIDIA binary X driver. (Some reports/blogs/etc. indicate we’re also considering the ATI fglrx driver, this isn’t true – that driver doesn’t support AIGLX, so it’s not being considered.) We’ve shipped this driver in our restricted section, but not enabled it by default. It’s been there for people who want it to switch on, if they know how, but the default driver has always been the free (albeit obfuscated) one in the Xorg distribution. The problem is that users do not need this driver, they can get decent enough 2D graphics support from the free(ish) driver. In the long term, they may even get decent 3D graphics support from the nouveau driver effort. What’s the problem then? Simple, other operating systems use the 3D GPU to make the desktop seriously beautiful. If Linux doesn’t catch up and do the same, then we’ll be considered obsolete again. And just to drive the point home, some of our Linux friends shipped similar support in their last releases. They don’t enable the NVIDIA binary driver, but this means that a large percentage of their user base can’t get the bling without manual hackery. We needed a way to catch up with both the commerical operating systems and other Linux distributions; we have a policy of not doing our own software development, but only packaging what others have developed, so the only way for us to get ahead was to package something that others wouldn’t. Which brings us back to the NVIDIA binary driver. If we install that by default, we’ll be bringing a 3D desktop to more people. And we’ll gain a step ahead of the other distributions. Will our users care? To be brutally honest, I think the answer is no! In fact, I suspect our users will largely love us for this decision. Most probably already install the NVIDIA driver anyway, because they think it’s better, or because (sadly, like me) they have a card combination not supported by the free one. Will this make any difference to the effort to get NVIDIA to free up the driver, or at least the specs? Sorry, but to be honest again, I don’t think it’ll make one little difference. Linux distributions have been refusing to install it for years, and yet NVIDIA haven’t budged in their position. Perhaps a new tactic is required. Maybe if we do install it, we’ll be more likely to be chosen by OEMs as we can actually support the hardware they install. Then later, we may be able to actually affect their decision as to what hardware they install, and maybe then NVIDIA will pay attention. Will this change the perception of Ubuntu in the Linux developer community? I’m not sure about this one, I think that those who already feel strongly about the distribution of binary drivers are probably already pretty grumpy at us distributing things like the Atheros and ipw3495 drivers. I suspect this will change the opinion of a lot of people who’ve been on the fence until now, probably equal in both directions. Will we be able to sleep at night? Despite all of the above, personally I still think that installing and using the nvidia driver by default, when the nv driver would do, is the wrong decision. If the nv driver doesn’t work, I’m willing to accept the nvidia driver being used; provided that there’s some message informing the user what’s happened, why it has happened, and which alternate graphics cards they can purchase if they aren’t willing to accept a non-free binary driver. If the nv driver is good enough for 2D, I would prefer that we instead disabled the 3D desktop effects for this group of users (by default). A similar message could explain why this is disabled, again which alternate graphics cards provide this by default, but also provide a button for the user to enable it if they wish. While we should make the correct moral decision for the defaults, we shouldn’t stand in the way of users who wish to make a different decision for themselves. Later as the nouveau driver becomes stable, we may be able to activate 3D support for nvidia users by default. I think that preserves our current foothold, we’d only activate it if there is no free alternative. Where there is, we’d be educating users about why they may wish to consider alternatives to NVIDIA in future, while at the same time not getting too much in their way if they want to see the better view down the slope. Unfortunately it’s not my decision, and I suspect that the lure of the bling will win out. With any luck, we’ll find a foothold there, and the fallout of doing so won’t be too bad. I’m just worried that once we compromise on this, we’ll start compromising on other things … would we replace Firefox with a non-free web browser that rendered web pages “better”? The slippery slope only gets steeper from here on …

