Search Results: "pm"

1 July 2020

Sylvain Beucler: Debian LTS and ELTS - June 2020

Debian LTS Logo Here is my transparent report for my work on the Debian Long Term Support (LTS) and Debian Extended Long Term Support (ELTS), which extend the security support for past Debian releases, as a paid contributor. In June, the monthly sponsored hours were split evenly among contributors depending on their max availability - I was assigned 30h for LTS (out of 30 max; all done) and 5.25h for ELTS (out of 20 max; all done). While LTS is part of the Debian project, fellow contributors sometimes surprise me: suggestion to vote for sponsors-funded projects with concorcet was only met with overhead concerns, and there were requests for executive / business owner decisions (we're currently heading towards consultative vote); I heard concerns about discussing non-technical issues publicly (IRC team meetings are public though); the private mail infrastructure was moved from self-hosting straight to Google; when some got an issue with Debian Social for our first video conference, there were immediate suggestions to move to Zoom...
Well, we do need some people to make those LTS firmware updates in non-free :) Also this was the last month before shifting suites: goodbye to Jessie LTS and Wheezy ELTS, welcome Stretch LTS and Jessie ELTS. ELTS - Wheezy LTS - Jessie Documentation/Scripts

30 June 2020

Chris Lamb: Free software activities in June 2020

Here is my monthly update covering what I have been doing in the free software world during June 2020 (previous month): For Lintian, the static analysis tool for Debian packages:

Reproducible Builds One of the original promises of open source software is that distributed peer review and transparency of process results in enhanced end-user security. However, whilst anyone may inspect the source code of free and open source software for malicious flaws, almost all software today is distributed as pre-compiled binaries. This allows nefarious third-parties to compromise systems by injecting malicious code into ostensibly secure software during the various compilation and distribution processes. The motivation behind the Reproducible Builds effort is to ensure no flaws have been introduced during this compilation process by promising identical results are always generated from a given source, thus allowing multiple third-parties to come to a consensus on whether a build was compromised. The project is proud to be a member project of the Software Freedom Conservancy. Conservancy acts as a corporate umbrella allowing projects to operate as non-profit initiatives without managing their own corporate structure. If you like the work of the Conservancy or the Reproducible Builds project, please consider becoming an official supporter. This month, I:

Elsewhere in our tooling, I made the following changes to diffoscope including preparing and uploading versions 147, 148 and 149 to Debian: trydiffoscope is the web-based version of diffoscope. This month, I specified a location for the celerybeat scheduler to ensure that the clean/tidy tasks are actually called which had caused an accidental resource exhaustion. (#12)

Debian I filed three bugs against: Debian LTS This month I have worked 18 hours on Debian Long Term Support (LTS) and 5 hours on its sister Extended LTS project. You can find out more about the project via the following video:
Uploads

25 June 2020

Russell Coker: How Will the Pandemic Change Things?

The Bulwark has an interesting article on why they can t Reopen America [1]. I wonder how many changes will be long term. According to the Wikipedia List of Epidemics [2] Covid-19 so far hasn t had a high death toll when compared to other pandemics of the last 100 years. People s reactions to this vary from doing nothing to significant isolation, the question is what changes in attitudes will be significant enough to change society. Transport One thing that has been happening recently is a transition in transport. It s obvious that we need to reduce CO2 and while electric cars will address the transport part of the problem in the long term changing to electric public transport is the cheaper and faster way to do it in the short term. Before Covid-19 the peak hour public transport in my city was ridiculously overcrowded, having people unable to board trams due to overcrowding was really common. If the economy returns to it s previous state then I predict less people on public transport, more traffic jams, and many more cars idling and polluting the atmosphere. Can we have mass public transport that doesn t give a significant disease risk? Maybe if we had significantly more trains and trams and better ventilation with more airflow designed to suck contaminated air out. But that would require significant engineering work to design new trams, trains, and buses as well as expense in refitting or replacing old ones. Uber and similar companies have been taking over from taxi companies, one major feature of those companies is that the vehicles are not dedicated as taxis. Dedicated taxis could easily be designed to reduce the spread of disease, the famed Black Cab AKA Hackney Carriage [3] design in the UK has a separate compartment for passengers with little air flow to/from the driver compartment. It would be easy to design such taxis to have entirely separate airflow and if setup to only take EFTPOS and credit card payment could avoid all contact between the driver and passengers. I would prefer to have a Hackney Carriage design of vehicle instead of a regular taxi or Uber. Autonomous cars have been shown to basically work. There are some concerns about safety issues as there are currently corner cases that car computers don t handle as well as people, but of course there are also things computers do better than people. Having an autonomous taxi would be a benefit for anyone who wants to avoid other people. Maybe approval could be rushed through for autonomous cars that are limited to 40Km/h (the maximum collision speed at which a pedestrian is unlikely to die), in central city areas and inner suburbs you aren t likely to drive much faster than that anyway. Car share services have been becoming popular, for many people they are significantly cheaper than owning a car due to the costs of regular maintenance, insurance, and depreciation. As the full costs of car ownership aren t obvious people may focus on the disease risk and keep buying cars. Passenger jets are ridiculously cheap. But this relies on the airline companies being able to consistently fill the planes. If they were to add measures to reduce cross contamination between passengers which slightly reduces the capacity of planes then they need to increase ticket prices accordingly which then reduces demand. If passengers are just scared of flying in close proximity and they can t fill planes then they will have to increase prices which again reduces demand and could lead to a death spiral. If in the long term there aren t enough passengers to sustain the current number of planes in service then airline companies will have significant financial problems, planes are expensive assets that are expected to last for a long time, if they can t use them all and can t sell them then airline companies will go bankrupt. It s not reasonable to expect that the same number of people will be travelling internationally for years (if ever). Due to relying on economies of scale to provide low prices I don t think it s possible to keep prices the same no matter what they do. A new economic balance of flights costing 2-3 times more than we are used to while having significantly less passengers seems likely. Governments need to spend significant amounts of money to improve trains to take over from flights that are cancelled or too expensive. Entertainment The article on The Bulwark mentions Las Vegas as a city that will be hurt a lot by reductions in travel and crowds, the same thing will happen to tourist regions all around the world. Australia has a significant tourist industry that will be hurt a lot. But the mention of Las Vegas makes me wonder what will happen to the gambling in general. Will people avoid casinos and play poker with friends and relatives at home? It seems that small stakes poker games among friends will be much less socially damaging than casinos, will this be good for society? The article also mentions cinemas which have been on the way out since the video rental stores all closed down. There s lots of prime real estate used for cinemas and little potential for them to make enough money to cover the rent. Should we just assume that most uses of cinemas will be replaced by Netflix and other streaming services? What about teenage dates, will kissing in the back rows of cinemas be replaced by Netflix and chill ? What will happen to all the prime real estate used by cinemas? Professional sporting matches have been played for a TV-only audience during the pandemic. There s no reason that they couldn t make a return to live stadium audiences when there is a vaccine for the disease or the disease has been extinguished by social distancing. But I wonder if some fans will start to appreciate the merits of small groups watching large TVs and not want to go back to stadiums, can this change the typical behaviour of groups? Restaurants and cafes are going to do really badly. I previously wrote about my experience running an Internet Cafe and why reopening businesses soon is a bad idea [4]. The question is how long this will go for and whether social norms about personal space will change things. If in the long term people expect 25% more space in a cafe or restaurant that s enough to make a significant impact on profitability for many small businesses. When I was young the standard thing was for people to have dinner at friends homes. Meeting friends for dinner at a restaurant was uncommon. Recently it seemed to be the most common practice for people to meet friends at a restaurant. There are real benefits to meeting at a restaurant in terms of effort and location. Maybe meeting friends at their home for a delivered dinner will become a common compromise, avoiding the effort of cooking while avoiding the extra expense and disease risk of eating out. Food delivery services will do well in the long term, it s one of the few industry segments which might do better after the pandemic than before. Work Many companies are discovering the benefits of teleworking, getting it going effectively has required investing in faster Internet connections and hardware for employees. When we have a vaccine the equipment needed for teleworking will still be there and we will have a discussion about whether it should be used on a more routine basis. When employees spend more than 2 hours per day travelling to and from work (which is very common for people who work in major cities) that will obviously limit the amount of time per day that they can spend working. For the more enthusiastic permanent employees there seems to be a benefit to the employer to allow working from home. It s obvious that some portion of the companies that were forced to try teleworking will find it effective enough to continue in some degree. One company that I work for has quit their coworking space in part because they were concerned that the coworking company might go bankrupt due to the pandemic. They seem to have become a 100% work from home company for the office part of the work (only on site installation and stock management is done at corporate locations). Companies running coworking spaces and other shared offices will suffer first as their clients have short term leases. But all companies renting out office space in major cities will suffer due to teleworking. I wonder how this will affect the companies providing services to the office workers, the cafes and restaurants etc. Will there end up being so much unused space in central city areas that it s not worth converting the city cinemas into useful space? There s been a lot of news about Zoom and similar technologies. Lots of other companies are trying to get into that business. One thing that isn t getting much notice is remote access technologies for desktop support. If the IT people can t visit your desk because you are working from home then they need to be able to remotely access it to fix things. When people make working from home a large part of their work time the issue of who owns peripherals and how they are tracked will get interesting. In a previous blog post I suggested that keyboards and mice not be treated as assets [5]. But what about monitors, 4G/Wifi access points, etc? Some people have suggested that there will be business sectors benefiting from the pandemic, such as telecoms and e-commerce. If you have a bunch of people forced to stay home who aren t broke (IE a large portion of the middle class in Australia) they will probably order delivery of stuff for entertainment. But in the long term e-commerce seems unlikely to change much, people will spend less due to economic uncertainty so while they may shift some purchasing to e-commerce apart from home delivery of groceries e-commerce probably won t go up overall. Generally telecoms won t gain anything from teleworking, the Internet access you need for good Netflix viewing is generally greater than that needed for good video-conferencing. Money I previously wrote about a Basic Income for Australia [6]. One of the most cited reasons for a Basic Income is to deal with robots replacing people. Now we are at the start of what could be a long term economic contraction caused by the pandemic which could reduce the scale of the economy by a similar degree while also improving the economic case for a robotic workforce. We should implement a Universal Basic Income now. I previously wrote about the make-work jobs and how we could optimise society to achieve the worthwhile things with less work [7]. My ideas about optimising public transport and using more car share services may not work so well after the pandemic, but the rest should work well. Business There are a number of big companies that are not aiming for profitability in the short term. WeWork and Uber are well documented examples. Some of those companies will hopefully go bankrupt and make room for more responsible companies. The co-working thing was always a precarious business. The companies renting out office space usually did so on a monthly basis as flexibility was one of their selling points, but they presumably rented buildings on an annual basis. As the profit margins weren t particularly high having to pay rent on mostly empty buildings for a few months will hurt them badly. The long term trend in co-working spaces might be some sort of collaborative arrangement between the people who run them and the landlords similar to the way some of the hotel chains have profit sharing agreements with land owners to avoid both the capital outlay for buying land and the risk involved in renting. Also city hotels are very well equipped to run office space, they have the staff and the procedures for running such a business, most hotels also make significant profits from conventions and conferences. The way the economy has been working in first world countries has been about being as competitive as possible. Just in time delivery to avoid using storage space and machines to package things in exactly the way that customers need and no more machines than needed for regular capacity. This means that there s no spare capacity when things go wrong. A few years ago a company making bolts for the car industry went bankrupt because the car companies forced the prices down, then car manufacture stopped due to lack of bolts this could have been a wake up call but was ignored. Now we have had problems with toilet paper shortages due to it being packaged in wholesale quantities for offices and schools not retail quantities for home use. Food was destroyed because it was created for restaurant packaging and couldn t be packaged for home use in a reasonable amount of time. Farmer s markets alleviate some of the problems with packaging food etc. But they aren t a good option when there s a pandemic as disease risk makes them less appealing to customers and therefore less profitable for vendors. Religion Many religious groups have supported social distancing. Could this be the start of more decentralised religion? Maybe have people read the holy book of their religion and pray at home instead of being programmed at church? We can always hope.
Related posts:
  1. Cruises and Covid19 Problems With Cruises GQ has an insightful and detailed article...
  2. Designing Shared Cars Almost 10 years ago I blogged about car sharing companies...
  3. Open Hardware What Would Change I have just read an interesting post speculating about the...

