Reproducible Builds: ARDC sponsors the Reproducible Builds project
The Reproducible Builds project is pleased to announce a donation from
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) in support
of its goals. ARDC s contribution will propel the Reproducible Builds
project s efforts in ensuring the future health, security and sustainability of
our increasingly digital society.
About Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
About Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) is a
non-profit that was formed to further research and experimentation with digital
communications using radio, with a goal of advancing the state of the art of
amateur radio and to educate radio operators in these techniques.
It does this by managing the allocation of network resources, encouraging
research and experimentation with networking protocols and equipment,
publishing technical articles and number of other activities to promote the
public good of amateur radio and other related fields. ARDC has recently begun
to contribute funding to organisations, groups, individuals and projects
towards these and related goals, and their grant to the Reproducible Builds
project is part of this new initiative.
Amateur radio is an entirely volunteer activity performed by knowledgeable
hobbyists who have proven their ability by passing the appropriate government
examinations. No remuneration is permitted. Ham radio, as it is also known,
has proven its value in advancements of the state of the communications arts,
as well as in public service during disasters and in times of emergency.
For more information about ARDC, please see their website at
ampr.org.
About the Reproducible Builds project
One of the original promises of open source software was that peer review would
result in greater end-user security and stability of our digital ecosystem.
However, although it is theoretically possible to inspect and build the
original source code in order to avoid maliciously-inserted flaws, almost all
software today is distributed in prepackaged form.
This disconnect allows third-parties to compromise systems by injecting code
into seemingly secure software during the build process, as well as by
manipulating copies distributed from app stores and other package repositories.
In order to address this, Reproducible builds are a set of software
development practices, ideas and tools that create an independently-verifiable
path from the original source code, all the way to what is actually running on
our machines. Reproducible builds can reveal the injection of backdoors
introduced by the hacking of developers own computers, build servers and
package repositories, but can also expose where volunteers or companies have
been coerced into making changes via blackmail, government order, and so on.
A world without reproducible builds is a world where our digital infrastructure
cannot be trusted and where online communities are slower to grow, collaborate
less and are increasingly fragile. Without reproducible builds, we leave space
for greater encroachments on our liberties both by individuals as well as
powerful, unaccountable actors such as governments, large corporations and
autocratic regimes.
The Reproducible Builds project began as a project within the Debian community,
but is now working with many crucial and well-known free software projects such
as Coreboot, openSUSE, OpenWrt, Tails, GNU Guix, Arch Linux, Tor, and many
others. It is now an entirely Linux distribution independent effort and serves
as the central clearing house for all issues related to securing build
systems and software supply chains of all kinds.
For more about the Reproducible Builds project, please see their website at
reproducible-builds.org.
If you are interested in ensuring the ongoing security of the software that
underpins our civilisation, and wish to sponsor the Reproducible Builds
project, please reach out to the project by emailing
contact@reproducible-builds.org.
One of the original promises of open source software was that peer review would
result in greater end-user security and stability of our digital ecosystem.
However, although it is theoretically possible to inspect and build the
original source code in order to avoid maliciously-inserted flaws, almost all
software today is distributed in prepackaged form.
This disconnect allows third-parties to compromise systems by injecting code
into seemingly secure software during the build process, as well as by
manipulating copies distributed from app stores and other package repositories.
In order to address this, Reproducible builds are a set of software
development practices, ideas and tools that create an independently-verifiable
path from the original source code, all the way to what is actually running on
our machines. Reproducible builds can reveal the injection of backdoors
introduced by the hacking of developers own computers, build servers and
package repositories, but can also expose where volunteers or companies have
been coerced into making changes via blackmail, government order, and so on.
A world without reproducible builds is a world where our digital infrastructure
cannot be trusted and where online communities are slower to grow, collaborate
less and are increasingly fragile. Without reproducible builds, we leave space
for greater encroachments on our liberties both by individuals as well as
powerful, unaccountable actors such as governments, large corporations and
autocratic regimes.
The Reproducible Builds project began as a project within the Debian community,
but is now working with many crucial and well-known free software projects such
as Coreboot, openSUSE, OpenWrt, Tails, GNU Guix, Arch Linux, Tor, and many
others. It is now an entirely Linux distribution independent effort and serves
as the central clearing house for all issues related to securing build
systems and software supply chains of all kinds.
For more about the Reproducible Builds project, please see their website at
reproducible-builds.org.
If you are interested in ensuring the ongoing security of the software that underpins our civilisation, and wish to sponsor the Reproducible Builds project, please reach out to the project by emailing contact@reproducible-builds.org.
Following up on the
I have been late to adopt an on-premise cloud solution as the security of Owncloud a few years ago wasn't so stellar (cf. my comment from 2013 in
Luckily code can be changed and there are many comments floating around the Internet to change
Welcome to gambaru.de. Here is my monthly report (+ the first week in September) that covers what I have been doing for Debian. If you re interested in Java, Games and LTS topics, this might be interesting for you.
Debian Games

I'm happy to announce I handed out my Master's Thesis last Monday. I'm not
publishing the final copy just yet










To ensure
In May, I got selected as a
Here is another monthly update covering what I have been doing in the free software world during August 2020 (

DebConf20 is taking place online, from 23 August to 29 August 2020.
It is the 21st Debian conference, and organizers and participants are working hard
together at creating interesting and fruitful events.
We would like to warmly welcome the 17 sponsors of DebConf20, and introduce them to you.
We have four Platinum sponsors.
Our first Platinum sponsor is
Like
This fails for RSPM as no binary is present and a source build fails for the familiar lack of a
The installation of
Shortly after yesterday s start of the
After a short introduction by Hong Phuc we turned to a self-introduction and what is equality for me round. This brought up already a wide variety of issues that need to be addressed if we want to counter inequality in free software (culture differences, language barriers, internet connection, access to services, onboarding difficulties, political restrictions, ).
Unfortunately, on-air time was rather restricted, but even after the DebConf related streaming time slot was finished, we continued discussing problems and possible approaches for another two hours. We have agreed to continue our collaboration and meetings in the hope that we, in particular the FOSSASIA community, can support those in need to counter inequality.
Concluding, I have to say I am very happy to be part of the FOSSASIA community where real diversity is lived and everyone strives for and tries to increase social equality. In the DebConf IRC chat I was asked why at FOSSASIA we have about a 50:50 quote between women and men, in contrast to the usual 10:90 predominant in most software communities including Debian. For me this boils down to many reasons, one being competent female leadership, Hong Phuc is inspiring and competent to a degree I haven t seen in anyone else. Another reason is of course that software development is, especially in developing countries, one of the few escape pods for any gender, and thus fully embraced by normally underrepresented groups. Finally, but this is a typical chicken-egg problem, the FOSSASIA community is not doing any specific gender politics, but simply remains open and friendly to everyone. I think Debian, and in particular the diversity movement in Debian can learn a lot from the FOSSASIA community. At the end we are all striving for more equality in our projects and in the realm of free software as a whole!
Thanks again for all the participants for the very inspiring discussion, and I am looking forward to our next meetings!
As client certificates are on the way out and Debian's SSO solution is effectively not maintained any longer, I switched self-service buildd givebacks over to Salsa authentication. It lives again at 
After quite some time maintaining Qt in Debian both Dmitry Shachnev and I decided to not maintain Qt 6 when it's published (expected in December 2020, see