Scott James Remnant: Upstart 0.3

For the last couple of months, both at the Ubuntu Developer Summit in Mountain View and on the #upstart IRC channel, we’ve been discussing the changes we want to make to upstart for the Feisty Fawn release of Ubuntu. This will ship with a version of upstart based on the 0.3 series (it may end up getting called 0.5 before release); the primary goal for this are to have an init system that is suitable for general standalone list in any Linux distribution. I’ll be giving a talk at linux.conf.au 2007 in Sydney with that aim, I hope to persuade at least one other major Linux distribution that it’s the right solution. A complete list of the specifications and bugs being targeted for the 0.3 release can be found in Launchpad. The rest of this post will introduce some of the shiniest new things. Writing Jobs Upstart takes care of starting, supervising and stopping daemons itself; unlike in the init script system where you have to write code to do that yourself, often using a helper like start-stop-daemon. All you need to is give the path to, and arguments for, the binary you wish to be started.
exec /usr/bin/dbus-daemon
Some jobs, especially quick tasks, will usually be written as shell scripts. To save having to write a separate file and invoke it, you can include shell script code directly in the job file instead of using the exec stanza.
script
    echo /usr/share/apport/apport > /proc/sys/kernel/crashdump-helper
end script
Usually it’s not sufficient to just start a binary and wish it well; you frequently need something to be run before it is started to prepare the system, and sometimes something after it terminates to clean up again. For these purposes, additional snippets of shell code can be given – to be run before the binary is started, and after it has finished. Unlike init scripts, these do not need to start or stop the daemon itself; that’s done automatically based on the exec stanza.
pre-start script
    mkdir -p /var/run/dbus
    chown messagebus:messagebus /var/run/dbus
end script
post-stop script
    rm -f /var/run/dbus/pid
end script
For consistency, executables may be specified with pre-start exec and post-start exec instead of shell scripts as above. It’s sometimes useful to be able to run something after the binary has been started; for example, you may wish to attempt to connect to the daemon to determine whether it is ready to serve requests. post-start script or post-start exec can be used to this.
post-start script
    # wait for listen on port 80
    while ! nc -q0 localhost 80 </dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1; do
        sleep 1;
    done
end script
It’s also useful to be able to notify a daemon that it may be about to be stopped, or delay it for a while. pre-stop script or pre-stop exec can be used for this.
pre-stop script
    # disable the queue, wait for it to become empty
    fooctl disable
    while fooq >/dev/null; do
        sleep 1
    done
end script
Events Events are now quite a bit more detailed than in previous versions; they’re still named with simple strings that are up to the system sending the event, but they can now include arguments and environment variables which are passed through to jobs being started or stopped as a result.
initctl emit network-interface-up eth0 -DIFADDR=00:11:D8:98:1B:37
This command will now output all of the effects of this event, and will not terminate until the event has been fully handled inside upstart. Events such as the above can be used by jobs that examine the event arguments and environment within their script:
start on network-interface-up
script
    [ $1 = lo ] && exit 0
    grep -q $IFADDR /etc/network/blacklist && exit 0
    # etc.
 end script
or matched directly in the start on and stop on stanzas:
start on block-device-added sda*
The events generated by job state changes have also changed. Previously both jobs and events shared the same namespace, which not only caused confusion but actually caused some problems when one accidentally named a job after an event. The two primary events generated are now simply called started and stopped; they inform you that a job is fully up and running, or fully shut down again. The name of the job is received as an argument to this event.
start on started dbus
The started event is not emitted until the post-start task (described above) has finished; so the post-start task can delay other jobs from starting because they can’t yet connect to the daemon. Likewise the stopped event is not emitted until after the post-stop task has finished. The other two events emitted by a job are special; they are the starting and stopping events. The reason they are special is that the job is not permitted to start or stop until the event has been handled. This means that if you have a task to perform when your database server is stopped, but before it’s actually terminated, it’s as simple as:
start on stopping mysql
exec /usr/bin/backup-db.py
MySQL won’t be terminated until the backup has finished. This is especially useful for daemons that depend on each other, for example HAL needs DBUS, it shouldn’t be started until DBUS is running and DBUS should not be stopped until HAL has been terminated. All the HAL job needs is:
start on started dbus
stop on stopping dbus
Likewise if tomcat is installed, Apache should not be started until tomcat is running; and tomcat should not be stopped until apache has been terminated. All the tomcat job needs is:
start on starting apache
stop on stopped apache
Failure Nothing goes smoothly all of the time, sometimes tasks the job runs will fail, or the daemon itself will die. As well as providing the ability for a crashed daemon to be automatically restarted, upstart ensured that other jobs are notified with a special failed argument to the stopping and stopped events.
start on stopped typo failed
script
    echo "typo failed again :-("   mail -s "typo failed" root
end script
And if any job started or stopped by an event fails, it’s possible to discover that the event itself failed.
start on network-interface-up/failed
States While tasks such as configuring a network interface, or checking and mounting a block device are usually performed as a result of events; services are more complicated. Services normally need to be running while the system is in a certain state, not just when a particular event occurs. Therefore upstart allows you to describe arbitrarily complex system states by referring to events that define their changes. For example, many services should be running only while the filesystem is mounted, and at least one network device is up. We have events to indicate the changes into and out of these dates, we just need to combine them:
from fhs-filesystem-mounted until fhs-filesystem-unmounted
and from network-up until network-down
The until operator defines a period between two events, the and operator ensures we’re within both of these periods. Perhaps we need to be running while any display manager is:
from started gdm until stopping gdm
or started kdm until stopping kdm
Or maybe we only want to be run if a network interface comes up before bind9 has been started:
on network-interface-up and from startup until started bind9
These “complex event configurations” can appear in any job file; and any job file itself can serve as a reference for other jobs. They will be started and stopped at the same time as the named job:
with apache
Omitting the exec or script stanza from a job file means that it simply defines a state that can serve as a reference for others. As such, the multiuser state is simply a job file that defines it. As an added bonus, these states can still have pre-start, post-stop, etc. scripts.