24 June 2020

Ian Jackson: Renaming the primary git branch to "trunk"

I have been convinced by the arguments that it's not nice to keep using the word master for the default git branch. Regardless of the etymology (which is unclear), some people say they have negative associations for this word, Changing this upstream in git is complicated on a technical level and, sadly, contested. But git is flexible enough that I can make this change in my own repositories. Doing so is not even so difficult. So: Announcement I intend to rename master to trunk in all repositories owned by my personal hat. To avoid making things very complicated for myself I will just delete refs/heads/master when I make this change. So there may be a little disruption to downstreams. I intend make this change everywhere eventually. But rather than front-loading the effort, I'm going to do this to repositories as I come across them anyway. That will allow me to update all the docs references, any automation, etc., at a point when I have those things in mind anyway. Also, doing it this way will allow me to focus my effort on the most active projects, and avoids me committing to a sudden large pile of fiddly clerical work. But: if you have an interest in any repository in particular that you want updated, please let me know so I can prioritise it. Bikeshed Why "trunk"? "Main" has been suggested elswewhere, and it is often a good replacement for "master" (for example, we can talk very sensibly about a disk's Main Boot Record, MBR). But "main" isn't quite right for the VCS case; for example a "main" branch ought to have better quality than is typical for the primary development branch. Conversely, there is much precedent for "trunk". "Trunk" was used to refer to this concept by at least SVN, CVS, RCS and CSSC (and therefore probably SCCS) - at least in the documentation, although in some of these cases the command line API didn't have a name for it. So "trunk" it is. Aside: two other words - passlist, blocklist People are (finally!) starting to replace "blacklist" and "whitelist". Seriously, why has it taken everyone this long? I have been using "blocklist" and "passlist" for these concepts for some time. They are drop-in replacements. I have also heard "allowlist" and "denylist" suggested, but they are cumbersome and cacophonous. Also "allow" and "deny" seem to more strongly imply an access control function than merely "pass" and "block", and the usefulness of passlists and blocklists extends well beyond access control: protocol compatibility and ABI filtering are a couple of other use cases.

comment count unavailable comments

21 June 2020

Daniel Lange: Upgrading Limesurvey with (near) zero downtime

Limesurvey is an online survey tool. It is very powerful and commonly used in academic environments because it is Free Software (GPLv2+), allows for local installations protecting the data of participants and allowing to comply with data protection regulations. This also means there are typically no load-balanced multi-server szenarios with HA databases. But simple VMs where Limesurvey runs and needs upgrading in place. There's an LTS branch (currently 3.x) and a stable branch (currently 4.x). There's also a 2.06 LTS branch that is restricted to paying customers. The main developers behind Limesurvey offer many services from template design to custom development to support to hosting ("Cloud", "Limesurvey Pro"). Unfortunately they also charge for easy updates called "ComfortUpdate" (currently 39 for three months) and the manual process is made a bit cumbersome to make the "ComfortUpdate" offer more attractive. Due to Limesurvey being an old code base and UI elements not being clearly separated, most serious use cases will end up patching files and symlinking logos around template directories. That conflicts a bit with the opaque "ComfortUpdate" process where you push a button and then magic happens. Or you have downtime and a recovery case while surveys are running. If you do not intend to use the "ComfortUpdate" offering, you can prevent Limesurvey from connecting to http://comfortupdate.limesurvey.org daily by adding the updatable stanza as in line 14 to limesurvey/application/config/config.php:
  1. return array(
  2. [...]
  3. // Use the following config variable to set modified optional settings copied from config-defaults.php
  4. 'config'=>array(
  5. // debug: Set this to 1 if you are looking for errors. If you still get no errors after enabling this
  6. // then please check your error-logs - either in your hosting provider admin panel or in some /logs directory
  7. // on your webspace.
  8. // LimeSurvey developers: Set this to 2 to additionally display STRICT PHP error messages and get full access to standard templates
  9. 'debug'=>0,
  10. 'debugsql'=>0, // Set this to 1 to enanble sql logging, only active when debug = 2
  11. // Mysql database engine (INNODB MYISAM):
  12. 'mysqlEngine' => 'MYISAM'
  13. , // Update default LimeSurvey config here
  14. 'updatable' => false,
  15. )
  16. );
The comma on line 13 is placed like that in the current default limesurvey config.php, don't let yourself get confused. Every item in a php array must end with a comma. It can be on the next line. The basic principle of low risk, near-zero downtime, in-place upgrades is:
  1. Create a diff between the current release and the target release
  2. Inspect the diff
  3. Make backups of the application webroot
  4. Patch a copy of the application in-place
  5. (optional) stop the web server
  6. Make a backup of the production database
  7. Move the patched application to the production webroot
  8. (if 5) Start the webserver
  9. Upgrade the database (if needed)
  10. Check the application
So, in detail: Continue reading "Upgrading Limesurvey with (near) zero downtime"