Scott James Remnant: Hiding arguments from ps

There are many articles on the Interwobble telling you how to set the process title on Linux; they all concentrate on the problem of placing an arbitrarily long string in argv[0] to report status information in the process list. But what if argv[0] is fine, and what you want to do is remove the following arguments from the process list? Perhaps they contain sensitive information, or perhaps they’re just likely to be surprising. A fictional example may look like this (I’ve added the $ to demonstrate a later problem):
11234 ?        S      0:00 some-program --username=foo --passphrase=bar$
How not to do it The first thing you’ll probably try is just setting those arguments in the argv list to NULL. For example, with code like this:
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++)
    argv[i] = NULL;
That won’t work because that array is just a list of pointers to the real area in which the arguments are stored, and is local to your main function. Modifying it has no effect what ps and similar see. The next thing you might try, as a C programmer, is setting the first character of each argument to a NULL byte. It’s not unreasonable to assume that these strings are likely to be NULL-terminated. You might use code like:
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++)
    strcpy (argv[i], "");
But that doesn’t seem to work either, in fact, what you get in the process list is something rather odd and unexpected!
    11234 ?        S      0:00 some-program  -username=foo  -passphrase=bar$
All that’s done is lost the first character of each argument. In frustration, you might try overwriting the entire argument with NULL bytes, e.g.
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++)
    memset (argv[i], '\0', strlen (argv[i]));
Checking the process list, that will have seemed to have worked…
    11234 ?        S      0:00 some-program                                $
On closer inspection though, it’s not perfect. You’ll notice that the line ends with spaces in place of where the arguments used to be. If the number or length of arguments you’re trying to hide is particularly long, you can end up with strange blank lines in ps output. Not ideal. Why this happens To understand why this happens, we need to understand how the kernel reports the command line to ps. ps reads the /proc/PID/cmdline file, with contains the entire command line as a single character array, with each argument terminated by a NULL byte. Looking at it with od -t c, we see something like:
0000000   s   o   m   e   -   p   r   o   g   r   a   m  \0   -   -   u
0000020   s   e   r   n   a   m   e   =   f   o   o  \0   -   -   p   a
0000040   s   s   p   h   r   a   s   e   =   b   a   r  \0
When we changed just the first character to a NULL byte, we ended up with:
0000000   s   o   m   e   -   p   r   o   g   r   a   m  \0  \0   -   u
0000020   s   e   r   n   a   m   e   =   f   o   o  \0  \0   -   p   a
0000040   s   s   p   h   r   a   s   e   =   b   a   r  \0
ps is just assuming that \0 represents any argument gap, so outputs an ordinary space character every time it encounters one. This is why the first character of each argument appeared to be replaced by a space, and the rest were still printed. When we overwrite the arguments, we ended up with:
0000000   s   o   m   e   -   p   r   o   g   r   a   m  \0  \0  \0  \0
0000020  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0
0000040  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0
Writing all those zeros didn’t change the length of the command line character array, so ps got all those NULLs and output a space character for each one, assuming it was an argument break. What we need to is decrease the length of this character array, so ps only sees the first argument. How to do it The kernel maintains internal pointers to the start and end of the arguments array in the process address space. When you ask for the cmdline file in /proc, it replies with all of the characters between these two positions and a length of the difference. The kernel doesn’t provide us with any method of moving this pointer, so we’d initially appear to be stuck. However there turns out to be a very nasty solution. In order to support processes changing their title, the kernel has to support the arguments possibly overrunning into the environment space. If it thinks this has happened, it concatenates the environment space onto the end of the buffer and returns the entire area with the length set to the length up to the first NULL byte. All we need to do is fool the kernel into thinking we’ve overrun into the environment space, it’ll then just call strlen on the arguments list and return only the first argument; exactly what we want! What technique does the kernel use for deciding whether or not the arguments have overrun into the environment space? It checks whether the final character in the argument space is NULL or not. Thus paradoxically, to hide the argument list from ps, we remove the NULL …
if (argc > 1)  
    char *arg_end;
    arg_end = argv[argc-1] + strlen (argv[argc-1]);
    *arg_end = ' ';
 