19 June 2020

Russell Coker: Storage Trends

In considering storage trends for the consumer side I m looking at the current prices from MSY (where I usually buy computer parts). I know that other stores will have slightly different prices but they should be very similar as they all have low margins and wholesale prices are the main factor. Small Hard Drives Aren t Viable The cheapest hard drive that MSY sells is $68 for 500G of storage. The cheapest SSD is $49 for 120G and the second cheapest is $59 for 240G. SSD is cheaper at the low end and significantly faster. If someone needed about 500G of storage there s a 480G SSD for $97 which costs $29 more than a hard drive. With a modern PC if you have no hard drives you will notice that it s quieter. For anyone who s buying a new PC spending an extra $29 is definitely worthwhile for the performance, low power use, and silence. The cheapest 1TB disk is $69 and the cheapest 1TB SSD is $159. Saving $90 on the cost of a new PC probably isn t worth while. For 2TB of storage the cheapest options are Samsung NVMe for $339, Crucial SSD for $335, or a hard drive for $95. Some people would choose to save $244 by getting a hard drive instead of NVMe, but if you are getting a whole system then allocating $244 to NVMe instead of a faster CPU would probably give more benefits overall. Computer stores typically have small margins and computer parts tend to quickly either become cheaper or be obsoleted by better parts. So stores don t want to stock parts unless they will sell quickly. Disks smaller than 2TB probably aren t going to be profitable for stores for very long. The trend of SSD and NVMe becoming cheaper is going to make 2TB disks non-viable in the near future. NVMe vs SSD M.2 NVMe devices are at comparable prices to SATA SSDs. For some combinations of quality and capacity NVMe is about 50% more expensive and for some it s slightly cheaper (EG Intel 1TB NVMe being cheaper than Samsung EVO 1TB SSD). Last time I checked about half the motherboards on sale had a single M.2 socket so for a new workstation that doesn t need more than 2TB of storage (the largest NVMe that MSY sells) it wouldn t make sense to use anything other than NVMe. The benefit of NVMe is NOT throughput (even though NVMe devices can often sustain over 4GB/s), it s low latency. Workstations can t properly take advantage of this because RAM is so cheap ($198 for 32G of DDR4) that compiles etc mostly come from cache and because most filesystem writes on workstations aren t synchronous. For servers a large portion of writes are synchronous, for example a mail server can t acknowledge receiving mail until it knows that it s really on disk, so there s a lot of small writes that block server processes and the low latency of NVMe really improves performance. If you are doing a big compile on a workstation (the most common workstation task that uses a lot of disk IO) then the writes aren t synchronised to disk and if the system crashes you will just do all the compilation again. While NVMe doesn t give a lot of benefit over SSD for workstation use (I ve uses laptops with SSD and NVMe and not noticed a great difference) of course I still want better performance. ;) Last time I checked I couldn t easily buy a PCIe card that supported 2*NVMe cards, I m sure they are available somewhere but it would take longer to get and probably cost significantly more than twice as much. That means a RAID-1 of NVMe takes 2 PCIe slots if you don t have an M.2 socket on the motherboard. This was OK when I installed 2*NVMe devices on a server that had 18 disks and lots of spare PCIe slots. But for some systems PCIe slots are an issue. My home server has all PCIe slots used by a video card and Ethernet cards and the BIOS probably won t support booting from NVMe. It s a Dell server so I can t just replace the motherboard with one that has more PCIe slots and M.2 on the motherboard. As it s running nicely and doesn t need replacing any time soon I won t be using NVMe for home server stuff. Small Servers Most servers that I am responsible for have less than 2TB of storage. For my clients I now only recommend SSD storage for small servers and am recommending SSD for replacing any failed disks. My home server has 2*500G SSDs in a BTRFS RAID-1 for the root filesystem, and 3*4TB disks in a BTRFS RAID-1 for storing big files. I bought the SSDs when 500G SSDs were about $250 each and bought 2*4TB disks when they were about $350 each. Currently that server has about 3.3TB of space used and I could probably get it down to about 2.5TB if I deleted things I don t really need. If I was getting storage for that server now I d use 2*2TB SSDs and 3*1TB hard drives for the stuff that doesn t fit on SSDs (I have some spare 1TB disks that came with servers). If I didn t have spare hard drives I d get 3*2TB SSDs for that sort of server which would give 3TB of BTRFS RAID-1 storage. Last time I checked Dell servers had a card for supporting M.2 as an optional extra so Dells probably won t boot from NVMe without extra expense. Ars Technica has an informative article about WD selling SMR disks as NAS disks [1]. The Shingled Magnetic Recording technology allows greater storage density on a platter which leads to either larger capacity or cheaper disks but at the cost of lower write performance and apparently extremely bad latency in some situations. NAS disks are supposed to be low latency as the expectation is that they will be used in a RAID array and kicked out of the array if they have problems. There are reports of ZFS kicking SMR disks from RAID sets. I think this will end the use of hard drives for small servers. For a server you don t want to deal with this sort of thing, by definition when a server goes down multiple people will stop work (small server implies no clustering). Spending extra to get SSDs just to avoid the risk of unexpected SMR would be a good plan. Medium Servers The largest SSD and NVMe devices that are readily available are 2TB but 10TB disks are commodity items, there are reports of 20TB hard drives being available but I can t find anyone in Australia selling them. If you need to store dozens or hundreds of terabytes than hard drives have to be part of the mix at this time. There s no technical reason why SSDs larger than 10TB can t be made (the 2.5 SATA form factor has more than 5* the volume of a 2TB M.2 card) and it s likely that someone sells them outside the channels I buy from, but probably at a price higher than what my clients are willing to pay. If you want 100TB of affordable storage then a mid range server like the Dell PowerEdge T640 which can have up to 18*3.5 disks is good. One of my clients has a PowerEdge T630 with 18*3.5 disks in the 8TB-10TB range (we replace failed disks with the largest new commodity disks available, it used to have 6TB disks). ZFS version 0.8 introduced a Special VDEV Class which stores metadata and possibly small data blocks on faster media. So you could have some RAID-Z groups on hard drives for large storage and the metadata on a RAID-1 on NVMe for fast performance. For medium size arrays on hard drives having a find / operation take hours is not uncommon, for large arrays having it take days isn t that uncommon. So far it seems that ZFS is the only filesystem to have taken the obvious step of storing metadata on SSD/NVMe while bulk data is on cheap large disks. One problem with large arrays is that the vibration of disks can affect the performance and reliability of nearby disks. The ZFS server I run with 18 disks was originally setup with disks from smaller servers that never had ZFS checksum errors, but when disks from 2 small servers were put in one medium size server they started getting checksum errors presumably due to vibration. This alone is a sufficient reason for paying a premium for SSD storage. Currently the cost of 2TB of SSD or NVMe is between the prices of 6TB and 8TB hard drives, and the ratio of price/capacity for SSD and NVMe is improving dramatically while the increase in hard drive capacity is slow. 4TB SSDs are available for $895 compared to a 10TB hard drive for $549, so it s 4* more expensive on a price per TB. This is probably good for Windows systems, but for Linux systems where ZFS and special VDEVs is an option it s probably not worth considering. Most Linux user cases where 4TB SSDs would work well would be better served by smaller NVMe and 10TB disks running ZFS. I don t think that 4TB SSDs are at all popular at the moment (MSY doesn t stock them), but prices will come down and they will become common soon enough. Probably by the end of the year SSDs will halve in price and no hard drives less than 4TB will be viable. For rack mounted servers 2.5 disks have been popular for a long time. It s common for vendors to offer 2 versions of a rack mount server for 2.5 and 3.5 disks where the 2.5 version takes twice as many disks. If the issue is total storage in a server 4TB SSDs can give the same capacity as 8TB HDDs. SMR vs Regular Hard Drives Rumour has it that you can buy 20TB SMR disks, I haven t been able to find a reference to anyone who s selling them in Australia (please comment if you know who sells them and especially if you know the price). I expect that the ZFS developers will soon develop a work-around to solve the problems with SMR disks. Then arrays of 20TB SMR disks with NVMe for special VDEVs will be an interesting possibility for storage. I expect that SMR disks will be the majority of the hard drive market by 2023 if hard drives are still on the market. SSDs will be large enough and cheap enough that only SMR disks will offer enough capacity to be worth using. I think that it is a possibility that hard drives won t be manufactured in a few years. The volume of a 3.5 disk is significantly greater than that of 10 M.2 devices so current technology obviously allows 20TB of NVMe or SSD storage in the space of a 3.5 disk. If the price of 16TB NVMe and SSD devices comes down enough (to perhaps 3* the price of a 20TB hard drive) almost no-one would want the hard drive and it wouldn t be viable to manufacture them. It s not impossible that in a few years time 3D XPoint and similar fast NVM technologies occupy the first level of storage (the ZFS special VDEV , OS swap device, log device for database servers, etc) and NVMe occupies the level for bulk storage with no space left in the market for spinning media. Computer Cases For servers I expect that models supporting 3.5 storage devices will disappear. A 1RU server with 8*2.5 storage devices or a 2RU server with 16*2.5 storage devices will probably be of use to more people than a 1RU server with 4*3.5 or a 2RU server with 8*3.5 . My first IBM PC compatible system had a 5.25 hard drive, a 5.25 floppy drive, and a 3.5 floppy drive in 1988. My current PC is almost a similar size and has a DVD drive (that I almost never use) 5 other 5.25 drive bays that have never been used, and 5*3.5 drive bays that I have never used (I have only used 2.5 SSDs). It would make more sense to have PC cases designed around 2.5 and maybe 3.5 drives with no more than one 5.25 drive bay. The Intel NUC SFF PCs are going in the right direction. Many of them only have a single storage device but some of them have 2*M.2 sockets allowing RAID-1 of NVMe and some of them support ECC RAM so they could be used as small servers. A USB DVD drive costs $36, it doesn t make sense to have every PC designed around the size of an internal DVD drive that will probably only be used to install the OS when a $36 USB DVD drive can be used for every PC you own. The only reason I don t have a NUC for my personal workstation is that I get my workstations from e-waste. If I was going to pay for a PC then a NUC is the sort of thing I d pay to have on my desk.
Related posts:
  1. Finding Storage Performance Problems Here are some basic things to do when debugging storage...
  2. New Storage Developments Eweek has an article on a new 1TB Seagate drive....
  3. Cheap Bulk Storage The Problem Some of my clients need systems that store...

18 June 2020

Enrico Zini: Missing Qt5 designer library in cross-build development

This is part of a series of posts on compiling a custom version of Qt5 in order to develop for both amd64 and a Raspberry Pi. The problem While testing the cross-compiler, we noticed that the designer library was not being built. The designer library is needed to build designer plugins, which allow loading, dynamically at runtime, .ui interface files that use custom widgets. The error the customer got at runtime is: QFormBuilder was unable to create a custom widget of the class ' '; defaulting to base class 'QWidget'. The library with the custom widget implementation was correctly linked, and indeed the same custom widget was used by the application in other parts of its interface not loaded via .ui files. It turns out that it is not sufficient, and to load custom widgets automatically, QUiLoader wants to read their metadata from plugin libraries containing objects that implement the QDesignerCustomWidgetInterface interface. Sadly, building such a library requires using QT += designer, and the designer library, that was not being built by Qt5's build system. This looks very much like a Qt5 bug. A work around would be to subclass QUiLoader extending createWidget to teach it how to create the custom widgets we need. Unfortunately, the customer has many custom widgets. The investigation To find out why designer was not being built, I added -d to the qmake invocation at the end of qtbase/configure, and trawled through the 3.1G build output. The needle in the haystack seems to be here: 
DEBUG 1: /home/build/armhf/qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0/qttools/src/designer/src/src.pro:18: SUBDIRS := uiplugin uitools lib components designer plugins
DEBUG 1: /home/build/armhf/qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0/qttools/src/designer/src/src.pro:23: calling qtNomakeTools(lib components designer plugins)
As far as I can understand, qtNomakeTools seems to be intended to disable building those components if QT_BUILD_PARTS doesn't contain tools. For cross-building, QT_BUILD_PARTS is libs examples, so designer does not get built. However, designer contains the library part needed for QDesignerCustomWidgetInterface and that really needs to be built. I assume that part should really be built as part of libs, not tools. The fixes/workarounds I tried removing designer from the qtNomakeTools invocation at qttools/src/designer/src/src.pro:23, to see if qttools/src/designer/src/designer/ would get built. It did get built, but then build failed with designer/src/designer and designer/src/uitools both claiming the designer plugin. I tried editing qttools/src/designer/src/uitools/uitools.pro not to claim the designer plugin when tools is not a build part. I added the tweaks to the Qt5 build system as debian/patches. 2 hours of build time later... make check is broken: 
make[6]: Leaving directory '/home/build/armhf/qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0/qttools/src/designer/src/uitools'
make[5]: *** No rule to make target 'sub-components-check', needed by 'sub-designer-check'.  Stop.
But since make check doesn't do anything in this build, we can simply override dh_auto_test to skip that step. Finally, this patch builds a new executable, of an architecture that makes dh_shlibdeps struggle: 
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library libQt5DesignerComponentssystem.so.5 needed by debian/qtbase5system-armhf-dev/opt/qt5system-armhf/bin/designer (ELF format: 'elf32-little' abi: '0101002800000000'; RPATH: '')
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library libQt5Designersystem.so.5 needed by debian/qtbase5system-armhf-dev/opt/qt5system-armhf/bin/designer (ELF format: 'elf32-little' abi: '0101002800000000'; RPATH: '')
And we can just skip running dh_shlibdeps on the designer executable. The result is in the qt5custom git repository.

Gunnar Wolf: On masters and slaves, whitelists and blacklists...

LWN published today yet another great piece of writing, Loaded terms in free software. I am sorry, the content will not be immediately available to anybody following at home, as LWN is based on a subscription model But a week from now, the article will be open for anybody to read. Or you can ask me (you most likely can find my contact addresses, as they are basically everywhere) for a subscriber link, I will happily provide it. In consonance with the current mood that started with the killing of George Floyd and sparked worldwide revolts against police brutality, racism (mostly related to police and law enforcement forces, but social as well) and the like, the debate that already started some months ago in technical communities has re-sparked: We have many terms that come with long histories attached to them, and we are usually oblivious to their obvious meaning. We? Yes, we, the main users and creators of technology. I never felt using master and slave to refer to different points of a protocol, bus, clock or whatever (do refer to the Wikipedia article for a fuller explanation) had any negative connotations but then again, those terms have never tainted my personal family. That is, I understand I speak from a position of privilege. A similar although less heated issue goes around the blacklist and whitelist terms, or other uses that use white to refer to good, law-abiding citizens, and black to refer to somewhat antisocial uses (i.e. the white hat and black hat hackers). For several years, this debate has been sparking and dying off. Some important changes have been made Particularly, in 2017 the Internet Software Consortium started recommending Primary and Secondary, Python dropped master/slave pairs after a quite thorough and deep review throughout 2018, GitHub changed the default branch from master to main earlier this week. The Internet Engineering Task Force has a draft (that lapsed and thus sadly didn t become an RFC, but still, is archived), Terminology, Power and Oppressive Language that lists suggested alternatives:
There are also many other relationships that can be used as metaphors, Eglash s research calls into question the accuracy of the master-slave metaphor. Fortunately, there are ample alternatives for the master-slave relationship. Several options are suggested here and should be chosen based on the pairing that is most clear in context:
  • Primary-secondary
  • Leader-follower
  • Active-standby
  • Primary-replica
  • Writer-reader
  • Coordinator-worker
  • Parent-helper
I ll add that I think we Spanish-speakers are not fully aware of the issue s importance, because the most common translation I have seen for master/slave is maestro/esclavo: Maestro is the word for teacher (although we do keep our slaves in place). But think whether it sounds any worse if you refer to device pairs, or members of a database high-availability cluster, or whatever as Amo and Esclavo. It does sound much worse I cannot add much of value to this debate. I am just happy issues like this are being recognized and dealt with. If the topic interests you, do refer to the LWN article! Some excrepts: I consider the following to be the core of Jonathan Corbet s writeup:
Recent events, though, have made it clear even to those of us who were happy to not question this view that the story of slavery and the wider racist systems around it is not yet finished. There are many people who are still living in the middle of it, and it is not a nice place to be. We are not so enlightened as we like to think we are. If there is no other lesson from the events of the last few weeks, we should certainly take to heart the point that we need to be listening to the people who have been saying, for many years, that they are still suffering. If there are people who are telling us that terms like slave or blacklist are a hurtful reminder of the inequities that persist in our society, we need to accept that as the truth and act upon it. Etymological discussions on what, say, master really means may be interesting, but they miss the point and are irrelevant to this discussion.
Part of a comment by user yokem_55:
Often, it seems to me that the replacement words are much more descriptive and precise than the old language. Allowlist is far more obviously a list of explicitly authorized entities than whitelist . Mainline has a more obvious meaning of a core stream of development than master . The benefit of moving past this language is more than just changing cultural norms, it s better, more precise communication across the board.
Another spot-on comment, by user alan:
From my perspective as a Black American male, I think that it s nice to see people willing to see and address racism in various spheres. I am concerned that some of these steps will be more performative than substantial. Terminology changes in software so as to be more welcoming is a nice thing. Ensuring that oppressed minorities have access to the tools and resources to help reduce inequity and ensuring equal protection under the laws is better. We ll get there one day I m sure. The current ask is much simpler, its just to stop randomly killing and terrorizing us. Please and thank you.
So Maybe the protests of this year caught special notoriety because the society is reacting after (or during, for many of us) the lockdown. In any case, I hope for their success in changing the planet s culture of oppression.