The check against argc is necessary, as we don’t want to remove the NULL character on the end of argv[0] as that would cause the first environment variable to be inadvertently concatenated. Now when we look at ps, we see just the program name:
    11234 ?        S      0:00 some-program$
And even when we look in /proc/PID/cmdline, we only see the program name and no additional arguments.
0000000   s   o   m   e   -   p   r   o   g   r   a   m  \0

Scott James Remnant: Think about things

One of my pet dislikes are those people that pay lip-service to a particular problem, such as Accessibility, Internationalisation or Usability, without actually thinking about them. My favourite example can be found at the Trafford Centre in Manchester, England. Somebody there has clearly realised that accessibility is a problem, and ensured that every single sign has Braille added to it so that partially-sighted or blind people are able to read what they say. They’ve only been paying lip-service to the problem though, and not thinking about it. The evidence? The following sign, mounted directly on a door, with Braille on it: Do not stand directly in front of this door.

Scott James Remnant: Keyboards

I was really starting to worry that I wouldn’t be able to find another Cherry G80-3000 keyboard; even Cherry’s website didn’t list it anymore, instead only showing the vastly less clicky G81 range. Happily I’ve found a stockist. http://www.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/

Scott James Remnant: Something for everybody

According to the current issue (#93) of Linux Format, Ubuntu 7.04 (“Feisty Fawn”) is “…a dull release for Ubuntu, leaving Fedora to storm ahead…” (p. 23) whilst “shaping up to be one of the most innovative Linux distro releases of the year.” (p. 38) Especially amusing for myself is that, with Upstart, they “seldom notice any difference in boot speed” (p. 42), yet “Ubuntu 7.04 boots up in record time, leaving other Linux distros in the dust.” (p. 22) (As anyone who’s ever read anything about Upstart will know, Ubuntu still uses the SysV-rc scripts so there should be no difference in speed at this point. Funnily enough, they identified the reason Ubuntu boots fast in the same issue; “Changing the /bin/sh symlink to point to Dash instead of Bash can significantly shorten boot times” (p. 33) – unfortunately they simultaneously claim that Dash is only “almost POSIX compliant”, without explaining why they think it isn’t.) In this modern world, the lack of any editorial direction or basic research into what’s being printed is quite refreshing.