Comments Tomas Janousek 2020-06-19 10:04:32 +0200 In the blog post On masters and slaves, whitelists and blacklists you claim that GitHub changed the default branch from master to main earlier this week but I don t think that change is in effect yet. When you create a repo, the default branch is still named master . Gunnar Wolf 2020-06-19 11:52:30 -0500 Umh, seems you are right. Well, what can I say? I m reporting only what I have been able to find / read Now, given that said master branch does not carry any Git-specific meaning and is just a commonly used configuration I hope people start picking it up. No, I have not renamed master branches in any of my repos but intend to do so soonish. Tomas Janousek 2020-06-19 20:01:52 +0200 Yeah, don t worry. I just find it sad that so much inaccurate news is spreading from a single CEO tweet, and I wanted to help stop that. I m sure some change will happen eventually, but until it does, we shouldn t speak about it in the past tense. :-)

15 June 2020

Enrico Zini: Qt5 custom build of Qt Creator

This is part of a series of posts on compiling a custom version of Qt5 in order to develop for both amd64 and a Raspberry Pi. These are instructions for building Qt Creator with the custom Qt, so that it can load and use Designer plugins built with it. Sadly, because of the requirement of being able to load Designer plugins, and because of the requirement of being able to compile custom widgets using the custom Qt and use them in the Designer, we need to also rebuild Qt Creator. The resulting packaging is at https://github.com/Truelite/qt5custom. Set up sources Open the source tarball, and add the Qt Creator packaging: 
tar axf qt-creator-enterprise-src-4.12.2.tar.xz
cp -a debian-qtcreator qt-creator-enterprise-src-4.12.2/debian
ln -s qt-creator-enterprise-src-4.12.2.tar.xz qt-creator-enterprise-src_4.12.2.orig.tar.xz
If needed, install the Qt license: 
cp qt-license.txt ~/.qt-license
Install build dependencies You can use apt build-dep to install dependencies manually: 
cd qt-creator-enterprise-src-4.12.2
apt build-dep .
Alternatively, you can create an installable .deb metapackage that depends on the build dependencies: 
apt install devscripts
mk-build-deps debian-qtcreator/control
apt -f install qt-creator-enterprise-src-build-deps_4.12.2-1_all.deb
Package build The package is built by debian/rules base on the excellent work done by Debian Qt5 maintainers. After installing the build dependencies, you can build like this: 
cd qt-creator-enterprise-src-4.12.2
debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot
In debian/rules you can configure NUMJOBS with the number of available CPUs in the machine, to have parallel builds. debian/rules automatically picks qt5custom as the Qt version to use for the build. NOTE: Qt Creator 4.12.2 will NOT build if qtbase5custom-armhf-dev is installed. One needs to make sure to have qtbase5custom-dev installed, but NOT qtbase5custom-armhf-dev. Despite quite a bit of investigation, I have been unable to understand why, if both are installed, Qt Creator's build chooses the wrong one, and fails the build. Build output Building sources generates 4 packages: Using the custom Qt Creator Enterprise The packages are built with qt5custom and install their content in /opt/qt5custom. The packages are coinstallable with the version of Qt Creator packaged in Debian. The custom Qt Creator executable is installed in /opt/qt5custom/bin/qtcreator, which is not in $PATH by default. To run it, you can explitly use /opt/qt5custom/bin/qtcreator. qtcreator ran without an explicit path, runs the standard Debian version. Installing Designer plugins Designer plugings can be compiled with qt5custom and installed in /opt/qt5custom/plugins/designer/. Cross-building with Qt Creator Once the cross-build Qt5 packages are installed, one should see it appear in the Qt Creator kit configuration, where it can be selected and used normally. If one sets device type to "Generic Linux Device", chooses a compiler for "arm 32bit" and sets Qt Version to "qt5custom-armhf", one can smoothly cross-compile and execute and debug the built program directly on the device.

12 June 2020

Enrico Zini: Qt5 custom build for armhf embedded development

This is part of a series of posts on compiling a custom version of Qt5 in order to develop for both amd64 and a Raspberry Pi. I split building Qt5 for armhf development in two parts: one cross-build environment to be installed on amd64 develpment systems, and a runtime part to be installed on the target armhf hardware. Building a Qt5 cross-building environment builds a mix of armhf and amd64 binares: the amd64 tools to use for cross-building, like moc, qmake, plugins for Qt Creator, and so on; armhf headers and libraries to use at cross-build time; armhf shared libraries to use at runtime. The procedure I came up with builds a devel package for amd64 development machines, which contains everything, and a second package that extracts from it only what is needed at runtime. The cross-build environment is coinstallable both with the version of Qt distributed with Debian, and with the amd64 custom Qt development package. The current build is sadly using -skip qtwebengine, because I have had no success so far getting QtWebEngine to compile as part of a cross-build Qt setup (the last road bump I can't overcome is nss and nspr not being coinstallable on amd64 and armhf, while both seem to be needed for it). The resulting packaging is at https://github.com/Truelite/qt5custom. Set up sources Open the source tarball, and add the amd64 packaging: 
tar axf qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0.tar.xz
cp -a debian-cross qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0/debian
If needed, install the Qt license: 
cp qt-license.txt ~/.qt-license
If debugging information are not needed in armhf development, remove --no-strip from ./configure invocation in the rules file, to build significantly smaller .deb packages. Install build dependencies Install cross-compilers: 
dpkg --add-architecture armhf
apt install crossbuild-essential-armhf
You can use apt build-dep to install dependencies manually: 
cd qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0
apt build-dep .
apt -a armhf build-dep .
Alternatively, you can create installable .deb metapackages that depends on the build dependencies: 
apt install devscripts
mk-build-deps --host-arch amd64 debian-cross/control
mk-build-deps --host-arch armhf debian-cross/control
apt -f install qt-everywhere-cross-build-deps_5.15.0-1_amd64.deb qt-everywhere-cross-cross-build-deps_5.15.0-1_armhf.deb
Note that there are two sets of dependencies: one of amd64 packages, and one of armhf packages. Building the cross-build environment After installing the build dependencies, you can build like this: 
cd qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0
fakeroot debian/rules binary
In debian/rules you can configure NUMJOBS with the number of available CPUs in the machine, to have parallel builds. This will build a package with the cross-build development environment for amd64, called qtbase5custom-armhf-dev Building the runtime environment To generate the runtime package for armhf, one needs to have the cross-build package (qtbase5custom-armhf-dev) installed in the system together with its build dependencies. At that point, the armhf runtime package can be built using the debian-armhf directory without further sources: 
apt install crossbuild-essential-armhf debhelper qtbase5custom-armhf-dev*_amd64.deb qt-everywhere-src-cross-build-deps*_armhf.deb
mkdir runtime
cp -a debian-armhf runtime/debian
cd runtime
dpkg-buildpackage -a armhf
Building the runtime environment generates: If, while generating the cross-build environment, --no-strip was removed, the libqtcustom-dbgsym package with debugging symbols will not be generated. Using the cross-build environment These install their content in /opt, and are coninstallable with the version of Qt distributed in Debian, and with the custom Qt packages for amd64. One needs to be careful not to create programs that link, either directly or indirectly, with more than one of these coinstalled Qt, because the in memory layout of objects could be different and incompatible, causing unexpected results. Selecting which Qt version to use: qtchooser These Qt custom packages integrate with qtchooser to select the version of Qt to use at compile time. qtchooser --list-versions lists available versions. One can choose what to use by exporting QT_SELECT: 
# apt install qtchooser qt5-qmake qt5-default
$ qtchooser --list-versions
4
5
qt4-x86_64-linux-gnu
qt4
qt5-x86_64-linux-gnu
qt5
qt5custom-x86_64-linux-gnu
qt5custom
qt5custom-armhf-x86_64-linux-gnu
qt5custom-armhf
$ qmake --version
QMake version 3.1
Using Qt version 5.11.3 in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
$ export QT_SELECT=qt5custom-armhf
$ qmake --version
QMake version 3.1
Using Qt version 5.15.0 in /opt/qt5custom-armhf/lib
Cross-building software using custom Qt One just needs to export QT_SELECT=qt5custom-armhf in the environment, then proceed to build normally: 
export QT_SELECT=qt5custom-armhf
fakeroot ./debian/rules clean binary
Or: 
export QT_SELECT=qt5custom-armhf
qmake file.pro
If switching from one Qt to another, it is possible that the makefiles created by one qmake are not working well with the other. In that case, one can just remove them and regenerate them. The build result is ready to be copied into, and run in, the target armhf device.

11 June 2020

Enrico Zini: Custom build of Qt5

This is part of a series of posts on compiling a custom version of Qt5 in order to develop for both amd64 and a Raspberry Pi. A customer needs a procedure for a custom build of Qt5 5.15, the last LTS release of Qt 5. They develop for industrial systems that are managed by an amd64 industrial computer. This computer is accessed either through an attached panel touch screen, or through touch screens driven by Raspberry Pi clients connected via an internal ethernet network. The control interfaces use mostly a full screen Qt5 application. The customer relies heavily on Qt5, has a full Enterprise license, and needs to stay on top of the most recent releases, to make use of new features or bug fixes that have made it upstream since the last Debian stable was released. This is a list of requirements for this job: To make things easier, .deb packages are for internal use only and do not need to be compliant with Debian policy. I estimate a difficulty level of: "Bring the One Ring to Mount Doom and remember to get milk on the way back". The journey begins. The resulting packaging is at https://github.com/Truelite/qt5custom.

Enrico Zini: Qt5 custom build for amd64

This is part of a series of posts on compiling a custom version of Qt5 in order to develop for both amd64 and a Raspberry Pi. First step, build Qt5 5.15 packages for amd64. To prevent conflicting with Debian Qt packages, we'll install everything in /opt. We can install qtchooser configuration files to allow developers to easily switch between Debian's standard Qt version or the custom version, at will. The resulting packaging is at https://github.com/Truelite/qt5custom. Set up sources Open the source tarball, and add the amd64 packaging: 
tar axf qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0.tar.xz
cp -a debian-amd64 qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0/debian
If needed, install the Qt license: 
cp qt-license.txt ~/.qt-license
Install build dependencies You can use apt build-dep to install dependencies manually: 
cd qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0
apt build-dep .
Alternatively, you can create an installable .deb metapackage that depends on the build dependencies: 
apt install devscripts
mk-build-deps debian-amd64/control
apt -f install qt-everywhere-src-build-deps_5.15.0-1_amd64.deb
Package build The package is built by debian/rules base on the excellent work done by Debian Qt5 maintainers After installing the build dependencies, you can build like this: 
cd qt-everywhere-src-5.15.0
fakeroot debian/rules binary
In debian/rules you can configure NUMJOBS with the number of available CPUs in the machine, to have parallel builds. Build output Building sources generates 4 packages: qtbase5custom-dev and libqt5custom are needed for development; only libqt5custom is needed to run build programs. Using custom Qt for amd64 These Qt custom packages install their content in /opt, and are coninstallable with the version of Qt distributed in Debian. One needs to be careful not to create programs that link, either directly or indirectly, with both the Debian Qt and the custom Qt, because the in memory layout of objects could be different and incompatible, causing unexpected results. Selecting which Qt version to use: qtchooser These Qt custom packages integrate with qtchooser to select the version of Qt to use at compile time. qtchooser --list-versions lists available versions. One can choose what to use by exporting QT_SELECT: 
# apt install qtchooser qt5-qmake qt5-default
$ qtchooser --list-versions
4
5
qt4-x86_64-linux-gnu
qt4
qt5-x86_64-linux-gnu
qt5
qt5custom-x86_64-linux-gnu
qt5custom
$ qmake --version
QMake version 3.1
Using Qt version 5.11.3 in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
$ export QT_SELECT=qt5custom
$ qmake --version
QMake version 3.1
Using Qt version 5.15.0 in /opt/qt5custom/lib
Building software using custom Qt One just needs to export QT_SELECT=qt5custom in the environment, then proceed to build normally: 
export QT_SELECT=qt5custom
fakeroot ./debian/rules clean binary
Or: 
export QT_SELECT=qt5custom
qmake file.pro
If switching from one Qt to another, it is possible that the makefiles created by one qmake are not working well with the other. In that case, one can just remove them and regenerate them.

Antoine Beaupr : CVE-2020-13777 GnuTLS audit: be scared

So CVE-2020-13777 came out while I wasn't looking last week. The GnuTLS advisory (GNUTLS-SA-2020-06-03) is pretty opaque so I'll refer instead to this tweet from @FiloSottile (Go team security lead):
PSA: don't rely on GnuTLS, please. CVE-2020-13777 Whoops, for the past 10 releases most TLS 1.0 1.2 connection could be passively decrypted and most TLS 1.3 connections intercepted. Trivially. Also, TLS 1.2 1.0 session tickets are awful.
You are reading this correctly: supposedly encrypted TLS connections made with affected GnuTLS releases are vulnerable to passive cleartext recovery attack (and active for 1.3, but who uses that anyways). That is extremely bad. It's pretty close to just switching everyone to HTTP instead of HTTPS, more or less. I would have a lot more to say about the security of GnuTLS in particular -- and security in general -- but I am mostly concerned about patching holes in the roof right now, so this article is not about that. This article is about figuring out what, exactly, was exposed in our infrastructure because of this.

Affected packages Assuming you're running Debian, this will show a list of packages that Depends on GnuTLS: 
apt-cache --installed rdepends libgnutls30   grep '^ '   sort -u
This assumes you run this only on hosts running Buster or above. Otherwise you'll need to figure out a way to pick machines running GnuTLS 3.6.4 or later. Note that this list only first level dependencies! It is perfectly possible that another package uses GnuTLS without being listed here. For example, in the above list I have libcurl3-gnutls, so the be really thorough, I would actually need to recurse down the dependency tree. On my desktop, this shows an "interesting" list of targets:
  • apt
  • cadaver - AKA WebDAV
  • curl & wget
  • fwupd - another attack on top of this one
  • git (through the libcurl3-gnutls dependency)
  • mutt - all your emails
  • weechat - your precious private chats
Arguably, fetchers like apt, curl, fwupd, and wget rely on HTTPS for "authentication" more than secrecy, although apt has its own OpenPGP-based authentication so that wouldn't matter anyways. Still, this is truly distressing. And I haven't mentioned here things like gobby, network-manager, systemd, and others - the scope of this is broad. Hell, even good old lynx links against GnuTLS. In our infrastructure, the magic command looks something like this: 
cumin -o txt -p 0  'F:lsbdistcodename=buster' "apt-cache --installed rdepends libgnutls30   grep '^ '   sort -u"   tee gnutls-rdepds-per-host   awk ' print $NF '   sort   uniq -c   sort -n
There, the result is even more worrisome, as those important packages seem to rely on GnuTLS for their transport security:
  • mariadb - all MySQL traffic and passwords
  • mandos - full disk encryption
  • slapd - LDAP passwords
mandos is especially distressing although it's probably not vulnerable because it seems it doesn't store the cleartext -- it's encrypted with the client's OpenPGP public key -- so the TLS tunnel never sees the cleartext either. Other reports have also mentioned the following servers link against GnuTLS and could be vulnerable:
  • exim
  • rsyslog
  • samba
  • various VNC implementations

Not affected Those programs are not affected by this vulnerability:
  • apache2
  • gnupg
  • python
  • nginx
  • openssh
This list is not exhaustive, naturally, but serves as an example of common software you don't need to worry about. The vulnerability only exists in GnuTLS, as far as we know, so programs linking against other libraries are not vulnerable. Because the vulnerability affects session tickets -- and those are set on the server side of the TLS connection -- only users of GnuTLS as a server are vulnerable. This means, for example, that while weechat uses GnuTLS, it will only suffer from the problem when acting as a server (which it does, in relay mode) or, of course, if the remote IRC server also uses GnuTLS. Same with apt, curl, wget, or git: it is unlikely to be a problem because it is only used as a client; the remote server is usually a webserver -- not git itself -- when using TLS.

Caveats Keep in mind that it's not because a package links against GnuTLS that it uses it. For example, I have been told that, on Arch Linux, if both GnuTLS and OpenSSL are available, the mutt package will use the latter, so it's not affected. I haven't confirmed that myself nor have I checked on Debian. Also, because it relies on session tickets, there's a time window after which the ticket gets cycled and properly initialized. But that is apparently 6 hours by default so it is going to protect only really long-lasting TLS sessions, which are uncommon, I would argue. My audit is limited. For example, it might have been better to walk the shared library dependencies directly, instead of relying on Debian package dependencies.

Other technical details It seems the vulnerability might have been introduced in this merge request, itself following a (entirely reasonable) feature request to make it easier to rotate session tickets. The merge request was open for a few months and was thoroughly reviewed by a peer before being merged. Interestingly, the vulnerable function (_gnutls_initialize_session_ticket_key_rotation), explicitly says: 
 * This function will not enable session ticket keys on the server side. That is done
 * with the gnutls_session_ticket_enable_server() function. This function just initializes
 * the internal state to support periodical rotation of the session ticket encryption key.
In other words, it thinks it is not responsible for session ticket initialization, yet it is. Indeed, the merge request fixing the problem unconditionally does this: 
memcpy(session->key.initial_stek, key->data, key->size);
I haven't reviewed the code and the vulnerability in detail, so take the above with a grain of salt. The full patch is available here. See also the upstream issue 1011, the upstream advisory, the Debian security tracker, and the Redhat Bugzilla.

Moving forward The impact of this vulnerability depends on the affected packages and how they are used. It can range from "meh, someone knows I downloaded that Debian package yesterday" to "holy crap my full disk encryption passwords are compromised, I need to re-encrypt all my drives", including "I need to change all LDAP and MySQL passwords". It promises to be a fun week for some people at least. Looking ahead, however, one has to wonder whether we should follow @FiloSottile's advice and stop using GnuTLS altogether. There are at least a few programs that link against GnuTLS because of the OpenSSL licensing oddities but that has been first announced in 2015, then definitely and clearly resolved in 2017 -- or maybe that was in 2018? Anyways it's fixed, pinky-promise-I-swear, except if you're one of those weirdos still using GPL-2, of course. Even though OpenSSL isn't the simplest and secure TLS implementation out there, it could preferable to GnuTLS and maybe we should consider changing Debian packages to use it in the future. But then again, the last time something like this happened, it was Heartbleed and GnuTLS wasn't affected, so who knows... It is likely that people don't have OpenSSL in mind when they suggest moving away from GnuTLS and instead think of other TLS libraries like mbedtls (previously known as PolarSSL), NSS, BoringSSL, LibreSSL and so on. Not that those are totally sinless either... "This is fine", as they say...