Scott James Remnant: Ten Really Cool Things

Come see me at LugRadio Live I will be demonstrating Ten Really Cool Things that you can do with Linux; it should be a fun show!

16 June 2007

David Moreno Garza: Stuck on my way to Edinburgh

So, here I am in Jamaica, NY, near the JFK airport. Flyglobspan’s flight to Liverpool was cancelled and scheduled until next Monday. This simply sucks and I don’t have any energy left for flaming anybody, I just did it too much during the afternoon. Just as Christine, I shouldn’t have booked with this crappy company, due to my previous feelings about this. A lady was flying on Tuesday, and they rescheduled her itinerary to today, and they simply re-rescheduled now for Monday. Also, I already had an scheduled train from Liverpool to Edinburgh and an open return. If I don’t get my way to the UK on Monday, I’ll simply won’t be able to make it for DebConf, since I had planned to get back from Edinburgh to Liverpool on Friday night or Saturday morning, Raquel could join me in NYC before of what we had planned (Saturday evening). At least, the airline is paying for a hotel. So, I’m stuck here, with two bottles of tequila, one of mezcal, a bottle of extra-spicy Valentina, a pack of ping initos, which all were presents for buddies, and all energy I wanted to spend with friends in Edinburgh. Such is life. I’m going out right now actually. I’ll see if I can catch some jazz somewhere in NYC. If any Debianer or Perler is around the neighborhood, feel free to call/text to +525529009939.

Stefano Zacchiroli: debcamp excitement

Debcamp is productive Shame on me for having underestimated the productiveness of DebCamp/DebConf. This year I'm overwhelmed by things to do and the first (for me) 2 days of DebCamp have really been productive. Yesterday the Zenoss packaging has taken off. We have already implemented (thanks to Fabio) the needed changes in dzhandle to properly handle ZEO databases, added user management for the zenoss system user, updated the documentation and we started working on the dbconfig-common stuff (we also have just noticed that Seanius, dbconfig-common author, is arriving tomorrow at DebConf, what a great occasion!). Today I've worked more on the OCaml packaging side. A first working version of OCaml 3.10.0 is now available in experimental .. ehm, oops, I meant in the NEW queue; CamlP4 available in there has been finally properly split into (huge) pieces and people can start rebuilding OCaml packages against it. Next day, actually hour, exciting adventures for me include: Wow, I'm overwhelmed, but it's actually soooo fun!

15 June 2007

James Morrison: Knackered

I know the proper word for the state I'm in now: Knackered!

Benjamin Mako Hill: European Tour

I'm off on a short European tour for the next weeks -- in all likelihood my only trip to Europe this summer. I'll be visiting three conferences where I have planned talks. These include: Between 23-26 June, I'll be traveling through the UK from Edinburgh. I have tentative stops planned for a variety of places along the way including Manchester, Cambridge, and London. I suppose there will be pub nights or something similar in each place. Get in contact if you want to meet up along the way.

11 June 2007

MJ Ray: Views on textarea Sizes

Matt Palmer wrote:
"Aaah, OK. I have no idea whether [pingbacks] work or not; they're deeply in the black magic category -- never used them."
They're just a remote procedure call. Shouldn't be black magic at all, but a surprising number of blogs seem to do them brokenly, while supporting the more complicated (but just as spammable) comment and trackback systems. On size:
"40x20 would be a good size for me. I'm not sure why people would complain that the comment box is too big, unless perhaps it interfered with the good layout of the page."
I don't think it interfered with the layout. I'll increase the size again Real Soon Now. Josh Triplett commented:
"For me, the size of the edit box doesn't matter much, because I don't use it. I just click the little "edit" button next to it that the Firefox^WIceweasel extension It's All Text provides, and then type my comment in Emacs. :)"
James commented:
"I use the resizeable form fields extension so I don't have a problem with small textareas, but http://www.sabadelli.it/edoardo/projects/javascript/form.element.resize has a script that'll make it resizeable for everyone."
Well, everyone who lets web site scripts use their CPU and electricity... Thanks for all the helpful comments.

Next.

Previous.