10 June 2020

Evgeni Golov: show your desk

Some days ago I posted a picture of my desk on Mastodon and Twitter. standing desk with a monitor, laptop etc After that I got multiple questions about the setup, so I thought "Michael and Michael did posts about their setups, you could too!" And well, here we are ;-) desk The desk is a Flexispot E5B frame with a 200 80 2.6cm oak table top. The Flexispot E5 (the B stands for black) is a rather cheap (as in not expensive) standing desk frame. It has a retail price of 379 , but you can often get it as low as 299 on sale. Add a nice table top from a local store (mine was like 99 ), a bit of wood oil and work and you get a nice standing desk for less than 500 . The frame has three memory positions, but I only use two: one for sitting, one for standing, and a "change position" timer that I never used so far. The table top has a bit of a swing when in standing position (mine is at 104cm according to the electronics in the table), but not enough to disturb typing on the keyboard or thinking. I certainly wouldn't place a sewing machine up there, but that was not a requirement anyways ;) To compare: the IKEA Bekant table has a similar, maybe even slightly stronger swing. chair Speaking of IKEA The chair is an IKEA Volmar. They don't seem to sell it since mid 2019 anymore though, so no link here. hardware laptop A Lenovo ThinkPad T480s, i7-8650U, 24GB RAM, running Fedora 32 Workstation. Just enough power while not too big and heavy. Full of stickers, because I stickers! It's connected to a Lenovo ThinkPad Thunderbolt 3 Dock (Gen 1). After 2 years with that thing, I'm still not sure what to think about it, as I had various issues with it over the time:
  • the internal USB hub just vanishing from existence until a full power cycle of the dock was performed, but that might have been caused by my USB-switch which I recently removed.
  • the NIC negotiating at 100MBit/s instead of 1000MBit/s and then keeping on re-negotiating every few minutes, disconnecting me from the network, but I've not seen that since the Fedora 32 upgrade.
  • the USB-attached keyboard not working during boot as it needs some Thunderbolt magic.
The ThinkPad stands on a Adam Hall Stands SLT001E, a rather simple stand for laptops and other equipment (primarily made for DJs I think). The Dock fits exactly between the two feet of the stand, so that is nice and saves space on the table. Using the stand I can use the laptop screen as a second screen when I want it - but most often I do not and have the laptop lid closed while working. workstation A Lenovo ThinkStation P410, Xeon E5-2620 v4, 96GB RAM, running Fedora 32 Workstation. That's my VM playground. Having lots of RAM really helps if you need/want to run many VMs with Foreman/Katello or Red Hat Satellite as they tend to be a bit memory hungry and throwing hardware at problems tend to be an easy solution for many of them. The ThinkStation is also connected to the monitor, and I used to have an USB switch to flip my keyboard, mouse and Yubikey from the laptop to the workstation and back. But as noted above, this switch somehow made the USB hub in the laptop dock unhappy (maybe because I was switching too quickly after resume or so), so it's currently removed from the setup and I use the workstation via SSH only. It's mounted under the table using a ROLINE PC holder. You won't get any design awards with it, but it's easy to assemble and allows the computer to move with the table, minimizing the number of cables that need to have a flexible length. monitor The monitor is an older Dell UltraSharp U2515H - a 25" 2560 1440 model. It sits on an Amazon Basics Monitor Arm (which is identical to an Ergotron LX to the best of my knowledge) and is accompanied by a Dell AC511 soundbar. I don't use the adjustable arm much. It's from the time I had no real standing desk and would use the arm and a cardboard box to lift the monitor and keyboard to a standing level. If you don't want to invest in a standing desk, that's the best and cheapest solution! The soundbar is sufficient for listening to music while working and for chatting with colleagues. webcam A Logitech C920 Pro, what else? Works perfectly under Linux with the UVC driver and has rather good microphones. Actually, so good that I never use a headset during video calls and so far nobody complained about bad audio. keyboard A ThinkPad Compact USB Keyboard with TrackPoint. The keyboard matches the one in my T480s, so my brain doesn't have to switch. It was awful when I still had the "old" model and had to switch between the two. UK layout. Sue me. I like the big return key. mouse A Logitech MX Master 2. I got the MX Revolution as a gift a long time ago, and at first I was like: WTF, why would anyone pay hundred bucks for a mouse?! Well, after some time I knew, it's just that good. And when it was time to get a new one (the rubber coating gets all slippery after some time) the decision was rather easy. I'm pondering if I should try the MX Ergo or the MX Vertical at some point, but not enough to go and buy one of them yet. other notepad I'm terrible at remembering things, so I need to write them down. And I'm terrible at remembering to look at my notes, so they need to be in my view. So there is a regular A5 notepad on my desk, that gets filled with check boxes and stuff, page after page. coaster It's a wooden table, you don't want to have liquids on it, right? Thankfully a friend of mine once made coasters out of old Xeon CPUs and epoxy. He gave me one in exchange for a busted X41 ThinkPad. I still think I made the better deal ;) yubikey Keep your secrets safe! Mine is used as a GnuPG smart card for both encryption and SSH authentication, U2F on various pages and 2FA for VPN. headphones I own a pair of Bose QuietComfort 25 with an aftermarket Bluetooth adapter and Anker SoundBuds Slim+. Both are used rather seldomly while working, as my office is usually quiet and no one is disturbed when I listen to music without headphones. what's missing? light I want to add more light to the setup, noth to have a better picture during video calls but also to have better light when doing something else on the table - like soldering. The plan is to add an IKEA Tertial with some Tr dfri smart LED in it, but the Tertial is currently not available for delivery at IKEA and I'm not going to visit one in the current situation. bigger monitor Currently pondering getting a bigger (27+ inch) 4K monitor. Still can't really decide which one to get. There are so many, and they all differ in some way. But it seems no affordable one is offering an integrated USB switch and sufficient amount of USB ports, so I'll probably get whatever can get me a good picture without any extra features at a reasonable price. Changing the monitor will probably also mean rethinking the sound output, as I'm sure mounting the Dell soundbar to anything but the designated 5 year old monitor won't work too well.

9 June 2020

Ingo Juergensmann: Jabber vs. XMPP

XMPP is widely - and mabye better - known as Jabber. This was more or less the same until Cisco bought Jabber Inc and the trademark. You can read more about the story on the XMPP.org website. But is there still a Jabber around? Yes, it is! But Cisco Jabber is a whole infrastructure environment: you can't use Cisco Jabber client on its own without the other required Cisco infrastructure as Cisco CUCM and CIsco IM&P servers. So you can't just setup Prosody or ejabberd on your Debian server and connect Cisco Jabber to it. But what are the differences of Cisco Jabber to "standard" XMPP clients? Cisco Jabber The above screenshot from the official Cisco Jabber product webpage shows the new, single view layout of the Cisco Webex Teams client, but you can configure the client to have the old, classic split view layout of Contact List and Chat Window. But as you can already see from above screenshot audio & video calls is one of the core functions of Cisco Jabber whereas this feature has been added only lately to the well-known Conversations XMPP client on Android. Conversations is using Jingle extension to XMPP whereas Jabber uses SIP for voice/video calls. You can even use Cisco Jabber to control your deskphone via CTI, which is a quite common setup for Jabber. In fact you can configure Jabber to be just a CTI client to you phone or a fully featured UC client. When you don't want to have Ciscos full set of on-premise servers, you can also use Cisco Jabber in conjunction with Cisco Webex as Cisco Webex Messenger. Or in conjunction with Webex Teams in Teams Messaging Mode. Last month Cisco announced general availability of XMPP federation for Webex Teams/Jabber in Teams Messaging Mode. With that you have basic functionality in Webex Teams. And when I say "basic" I really mean basic: you can have 1:1 chat only, no group chats (MUC) and no Presence status will be possible. Hopefully this is just the beginning and not the end of XMPP support in Webex Teams. XMPP Clients Well, I'm sure many of you know "normal" XMPP clients such as Gajim or Dino on Linux, Conversations on Android or Siskin/Monal/ChatSecure on Apple IOS. There are plenty of other clients of course and maybe you used an XMPP client in the past without knowing it. For example Jitsi Meet is based on XMPP and you can still download the Jitsi Desktop client and use it as a full-featured multi-protocol client, e.g. for XMPP and SIP. In fact Jitsi Desktop is maybe the client that comes closest to Cisco Jabber as a chat/voice/video client. In fact I already connected Jitsi Desktop to Cisco CUCM/IM&P infrastructure, but of course you won't be able to use all those Cisco proprietary extensions, but you can see the benefit of open, standardized protocols such as XMPP and SIP: you are free to use any standard compliant client that you want. So, while Jitsi supported voice/video calls for a long time, even before they focussed on Jitsi Meet as a WebRTC based conference service, Conversations added this feature last month, as already stated. This had a huge effect to the whole XMPP federation, because you need an XMPP server that supports XEP-0215 to make these audio/video calls work. The well-known Compliance Tester listed the STUN/TURN features first as "Informational Tests", but quickly made this a mandatory test to pass tests and gain 100% on the Compliance Tester. But you cannot place SIP calls to other sides, because that's a different thing. As many of you are familiar with standard XMPP clients, I'll focus now on some similarity and differences between Cisco Jabber and standard XMPP... Similarities & Differences First, you can federate with Cisco Jabber users. Cisco IM&P can use standard XMPP federation with all other XMPP standard compliant servers. This is really a big benefit and way better than other solutions that usually results in vendor lock-in. Depending on the setup, you can even join from your own XMPP client in MUCs (Multi User Chats), which Cisco calls "Persistent Chat Room". The other way is not that simple: basically it is possible to join with Cisco Jabber in a MUC on a random server, but it is not as easy as you might thing. Cisco Jabber simply lacks a way to enter a room JID (as you can find them on https://search.jabber.network/. Instead you need to be added as participant by a moderator or an admin in that 3rd party MUC. Managed File Transfers is another issue. Cisco Jabber supports Peer-to-Peer file transfers and Managed File Transfers, where the uploaded file get transferred to an SFTP server as storage backend and where the IM&P server is handling the transfer via HTTPS. You can find a schematic drawing in the Configuration Guides. Although it appears similar to HTTP Upload as defined in XEP-0363, it is not very likely that it will work. I haven't tested it yet, because in my test scenario there is a gatekeeper in the path: Cisco Expressway doesn't support (yet) Managed File Transfer, but you can upvote the idea in the ideas management of Cisco or other ideas such as OMEMO support. OMEMO support? Yes, there is no end-to-end encryption (E2EE) currently planned for Cisco Jabber, while it is common nowadays for most modern XMPP clients. I think it would be good for Cisco Jabber to also (optionally) support OMEMO or its successor. Messaging clients without E2EE are not state of the art anymore. Whereas Conversations is the de-facto standard on Android, Apple IOS devices are still lacking a similar well-working client. See my blog post "XMPP - Fun with Clients" for a summary. In that regard Cisco Jabber might be the best XMPP client for IOS to some degree: you have working messaging, voice/video calls, Push Notifications and integration into Apples Call Kit. There are most likely many, many more differences and issues between Cisco Jabber and standard compliant XMPP servers and clients. But basically Cisco Jabber is still based on XMPP and extends that by proprietary extensions. Summary While I have the impression that the free clients and servers are well doing and increased development in the past years (thanks to Conversations and the Compliance Tester), the situation of Cisco Jabber is a little different. As a customer you can sometimes get the impression that Cisco has lost interest in developing Cisco Jabber. It got better in the last years, but when Cisco Spark was introduced some years ago, the impression was that Cisco is heavily focussed on Spark (now: Webex Teams). It's not like Cisco is not listening to customers or the development has been stopped on Jabber, but my impression is that most customers don't give feedback or tell Cisco as the vendor what they want. You can either submit ideas via the Colaboration Customer Ideas Tool or provide feedback via your Cisco and partner channels. I think it is important for the XMPP community to also have a large enterprise level vendor like Cisco. Otherwise the Internet will become more and more an Internet of closed silos like MS Teams, Slack, Facebook, etc. Of course there are other companies like ProcessOne (ejabberd) or Tigase, but I think you agree that Cisco is another level.
Kategorie:
Debian
Tags:
Debian
Jabber
XMPP

7 June 2020

Joachim Breitner: Managed by an eleven year old

This weekend I had some pretty good uncle time. My eleven year old nephew (after beating me in a fair match of tennis) wanted to play with his Lego Mindstorms set. He never even touches it unless I am around to help him, but then he quiet enjoys. As expected, when I ask him what we should try to build, he tends to come up with completely unrealistic or impossible ideas, and we have to somehow reduce the scope to something doable. This time round, inspired by their autonomous vacuum cleaner, he wanted to build something like that. That was convenient, because now I could sell him what I wanted to try to do, namely make the robot follow a wall at more or less constant distance, as a useful first step. We mounted the infra red distance sensor at an 45 angle to the front-left, and then I built a very simple control loop measure the distance, subtract 40, apply a factor, and feed that into the steering input of the drive action, and repeat. I must admit that I was pretty proud to see just how well that very simple circuit worked: The little robot turned sharp corners in both directions, and otherwise drove nicely parallel and with constant distance to the wall. I was satisfied with that achievement and would have happily ended it here before we might be disappointed by more ambitious and then failing goals. But my nephew had not forgotten about the vacuum cleaner, and casually asked if I could make the robot draw an outline of its path, and thus of the room, on the display. Ok, where do I begin to explain just how unfeasible that is yes, it seemed one can draw to the display. But how should the robot know where it is? How far it turns? How far it went? This is programming by connecting boxes, and I would not expect such an interface to allow for complex logic (right?). And I would need trigonometry and stuff. But he didn t quite believe it, and thus got me thinking indeed, the arithmetic block can evaluate more complex formulas, involving sin and cos so maybe if I can somehow keep track of where the robot is heading well, let s give it a try. So by dragging boxes and connecting wires, I implemented a simple logic (three variables, x and y for current position, alpha for current heading; in each loop add the steering input onto alpha, and add (sin(alpha),cos(alpha)) onto the current position; throw in some linear factors to calibrate; draw pixel at (x, y)). And, to my nephew s joy and my astonishment, the robot was drawing a curvy line that clearly correlates with the taken path! It wasn t respecting the angles perfectly, a square might not properly close, but half an hour earlier I would have actively bet against that we would pull this off!
After a few turns

After a few turns

I was, I must admit, a bit proud. But not only about the technical nerding, but also about my uncleing: That night, according to his parents, my nephew said that he can t remember ever being so happy!

4 June 2020

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in May 2020

Welcome to the May 2020 report from the Reproducible Builds project. One of the original promises of open source software is that distributed peer review and transparency of process results in enhanced end-user security. Nonetheless, whilst anyone may inspect the source code of free and open source software for malicious flaws, almost all software today is distributed as pre-compiled binaries. This allows nefarious third-parties to compromise systems by injecting malicious code into seemingly secure software during the various compilation and distribution processes. In these reports we outline the most important things that we and the rest of the community have been up to over the past month.

News The Corona-Warn app that helps trace infection chains of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 in Germany had a feature request filed against it that it build reproducibly. A number of academics from Cornell University have published a paper titled Backstabber s Knife Collection which reviews various open source software supply chain attacks:
Recent years saw a number of supply chain attacks that leverage the increasing use of open source during software development, which is facilitated by dependency managers that automatically resolve, download and install hundreds of open source packages throughout the software life cycle.
In related news, the LineageOS Android distribution announced that a hacker had access to the infrastructure of their servers after exploiting an unpatched vulnerability. Marcin Jachymiak of the Sia decentralised cloud storage platform posted on their blog that their siac and siad utilities can now be built reproducibly:
This means that anyone can recreate the same binaries produced from our official release process. Now anyone can verify that the release binaries were created using the source code we say they were created from. No single person or computer needs to be trusted when producing the binaries now, which greatly reduces the attack surface for Sia users.
Synchronicity is a distributed build system for Rust build artifacts which have been published to crates.io. The goal of Synchronicity is to provide a distributed binary transparency system which is independent of any central operator. The Comparison of Linux distributions article on Wikipedia now features a Reproducible Builds column indicating whether distributions approach and progress towards achieving reproducible builds.

Distribution work In Debian this month: In Alpine Linux, an issue was filed and closed regarding the reproducibility of .apk packages. Allan McRae of the ArchLinux project posted their third Reproducible builds progress report to the arch-dev-public mailing list which includes the following call for help:
We also need help to investigate and fix the packages that fail to reproduce that we have not investigated as of yet.
In openSUSE, Bernhard M. Wiedemann published his monthly Reproducible Builds status update.

Software development

diffoscope Chris Lamb made the changes listed below to diffoscope, our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. He also prepared and uploaded versions 142, 143, 144, 145 and 146 to Debian, PyPI, etc.
  • Comparison improvements:
    • Improve fuzzy matching of JSON files as file now supports recognising JSON data. (#106)
    • Refactor .changes and .buildinfo handling to show all details (including the GnuPG header and footer components) even when referenced files are not present. (#122)
    • Use our BuildinfoFile comparator (etc.) regardless of whether the associated files (such as the orig.tar.gz and the .deb) are present. [ ]
    • Include GnuPG signature data when comparing .buildinfo, .changes, etc. [ ]
    • Add support for printing Android APK signatures via apksigner(1). (#121)
    • Identify iOS App Zip archive data as .zip files. (#116)
    • Add support for Apple Xcode .mobilepovision files. (#113)
  • Bug fixes:
    • Don t print a traceback if we pass a single, missing argument to diffoscope (eg. a JSON diff to re-load). [ ]
    • Correct differences typo in the ApkFile handler. (#127)
  • Output improvements:
    • Never emit the same id="foo" anchor reference twice in the HTML output, otherwise identically-named parts will not be able to linked to via a #foo anchor. (#120)
    • Never emit an empty id anchor either; it is not possible to link to #. [ ]
    • Don t pretty-print the output when using the --json presenter; it will usually be too complicated to be readable by the human anyway. [ ]
    • Use the SHA256 over MD5 hash when generating page names for the HTML directory-style presenter. (#124)
  • Reporting improvements:
    • Clarify the message when we truncate the number of lines to standard error [ ] and reduce the number of maximum lines printed to 25 as usually the error is obvious by then [ ].
    • Print the amount of free space that we have available in our temporary directory as a debugging message. [ ]
    • Clarify Command [ ] failed with exit code messages to remove duplicate exited with exit but also to note that diffoscope is interpreting this as an error. [ ]
    • Don t leak the full path of the temporary directory in Command [ ] exited with 1 messages. (#126)
    • Clarify the warning message when we cannot import the debian Python module. [ ]
    • Don t repeat stderr from if both commands emit the same output. [ ]
    • Clarify that an external command emits for both files, otherwise it can look like we are repeating itself when, in reality, it is being run twice. [ ]
  • Testsuite improvements:
    • Prevent apksigner test failures due to lack of binfmt_misc, eg. on Salsa CI and elsewhere. [ ]
    • Drop .travis.yml as we use Salsa instead. [ ]
  • Dockerfile improvements:
    • Add a .dockerignore file to whitelist files we actually need in our container. (#105)
    • Use ARG instead of ENV when setting up the DEBIAN_FRONTEND environment variable at runtime. (#103)
    • Run as a non-root user in container. (#102)
    • Install/remove the build-essential during build so we can install the recommended packages from Git. [ ]
  • Codebase improvements:
    • Bump the officially required version of Python from 3.5 to 3.6. (#117)
    • Drop the (default) shell=False keyword argument to subprocess.Popen so that the potentially-unsafe shell=True is more obvious. [ ]
    • Perform string normalisation in Black [ ] and include the Black output in the assertion failure too [ ].
    • Inline MissingFile s special handling of deb822 to prevent leaking through abstract layers. [ ][ ]
    • Allow a bare try/except block when cleaning up temporary files with respect to the flake8 quality assurance tool. [ ]
    • Rename in_dsc_path to dsc_in_same_dir to clarify the use of this variable. [ ]
    • Abstract out the duplicated parts of the debian_fallback class [ ] and add descriptions for the file types. [ ]
    • Various commenting and internal documentation improvements. [ ][ ]
    • Rename the Openssl command class to OpenSSLPKCS7 to accommodate other command names with this prefix. [ ]
  • Misc:
    • Rename the --debugger command-line argument to --pdb. [ ]
    • Normalise filesystem stat(2) birth times (ie. st_birthtime) in the same way we do with the stat(1) command s Access: and Change: times to fix a nondeterministic build failure in GNU Guix. (#74)
    • Ignore case when ordering our file format descriptions. [ ]
    • Drop, add and tidy various module imports. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
In addition:
  • Jean-Romain Garnier fixed a general issue where, for example, LibarchiveMember s has_same_content method was called regardless of the underlying type of file. [ ]
  • Daniel Fullmer fixed an issue where some filesystems could only be mounted read-only. (!49)
  • Emanuel Bronshtein provided a patch to prevent a build of the Docker image containing parts of the build s. (#123)
  • Mattia Rizzolo added an entry to debian/py3dist-overrides to ensure the rpm-python module is used in package dependencies (#89) and moved to using the new execute_after_* and execute_before_* Debhelper rules [ ].

Chris Lamb also performed a huge overhaul of diffoscope s website:
  • Add a completely new design. [ ][ ]
  • Dynamically generate our contributor list [ ] and supported file formats [ ] from the main Git repository.
  • Add a separate, canonical page for every new release. [ ][ ][ ]
  • Generate a latest release section and display that with the corresponding date on the homepage. [ ]
  • Add an RSS feed of our releases [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ] and add to Planet Debian [ ].
  • Use Jekyll s absolute_url and relative_url where possible [ ][ ] and move a number of configuration variables to _config.yml [ ][ ].

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

Other tools Elsewhere in our tooling: strip-nondeterminism is our tool to remove specific non-deterministic results from a completed build. In May, Chris Lamb uploaded version 1.8.1-1 to Debian unstable and Bernhard M. Wiedemann fixed an off-by-one error when parsing PNG image modification times. (#16) In disorderfs, our FUSE-based filesystem that deliberately introduces non-determinism into directory system calls in order to flush out reproducibility issues, Chris Lamb replaced the term dirents in place of directory entries in human-readable output/log messages [ ] and used the astyle source code formatter with the default settings to the main disorderfs.cpp source file [ ]. Holger Levsen bumped the debhelper-compat level to 13 in disorderfs [ ] and reprotest [ ], and for the GNU Guix distribution Vagrant Cascadian updated the versions of disorderfs to version 0.5.10 [ ] and diffoscope to version 145 [ ].

Project documentation & website
  • Carl Dong:
  • Chris Lamb:
    • Rename the Who page to Projects . [ ]
    • Ensure that Jekyll enters the _docs subdirectory to find the _docs/index.md file after an internal move. (#27)
    • Wrap ltmain.sh etc. in preformatted quotes. [ ]
    • Wrap the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Python examples onto more lines to prevent visual overflow on the page. [ ]
    • Correct a preferred spelling error. [ ]
  • Holger Levsen:
    • Sort our Academic publications page by publication year [ ] and add Trusting Trust and Fully Countering Trusting Trust through Diverse Double-Compiling [ ].
  • Juri Dispan:

Testing framework We operate a large and many-featured Jenkins-based testing framework that powers tests.reproducible-builds.org that, amongst many other tasks, tracks the status of our reproducibility efforts as well as identifies any regressions that have been introduced. Holger Levsen made the following changes:
  • System health status:
    • Improve page description. [ ]
    • Add more weight to proxy failures. [ ]
    • More verbose debug/failure messages. [ ][ ][ ]
    • Work around strangeness in the Bash shell let VARIABLE=0 exits with an error. [ ]
  • Debian:
    • Fail loudly if there are more than three .buildinfo files with the same name. [ ]
    • Fix a typo which prevented /usr merge variation on Debian unstable. [ ]
    • Temporarily ignore PHP s horde](https://www.horde.org/) packages in Debian bullseye. [ ]
    • Document how to reboot all nodes in parallel, working around molly-guard. [ ]
  • Further work on a Debian package rebuilder:
    • Workaround and document various issues in the debrebuild script. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Improve output in the case of errors. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Improve documentation and future goals [ ][ ][ ][ ], in particular documentiing two real world tests case for an impossible to recreate build environment [ ].
    • Find the right source package to rebuild. [ ]
    • Increase the frequency we run the script. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Improve downloading and selection of the sources to build. [ ][ ][ ]
    • Improve version string handling.. [ ]
    • Handle build failures better. [ ]. [ ]. [ ]
    • Also consider architecture all .buildinfo files. [ ][ ]
In addition:
  • kpcyrd, for Alpine Linux, updated the alpine_schroot.sh script now that a patch for abuild had been released upstream. [ ]
  • Alexander Couzens of the OpenWrt project renamed the brcm47xx target to bcm47xx. [ ]
  • Mattia Rizzolo fixed the printing of the build environment during the second build [ ][ ][ ] and made a number of improvements to the script that deploys Jenkins across our infrastructure [ ][ ][ ].
Lastly, Vagrant Cascadian clarified in the documentation that you need to be user jenkins to run the blacklist command [ ] and the usual build node maintenance was performed was performed by Holger Levsen [ ][ ][ ], Mattia Rizzolo [ ][ ] and Vagrant Cascadian [ ][ ][ ].

Mailing list: There were a number of discussions on our mailing list this month: Paul Spooren started a thread titled Reproducible Builds Verification Format which reopens the discussion around a schema for sharing the results from distributed rebuilders:
To make the results accessible, storable and create tools around them, they should all follow the same schema, a reproducible builds verification format. The format tries to be as generic as possible to cover all open source projects offering precompiled source code. It stores the rebuilder results of what is reproducible and what not.
Hans-Christoph Steiner of the Guardian Project also continued his previous discussion regarding making our website translatable. Lastly, Leo Wandersleb posted a detailed request for feedback on a question of supply chain security and other issues of software review; Leo is the founder of the Wallet Scrutiny project which aims to prove the security of Android Bitcoin Wallets:
Do you own your Bitcoins or do you trust that your app allows you to use your coins while they are actually controlled by them ? Do you have a backup? Do they have a copy they didn t tell you about? Did anybody check the wallet for deliberate backdoors or vulnerabilities? Could anybody check the wallet for those?
Elsewhere, Leo had posted instructions on his attempts to reproduce the binaries for the BlueWallet Bitcoin wallet for iOS and Android platforms.

If you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

This month s report was written by Bernhard M. Wiedemann, Chris Lamb, Holger Levsen, Jelle van der Waa and Vagrant Cascadian. It was subsequently reviewed by a bunch of Reproducible Builds folks on IRC and the mailing list.

3 June 2020

Jonathan Dowland: using Template Haskell to generate boilerplate

Here's a practical example of applying Template Haskell to reduce the amount of boilerplate code that is otherwise required. I wrote the below after following this excellent blog post by Matt Parsons. This post will be much higher-level, read Matt's blog for the gorier details. Liquorice Liquorice is a toy project of mine from a few years ago that lets you draw 2D geometric structures similar to LOGO. Liquorice offers two interfaces: pure functions that operate on an explicit Context (the pen location: existing lines, etc.), and a second "stateful" interface where the input and output are handled in the background. I prefix the pure ones P. and the stateful ones S. in this blog post for clarity. The stateful interface can be much nicer to use for larger drawings. Compare example8b.hs, written in terms of the pure functions, and the stateful equivalent example8.hs. The majority of the stateful functions are "wrapped" versions of the pure functions. For example, the pure function P.step takes two numbers and moves the pen forward and sideways. Its type signature is 
P.step :: Int -> Int -> Context -> Context
Here's the signature and implementation of the stateful equivalent: 
S.step :: Int -> Int -> State Context ()
S.step x y = modify (P.step x y)
Writing these wrapped functions for the 29 pure functions is boilerplate that can be generated automatically with Template Haskell. Generating the wrapper functions Given the Name of a function to wrap, we construct an instance of FunD, the TH data-type representing a function definition. We use the base name of the incoming function as the name for the new one. 
mkWrap fn = do
     
    let name = mkName (nameBase fn)
    return $ FunD name [ Clause (map VarP args) (NormalB rhs) [] ]
To determine how many arguments the wrapper function needs to accept, we need to determine the input function's arity. We use Template Haskell's reify function to get type information about the function, and derive the arity from that. Matt Parson's covers this exactly in his blog. 
info    <- reify fn
let ty   = (\(VarI _ t _ ) -> t) info
let n    = arity ty - 1
args    <- replicateM n (newName "arg")
We can use the list "args" directly in the clause part of the function definition, as the data-type expects a list. For the right-hand side, we need to convert from a list of arguments to function application. That's a simple left-fold: 
-- mkFnApp f [a,b,c] => ((f a) b) c => f a b c
mkFnApp = foldl (\e -> appE e . varE)
rhs     <- [  modify $(mkFnApp (varE fn) args) :: State Context ()  ]
We use TH's oxford brackets for the definition of rhs. This permits us to write real Haskell inside the brackets, and get an expression data-type outside them. Within we have a splice (the $( )), which does the opposite: the code is evaluated at compile time and generates an Exp that is then converted into the equivalent Haskell code and spliced into place. Finally, we need to apply the above to a list of Names. Sadly, we can't get at the list of exported names from a Module automatically. There is an open request for a TH extension for this. In the meantime, we export a list of the functions to wrap from the Pure module and operate on that 
import Liquorice.Pure
wrapPureFunctions = mapM mkWrap pureFns
Finally, we 'call' wrapPureFunctions at the top level in our state module and Template Haskell splices all the function definitions into place. The final code ended up only around 30 lines of code, and saved about the same number of lines of boilerplate. But in doing this I noticed some missing functions, and it will pay dividends if more pure functions are added. Limitations The current implementation has one significant limitation: it cannot handle higher-order functions. An example of a pure higher-order function is place, which moves the pen, performs an operation, and then moves it back: 
P.place :: Int -> Int -> (Context -> Context) -> Context -> Context
Wrapping this is not sufficient because the higher-order parameter has the pure function signature Context -> Context. If we wrapped it, the stateful version of the function would accept a pure function as the parameter, but you would expect it to accept another stateful function. To handle these, at a minimum we would need to detect the function arguments that have type Context -> Context and replace them with State Context (). The right-hand side of the wrapped function would also need to do more work to handle wrapping and unwrapping the parameter. I haven't spent much time thinking about it but I'm not sure that a general purpose wrapper would work for all higher-order functions. For the time being I've just re-implemented the half-dozen of them.

Andy Simpkins: Getting Co-ap tools working on Debian

At work we have a wonderful pyhon tool that we are able to send CoAP messages to and from our products. Perfect for development work. However recently I needed to install a copy of the tools onto my personal laptop because the only work laptops I have access to have completely dead batteries and so are not suitable for taking out into a field to perform RF range tests .

As a company we have chosen not to package internal development tools I think that this is a mistake, but this is not my decision. So I simply copied across the coap tools directory and tried to run them. Obviously nothing worked! However, the error messages were enough to work out what dependencies I needed to resolve. Error #1 Missing libasan.so.2 shared library
By a process of deduction we found that gcc5 contains libasan2, quite old.
Debian s snapshots was our saviour here: 
wget http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20180412T100152Z/pool/main/g/gcc-5/libasan2_5.5.0-12_amd64.deb

wget http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20180412T100152Z/pool/main/g/gcc-5/gcc-5-base_5.5.0-12_amd64.deb

dpkg -i ./gcc-5-base_5.5.0-12_amd64.deb ./libasan2_5.5.0-12_amd64.deb

great that was enough to get the port bindings to work
Error #2 google.protobuf When I tried to issue coap requests I ran into missing python3 imports google.protobuf fortunately this is found packaged in Debian buster as party of python3-protobuf 
apt-get install python3-protobuf
Done! everything works :-)

2 June 2020

Olivier Berger: Mixing NRELab s Antidote and Eclipse Che on the same k8s cluster

You may have heard of my search for Cloud solutions to run labs in an academic context, with a focus on free an open source solutions . You may read previous installments of this blog, or for a shorter, check the presentation I ve recorded last week. I ve become quite interested, in the latest month, in 2 projects: NRELab s Antidote and Eclipse Che. Antidote is the software that powers NRELabs, a labs platform for learning network automation, which runs on top of Kubernetes (k8s). The interesting thing is that for each learner, there can be a dedicated k8s namespace with multiple virtual nodes running on a separate network. This can be used in the context of virtual classes/labs where our students will perform network labs in parallel on the same cluster. Eclipse Che powers Eclipse on the Cloud , making available software development environments, for developers, on a Kubernetes Cloud. Developers typically work from a Web page instead of installing local development tools. Both projects seem quite complementary. For one, we both teach networks and software developments. So that would naturally appeal for many professors. Furthermore, Eclipse Che provides a few features that Antidote is lacking : authenticating users (with keycloak), and persisting their work in workspaces, between work sessions. Typically what we need in our academic context where students will work on the same labs during scheduled classes, week after week, during or off-hours. Thus it would be great to have more integration between the 2 environments. I intend to work on that front, but that takes time, as running stuff on Kubernetes isn t exactly trivial, at least when you re like me and want to use a vanilla kubernetes. I ve mainly relied on running k8s inside VMs using Vagrant and/or minikube so far. A first milestone I ve achieved is making sure that Antidote and Eclipse Che aren t incompatible. Antidote s selfmedicate script was actually running inside a Vagrant VM, where I had difficulties installing Eclipse Che (probably because of old software, or particular networking setup details). I ve overcome this hurdle, as I m now able to install both environments on a single Kubernetes VM (using my own Vagrant setup). Running Eclipse Che (alongsite Antidote) on a k8s Vagrant VM. This proves only that there s no show stopper there, but a lot of work remains. Stay tuned. Update: I ve finally managed to get it to work on the antidote-selfmedicate base too. See my branch at: https://github.com/olberger/antidote-selfmedicate/tree/che

Next.

Previous.